Literature DB >> 18612116

Association between the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 and patient wait times and travel distance for chemotherapy.

Alisa M Shea1, Lesley H Curtis, Bradley G Hammill, Lisa D DiMartino, Amy P Abernethy, Kevin A Schulman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) altered reimbursements for outpatient chemotherapy drugs and drug administration services. Anecdotal reports suggest that these adjustments may have negatively affected access to chemotherapy for Medicare beneficiaries.
OBJECTIVE: To compare patient wait times and travel distances for chemotherapy before and after the enactment of the MMA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Analysis of a nationally representative 5% sample of claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for the period 2003 through 2006. Patients were Medicare beneficiaries with incident breast cancer, colorectal cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, or lymphoma who received chemotherapy in inpatient hospital, institutional outpatient, or physician office settings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Days from incident diagnosis to first chemotherapy visit and distance traveled for treatment, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, cancer type, geographic region, comorbid conditions, and year of diagnosis and treatment.
RESULTS: There were 5082 incident cases of breast cancer, colorectal cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, or lymphoma in 2003; 5379 cases in 2004; 5116 cases in 2005; and 5288 cases in 2006. Approximately 70% of patients received treatment in physician office settings in each year. Although the distribution of treatment settings in 2004 and 2005 was not significantly different from 2003 (P = .24 and P = .72, respectively), there was a small but significant change from 2003 to 2006 (P = .02). The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy in inpatient settings decreased from 10.2% in 2003 to 8.8% in 2006 (P = .03), and the proportion in institutional outpatient settings increased from 21.1% to 22.5% (P = .004). The proportion in physician offices remained at 68.7% (P = .29). The median time from diagnosis to initial chemotherapy visit was 28 days in 2003, 27 days in 2004, 29 days in 2005, and 28 days in 2006. In multivariate analyses, average wait times for chemotherapy were 1.96 days longer in 2005 than in 2003 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-3.80 days; P = .04) but not significantly different in 2006 (0.88 days; 95% CI, -0.96 to 2.71 days; P = .35). Median travel distance was 7 miles (11.2 km) in 2003 and 8 miles (12.8 km) in 2004 through 2006. After adjustment, average travel distance remained slightly longer in 2004 (1.47 miles [2.35 km]; 95% CI, 0.87-2.07 miles [1.39-3.31 km]; P < .001), 2005 (1.19 miles [1.90 km]; 95% CI, 0.58-1.80 miles [0.93-2.88 km]; P < .001), and 2006 (1.30 miles [2.08 km]; 95% CI, 0.69-1.90 miles [1.10-3.04 km]; P < .001) compared with 2003.
CONCLUSION: There have not been major changes in travel distance and patient wait times for chemotherapy in the Medicare population since 2003, the year before MMA-related changes in reimbursement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18612116     DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.2.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  15 in total

1.  Adequacy of the National Quality Forum's Colon Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy Quality Metric: Is 4 Months Soon Enough?

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; Alex B Haynes; Yi-Ju Chiang; George J Chang; Y Nancy You; Barry W Feig; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Medicare reimbursement and the use of biologic agents: incentives, access, the public good, and optimal care.

Authors:  Michael M Ward
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Using a Dedicated Interventional Pulmonology Practice Decreases Wait Time Before Treatment Initiation for New Lung Cancer Diagnoses.

Authors:  Bryan S Benn; Mihir Parikh; Pei H Tsau; Eric Seeley; Ganesh Krishna
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Private Practice Administrative Costs Influenced by Insurance Payer Mix.

Authors:  Jorge M Luna; Paul W Thurman; Margaret Wolfe; Daniel Yagoda; Edward Reed; William D Figg
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Market Size and Innovation: Effects of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Research and Development.

Authors:  Margaret E Blume-Kohout; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  J Public Econ       Date:  2013-01

6.  The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States.

Authors:  J R Curtis; A Laster; D J Becker; L Carbone; L C Gary; M L Kilgore; R S Matthews; M A Morrisey; K G Saag; S B Tanner; E Delzell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Changes in initial treatment for prostate cancer among Medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2007.

Authors:  Michaela A Dinan; Timothy J Robinson; Timothy M Zagar; Charles D Scales; Lesley H Curtis; Shelby D Reed; W Robert Lee; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Effects of Transitioning to Medicare Part D on Access to Drugs for Medical Conditions among Dual Enrollees with Cancer.

Authors:  Alyce S Adams; Jeanne M Madden; Fang Zhang; Christine Y Lu; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Angelina Lee; Stephen B Soumerai; Dan Gilden; Neetu Chawla; Jennifer J Griggs
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Impact of payment reform on chemotherapy at the end of life.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Jonathan S Skinner; J Russell Hoverman; Ellen Meara
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Impact of payment reform on chemotherapy at the end of life.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Jonathan S Skinner; J Russell Hoverman; Ellen Meara
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.