| Literature DB >> 22693638 |
Peter J Unmack1, Justin C Bagley, Mark Adams, Michael P Hammer, Jerald B Johnson.
Abstract
The freshwater fauna of Southern Australia is primarily restricted to the southwestern and southeastern corners of the continent, and is separated by a large, arid region that is inhospitable to this biota. This geographic phenomenon has attracted considerable interest from biogeographers looking to explain evolutionary diversification in this region. Here, we employed phylogenetic and phylogeographic approaches to evaluate the effect of this barrier on a group of four galaxiid fish species (Galaxiella) endemic to temperate Southern Australia. We also tested if continental shelf width has influenced connectivity among populations during low sea levels when rivers, now isolated, could have been connected. We addressed these questions by sampling each species across its range using multiple molecular markers (mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences, nuclear S7 intron sequences, and 49 allozyme loci). These data also allowed us to assess species boundaries, to refine phylogenetic affinities, and to estimate species ages. Interestingly, we found compelling evidence for cryptic species in G. pusilla, manifesting as allopatric eastern and western taxa. Our combined phylogeny and dating analysis point to an origin for the genus dating to the early Cenozoic, with three of the four species originating during the Oligocene-Miocene. Each Galaxiella species showed high levels of genetic divergences between all but the most proximate populations. Despite extensive drainage connections during recent low sea levels in southeastern Australia, populations of both species within G. pusilla maintained high levels of genetic structure. All populations experienced Late Pleistocene-Holocene population growth, possibly in response to the relaxation of arid conditions after the last glacial maximum. High levels of genetic divergence and the discovery of new cryptic species have important implications for the conservation of this already threatened group of freshwater species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22693638 PMCID: PMC3367931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Localities for all Galaxiella samples examined.
Refer to Table 1 for corresponding locality details. Each species is represented by a different symbol, with populations from both lineages of G. pusilla color coded to match Figs. 2, 3 and 5. Shaded areas refer to the general distribution of each Galaxiella species. Low sea level drainage patterns are shown to the minus 135 m bathymetric contour. Bathymetry predicts a large depression that we refer to as Lake Bass. The small inset of Australia shows the relevant biogeographic provinces, and the black central southern region represents the extent of the Eucla Basin.
Locality data for all individuals examined.
| site no. | Locality | station code | species | cyt | S7 N | allozyme N |
| 1 | Bray Drain, Robe Naracoorte Rd, SA | FISH99 |
| 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 2 | Bakers Range, SA | FISH90 |
| 11 | 1 | 11 |
| 3 | Drain 32 outside Millicent, SA | FISH99 |
| 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 4 | Drain into Lake Letty (Dismal Swamp), SA | FISH90 |
| 5 | 1 | 5 |
| 5 | Swamp on entrance rd to Piccaninnie main pond, SA | FISH99 |
| 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 6 | Wannon R near Dunkeld, VIC | PU02-117 |
| 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 7 | Darlot Ck near Homerton, VIC | PU02-114 |
| 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 8 | Merri R, Grassmere, VIC | PU02-111 |
| 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 9 | Mount Emu Ck, Panmure, VIC | PU02-112 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 10 | Gosling Ck near Murroon, VIC | PU02-87 |
| 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 11 | Tirhatuan Swamp (now at LaTrobe University), VIC | PU03-03 |
| 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 12 | Tuerong Ck, VIC | PU03-04 |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 13 | Cardinia Ck, Beaconsfield, VIC | PU02-102 |
| 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 14 | Yallock Ck, Koo Wee Rup, VIC | PU02-103 |
| 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 15 | Off Five Mile Track, Wilsons Prom, VIC | PU02-71 |
| 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 16 | Ck from Freshwater Lake, Wilsons Prom, VIC | PU02-70 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 17 | Moe R drains, Moe, VIC | PU02-80 |
| 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 18 | Perry R at Princess Hwy, VIC | PU02-68 |
| 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 19 | Swamp near Harcus, TAS | FISH98 |
| 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 20 | Gladstone Lagoon near Gladstone, TAS | FISH98 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | Tributary to Icena Ck on rd to Ansons Bay, TAS | FISH98 |
| 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 22 | West of Five Hill Rd, Flinders Island, TAS | FISHY4 |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 23 | Lennard Brook, WA |
| 1 | |||
| 24 | Melaleuca Park, Wetland EPP173, WA |
| 3 | 1 | ||
| 25 | Kemerton Nature Reserve, WA |
| 3 | 2 | ||
| 26 | Ironstone Gully, Buayanyup R, WA |
| 3 | 2 | ||
| 27 | Canebreak Pool, Margaret R, WA | PU09-58 |
| 2 | ||
| 28 | Roadside pools off Scott R Rd, WA |
| 2 | 1 | ||
| 29 | Rosa Brook, Mowen Rd, WA | PU09-57 |
| 2 | ||
| 30 | Milyeannup Brook, Brockman Hwy, Blackwood R, WA | PU09-53 |
| 1 | ||
| 31 | Tributary of Donnelly R, upstream of Scott Rd, WA | PU09-52 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 32 | Pemberton, WA | GenBank |
| JN232599.1 | JN232707.1 | |
| 33 | Doggerup Ck, Windy Harbour Rd, WA | PU09-49 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 34 | Chesapeake Rd west, WA |
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 34 | Chesapeake Rd west, WA | GenBank |
| NC_008448.1 | ||
| 35 | Boorara Brook, Muirillup Rd, WA | PU09-48 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 36 | Moores Hut Track, WA |
| 2 | 1 | ||
| 37 | Shannon R, South Western Hwy, WA | PU09-47 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 38 | Deep R, Beardmore Rd below Fernhook Falls, WA | PU09-45 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 39a | Mitchell R, Denmark-Mt Barker Rd, WA | PU09-37 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 39b | Mitchell R, WA |
| 1 | |||
| 40 | Marbelup Brook, off Marbelup North Rd, WA | PU09-38 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| Talka, Maule Basin, Chile | GenBank |
| JN232601.1 | JN232709.1 | ||
| Tributary to Laguna Saval, Valdivia Basin, Chile | GenBank |
| JN232602.1 | JN232710.1 | ||
| (LU) | 8 km N of Los Ulmos, Valdivia Basin, Chile | DAN04-24 |
| 1 | 1 | |
| (RN) | Rio Negro, Maullin Basin, Chile |
| 2 | 2 |
The site number refers to the location of each sample site as shown on Figure 1. The location column gives the general location of each sample. Station code refers to the field number or SAMA EBU code that samples are catalogued as. The last three columns provide the number of individuals (N) examined for each marker. Abbreviations: Ck, creek; Hwy, Highway; R, river; Rd, road; SA, Southern Australia; TAS, Tasmania; VIC, Victoria; WA, Western Australia.
Figure 2Phylogenetic results for all Galaxiella samples examined.
Maximum likelihood trees for Galaxiella based on analysis of cytochrome b (A) and S7 (B) sequences and a neighbour joining tree for allozymes (C). Panel A shows the complete tree with operational taxonomic units (OTUs) for each Galaxiella species collapsed. Expanded trees within each species are shown below, with the lower scale bar applying to each of the four subtrees. Bootstrap values are based on 1000 pseudoreplicates. Trees are rooted with Brachygalaxias. Each OTU code is based on the sampling location number and name in Table 1 and Fig. 1, while the coloured symbols match Figs. 1, 3 and 5.
Figure 3Haplotype networks for each Galaxiella species examined based on the cytochrome b gene.
Each haplotype within G. pusilla (A) is color-coded relative to Figs. 1, 2 and 5. Circle size represents haplotype abundance; the key to circle size is in the center of panel A. The ancestral haplotype in each network is indicated by a box. Haplotype counts are given in parentheses when multiple populations share the same haplotype. Haplotype labels consist of the population number and name from Table 1 and Fig. 1. Unsampled haplotypes are represented by small filled circles.
Figure 5Principal coordinates analyses of Galaxiella pusilla.
PCO for all 100 G. pusilla east (A) and all 82 G. pusilla west (B) individuals. Relative PCO scores are plotted for the first and second dimensions, which individually explain 41% and 10% (A) and 25% and 17% (B) respectively of the total multivariate variation present. Individuals are colour-coded relative to Figs. 1, 2 and 3.
Results from BEAST dating analyses based upon different combinations of calibrations.
| node |
|
|
|
|
| cyt | S7 |
| calibration | mean (95%) | mean (95%) | mean (95%) | mean (95%) | mean (95%) | mean | mean |
| 52 and 14 | 54.4 (52.0–60.2) | 30.9 (22.7–39.3) | 20.8 (14.8–27.1) | 5.2 (2.1–8.1) | 9.6 (6.2–13.1) | 0.835 | 0.197 |
| 52 | 55.8 (52.0–66.2) | 34.3 (24.5–44.5) | 22.5 (15.2–30.5) | 5.7 (2.2–9.1) | 10.3 (6.4–14.6) | 0.777 | 0.182 |
| 14 | 26.8 (18.6–37.2) | 16.7 (14.1–21.5) | 10.9 (7.4–15.1) | 2.7 (1.0–4.3) | 5 (3.0–7.5) | 1.604 | 0.375 |
The first line presents results based on both calibration points of 52 and 14 million years, while the second and third rows represent results under each individual calibration. The mean and 95% highest posterior densities are given for each node (in millions of years), and we report the per lineage mean rate of evolution per million years for each gene in the last two columns.
Figure 4Historical demography of Galaxiella pusilla based on Bayesian skyline plots of female effective population size (N e) changes through time.
Mean posterior N e estimates for each species (darker lines) are bounded by upper and lower 95% highest posterior densities (G. pusilla west, pink shading; G. pusilla east, blue shading). The x-axis represents units of time in thousands of years ago (ka), scaled according to posterior mutation rates estimated in BEAST. The y-axis shows estimated population size in hundreds of thousands, calculated assuming a G. pusilla generation time equal to 1.0. The fish shown is a male G. pusilla west (by MPH).