Anders Helander1, Oszkár Péter, Yufang Zheng. 1. Alcohol Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, C1:74, Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Laboratory Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. anders.helander@ki.se
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the sensitivity of whole blood phosphatidylethanol (PEth) with serum carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) as biomarkers of current regular alcohol consumption, during outpatient treatment for alcohol-related problems. Urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS), and clinical assessment, were used as complementary estimates of relapse to drinking. METHODS: Biomarker results for 29 men and 11 women (aged 20-73 years) undergoing voluntary outpatient treatment for harmful alcohol use or dependence were utilized for this evaluation. In connection with visits to the unit, blood and/or urine were sampled for measurement of PEth, EtG and EtS (by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), and CDT (%disialotransferrin, by high-pressure liquid chromatography). RESULTS: The comparison included 326 whole blood, 319 serum (1-82 samples/patient) and 654 urine samples (1-178 samples/patient) collected over ~2 years. At the initial assessment, the total PEth value ranged between 0 and 16.5 µmol/l (mean 2.6) with 70% being above the quantification limit (0.1 µmol/l) and 55% above the reference interval (0.7 µmol/l). Initial CDT values were 0.87-6.9% (mean 2.1) with 35% above the applied reference interval (1.7%). At the final sampling (treatment period up to 21 months), the total PEth value had decreased to 0-5.9 µmol/l (mean 0.6; P = 0.0004) and CDT to 0.87-3.3% (mean 1.3; P = 0.0030). Relapses were detected by PEth alone (43% of cases), by PEth and CDT (38%) and the remainder by EtG/EtS. CONCLUSION: PEth was the most sensitive biomarker of current regular alcohol consumption. PEth-16:0/18:1, usually being the major subform, was as sensitive as total PEth. PEth, CDT and EtG/EtS are useful complementary tools for objective identification of current drinking and relapse detection.
AIMS: To compare the sensitivity of whole blood phosphatidylethanol (PEth) with serum carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) as biomarkers of current regular alcohol consumption, during outpatient treatment for alcohol-related problems. Urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS), and clinical assessment, were used as complementary estimates of relapse to drinking. METHODS: Biomarker results for 29 men and 11 women (aged 20-73 years) undergoing voluntary outpatient treatment for harmful alcohol use or dependence were utilized for this evaluation. In connection with visits to the unit, blood and/or urine were sampled for measurement of PEth, EtG and EtS (by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), and CDT (%disialotransferrin, by high-pressure liquid chromatography). RESULTS: The comparison included 326 whole blood, 319 serum (1-82 samples/patient) and 654 urine samples (1-178 samples/patient) collected over ~2 years. At the initial assessment, the total PEth value ranged between 0 and 16.5 µmol/l (mean 2.6) with 70% being above the quantification limit (0.1 µmol/l) and 55% above the reference interval (0.7 µmol/l). Initial CDT values were 0.87-6.9% (mean 2.1) with 35% above the applied reference interval (1.7%). At the final sampling (treatment period up to 21 months), the total PEth value had decreased to 0-5.9 µmol/l (mean 0.6; P = 0.0004) and CDT to 0.87-3.3% (mean 1.3; P = 0.0030). Relapses were detected by PEth alone (43% of cases), by PEth and CDT (38%) and the remainder by EtG/EtS. CONCLUSION:PEth was the most sensitive biomarker of current regular alcohol consumption. PEth-16:0/18:1, usually being the major subform, was as sensitive as total PEth. PEth, CDT and EtG/EtS are useful complementary tools for objective identification of current drinking and relapse detection.
Authors: Sonja Kilo; Birgit Hofmann; Elisabeth Eckert; Thomas Göen; Hans Drexler Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Yan Wang; Xinguang Chen; Judith A Hahn; Babette Brumback; Zhi Zhou; Maria J Miguez; Robert L Cook Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Donald M Dougherty; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Yuanyuan Liang; Tara E Karns; Sharon E Cates; Sarah L Lake; Jillian Mullen; John D Roache Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Andrew K Littlefield; Jennifer L Brown; Ralph J DiClemente; Polina Safonova; Jessica M Sales; Eve S Rose; Nikolay Belyakov; Vadim V Rassokhin Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-07
Authors: Scott H Stewart; David G Koch; Ira R Willner; Raymond F Anton; Adrian Reuben Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Joris C Verster; Chris Alford; Adriana C Bervoets; Suzanne de Klerk; James A Grange; Anna Hogewoning; Kate Jones; Darren L Kruisselbrink; Lauren Owen; Thomas M Piasecki; Senta Jorinde Raasveld; Sam Royle; Wendy S Slutske; Gordon S Smith; Richard Stephens Journal: Curr Drug Abuse Rev Date: 2013-09
Authors: Ludmila N Bakhireva; Renate D Savich; Dennis W Raisch; Sandra Cano; Robert D Annett; Lawrence Leeman; Mahek Garg; Chelsea Goff; Daniel D Savage Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Martin A Javors; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; John D Roache; Tara E Karns-Wright; Donald M Dougherty Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 3.455