Literature DB >> 2269216

Randomization in cancer clinical trials: permutation test and development of a computer program.

Y Ohashi1.   

Abstract

When analyzing cancer clinical trial data where the treatment allocation is done using dynamic balancing methods such as the minimization method for balancing the distribution of important prognostic factors in each arm, conservativeness occurs if such a randomization scheme is ignored and a simple unstratified analysis is carried out. In this paper, the above conservativeness is demonstrated by computer simulation, and the development of a computer program that carries out permutation tests of the log-rank statistics for clinical trial data where the allocation is done by the minimization method or a stratified permuted block design is introduced. We are planning to use this program in practice to supplement a usual stratified analysis and model-based methods such as the Cox regression. The most serious problem in cancer clinical trials in Japan is how to carry out the quality control or data management in trials that are initiated and conducted by researchers without support from pharmaceutical companies. In the final section of this paper, one international collaborative work for developing international guidelines on data management in clinical trials of bladder cancer is briefly introduced, and the differences between the system adopted in US/European statistical centers and the Japanese system is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2269216      PMCID: PMC1567842          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.908713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  The impact of treatment allocation procedures on nominal significance levels and bias.

Authors:  L A Kalish; C B Begg
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1987-06

2.  The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trials.

Authors:  M Zelen
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1974-09

Review 3.  Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: a review.

Authors:  L A Kalish; C B Begg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1985 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  [The minimization method in a medium size clinical trial. Study of immunochemotherapy with PSK in gastric cancer].

Authors:  J Sakamoto; H Nakazato; H Ichihashi; A Koike; Y Ohashi; H Tamura; T Fujii; N Ogawa
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  1988-06

5.  The effect of stratified randomization on size and power of statistical tests in clinical trials.

Authors:  S B Green; D P Byar
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1978

6.  Restricted randomization designs in clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  A simulation study of the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation to two groups in the regression situation.

Authors:  Mikel Aickin
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Randomization in clinical trials: stratification or minimization? The HERMES free simulation software.

Authors:  Hélène Fron Chabouis; Francis Chabouis; Florence Gillaizeau; Pierre Durieux; Gilles Chatellier; N Dorin Ruse; Jean-Pierre Attal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.