Literature DB >> 3895341

Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: a review.

L A Kalish, C B Begg.   

Abstract

A comprehensive review of methods for allocation of treatments to patients in clinical trials is presented. Attention is restricted to controlled, prospective trials, as opposed to comparisons involving historical or other 'external' controls. We describe the features of each method and classify them according to whether their primary focus is randomization, efficiency, or balance with respect to prognostic factors. Methods which prevent bias, ensure an efficient treatment comparison and are simple to implement will contribute to the ability of clinical trials to provide precise and valid treatment comparisons. We assess critically the extent to which the methods achieve these goals, review the relationships of the allocation methods with subsequent analyses of the trial results, discuss current usage and provide guidelines for choice of method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3895341     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780040204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study.

Authors:  M M Rovers; H Straatman; G A Zielhuis
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials.

Authors:  Minsoo Kang; Brian G Ragan; Jae-Hyeon Park
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  A random allocation system with the minimization method for multi-institutional clinical trials.

Authors:  K Akazawa; T Odaka; M Sakamoto; S Ohtsuki; M Shimada; T Kamakura; Y Nose
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Randomization in clinical trials: stratification or minimization? The HERMES free simulation software.

Authors:  Hélène Fron Chabouis; Francis Chabouis; Florence Gillaizeau; Pierre Durieux; Gilles Chatellier; N Dorin Ruse; Jean-Pierre Attal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Cognitive Interventions for Cognitively Healthy, Mildly Impaired, and Mixed Samples of Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Catherine M Mewborn; Cutter A Lindbergh; L Stephen Miller
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Comparison of dynamic block randomization and minimization in randomized trials: a simulation study.

Authors:  Lan Xiao; Phillip W Lavori; Sandra R Wilson; Jun Ma
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for the Prevention of Suicidal Ideation in Medical Interns: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Constance Guille; Zhuo Zhao; John Krystal; Breck Nichols; Kathleen Brady; Srijan Sen
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research.

Authors:  Kp Suresh
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-01

Review 9.  Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Ilana J Halperin; Jan Barnsley; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Baiju R Shah; Karen Tu; Ross Upshur; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Blocking for Sequential Political Experiments.

Authors:  Ryan T Moore; Sally A Moore
Journal:  Polit Anal       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.