Literature DB >> 22692521

Effect of topographic cone location on outcomes of corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia.

Steven A Greenstein1, Kristen L Fry, Peter S Hersh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of preoperative topographic cone location on 1-year outcomes of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL).
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial, 99 eyes (66 keratoconus, 33 ectasia) from 76 patients underwent CXL. Cone location was defined by the coordinates of preoperative maximum keratometry (maximum K) using the anterior sagittal curvature topography map (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Patients were divided into three groups: those with a maximum K located within the central 3-mm (central cone group), 3- to 5-mm (paracentral cone group), and outside the 5-mm (peripheral cone group) optical zones. Topography and visual acuity data were obtained preoperatively and at 1 year.
RESULTS: In the combined cohort, maximum K and uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity significantly improved by -1.60±3.40 diopters (D) (P<.001), -0.08±0.25 logMAR (P=.001), and -0.10±0.18 log-MAR (P<.001), respectively. Comparing cone groups, maximum K decreased by 2.60±4.50 D (P<.001) in the central cone group, 1.10±2.50 D (P=.02) in the paracentral cone group, and 0.40±1.20 D (P=.08) in the peripheral cone group. Differences among groups were statistically significant (P<.001). Uncorrected distance visual acuity improved by -0.07±0.3 logMAR (P=.1) (central cone group), -0.1±0.17 logMAR (P=.004) (paracentral cone group), and -0.1±0.25 logMAR (P=.04) (peripheral cone group). Corrected distance visual acuity improved by -0.14±0.21 logMAR (P<.001) (central cone group), -0.08±0.17 logMAR (P=.01) (paracentral cone group), and -0.08±0.12 logMAR (P=.002) (peripheral cone group). For both UDVA and CDVA outcomes, these differences among groups were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: After CXL, more topographic flattening occurs in eyes with centrally located cones and the least flattening effect occurs when the cone is located peripherally. This cone-location effect is found in eyes with both keratoconus and ectasia. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22692521     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20120518-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  16 in total

Review 1.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Safety and efficacy of epithelium removal and transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Z Shalchi; X Wang; M A Nanavaty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Corneal crosslinking for keratoconus in Japanese populations: one year outcomes and a comparison between conventional and accelerated procedures.

Authors:  Naoko Kato; Kenji Konomi; Megumi Shinzawa; Kozue Kasai; Takeshi Ide; Ikuko Toda; Chikako Sakai; Kazuno Negishi; Kazuo Tsubota; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Changes in the Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Changes in the Anterior Segment OCT Parameters Following Customized Corneal Cross-Linking.

Authors:  Tomoya Nishida; Takashi Kojima; Takahiro Kataoka; Naoki Isogai; Yoko Yoshida; Tomoaki Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Factors affecting outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking treatment.

Authors:  I Toprak; V Yaylalı; C Yildirim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Corneal haze and visual outcome after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: A comparison between total epithelium off and partial epithelial removal methods.

Authors:  Hasan Razmjoo; Behrooz Rahimi; Mona Kharraji; Nima Koosha; Alireza Peyman
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-11-29

7.  Predictive Factors of the Standard Cross-linking Outcomes in Adult Keratoconus: One-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Amani E Badawi; Waleed Ali Abou Samra; Ayman Abd El Ghafar
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  A correlation analysis of cone characteristics and central keratometric readings for the different stages of keratoconus.

Authors:  Alvin Jeffrey Munsamy; Vanessa Racquel Moodley
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  One-Year Results of Simultaneous Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus Utilizing a Modern Ablation Software.

Authors:  A M Sherif; M A Ammar; Y S Mostafa; S A Gamal Eldin; A A Osman
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study.

Authors:  Daniel A Godefrooij; Kim Boom; Nienke Soeters; Saskia M Imhof; Robert P L Wisse
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.