Literature DB >> 22691387

Monitoring of the alcohol biomarkers PEth, CDT and EtG/EtS in an outpatient treatment setting.

Anders Helander1, Oszkár Péter, Yufang Zheng.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the sensitivity of whole blood phosphatidylethanol (PEth) with serum carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) as biomarkers of current regular alcohol consumption, during outpatient treatment for alcohol-related problems. Urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS), and clinical assessment, were used as complementary estimates of relapse to drinking.
METHODS: Biomarker results for 29 men and 11 women (aged 20-73 years) undergoing voluntary outpatient treatment for harmful alcohol use or dependence were utilized for this evaluation. In connection with visits to the unit, blood and/or urine were sampled for measurement of PEth, EtG and EtS (by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), and CDT (%disialotransferrin, by high-pressure liquid chromatography).
RESULTS: The comparison included 326 whole blood, 319 serum (1-82 samples/patient) and 654 urine samples (1-178 samples/patient) collected over ~2 years. At the initial assessment, the total PEth value ranged between 0 and 16.5 µmol/l (mean 2.6) with 70% being above the quantification limit (0.1 µmol/l) and 55% above the reference interval (0.7 µmol/l). Initial CDT values were 0.87-6.9% (mean 2.1) with 35% above the applied reference interval (1.7%). At the final sampling (treatment period up to 21 months), the total PEth value had decreased to 0-5.9 µmol/l (mean 0.6; P = 0.0004) and CDT to 0.87-3.3% (mean 1.3; P = 0.0030). Relapses were detected by PEth alone (43% of cases), by PEth and CDT (38%) and the remainder by EtG/EtS.
CONCLUSION: PEth was the most sensitive biomarker of current regular alcohol consumption. PEth-16:0/18:1, usually being the major subform, was as sensitive as total PEth. PEth, CDT and EtG/EtS are useful complementary tools for objective identification of current drinking and relapse detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22691387     DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/ags065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


  36 in total

1.  Evaluation of biomarkers assessing regular alcohol consumption in an occupational setting.

Authors:  Sonja Kilo; Birgit Hofmann; Elisabeth Eckert; Thomas Göen; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Phosphatidylethanol in Comparison to Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption Among HIV-Infected Women in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Naltrexone for Reducing Hazardous Drinking.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Xinguang Chen; Judith A Hahn; Babette Brumback; Zhi Zhou; Maria J Miguez; Robert L Cook
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Use of continuous transdermal alcohol monitoring during a contingency management procedure to reduce excessive alcohol use.

Authors:  Donald M Dougherty; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; Yuanyuan Liang; Tara E Karns; Sharon E Cates; Sarah L Lake; Jillian Mullen; John D Roache
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) as a Biomarker of Alcohol Consumption in HIV-Infected Young Russian Women: Comparison to Self-Report Assessments of Alcohol Use.

Authors:  Andrew K Littlefield; Jennifer L Brown; Ralph J DiClemente; Polina Safonova; Jessica M Sales; Eve S Rose; Nikolay Belyakov; Vadim V Rassokhin
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2017-07

5.  Validation of blood phosphatidylethanol as an alcohol consumption biomarker in patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Scott H Stewart; David G Koch; Ira R Willner; Raymond F Anton; Adrian Reuben
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  Biomarkers for detection of alcohol consumption in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Katharina Staufer; Michel Yegles
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Hangover research needs: proceedings of the 5th Alcohol Hangover Research Group meeting.

Authors:  Joris C Verster; Chris Alford; Adriana C Bervoets; Suzanne de Klerk; James A Grange; Anna Hogewoning; Kate Jones; Darren L Kruisselbrink; Lauren Owen; Thomas M Piasecki; Senta Jorinde Raasveld; Sam Royle; Wendy S Slutske; Gordon S Smith; Richard Stephens
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2013-09

Review 8.  Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Lorenzo Leggio; Mary R Lee
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  The feasibility and cost of neonatal screening for prenatal alcohol exposure by measuring phosphatidylethanol in dried blood spots.

Authors:  Ludmila N Bakhireva; Renate D Savich; Dennis W Raisch; Sandra Cano; Robert D Annett; Lawrence Leeman; Mahek Garg; Chelsea Goff; Daniel D Savage
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Characterization of the Pharmacokinetics of Phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1 and 16:0/18:2 in Human Whole Blood After Alcohol Consumption in a Clinical Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Martin A Javors; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; John D Roache; Tara E Karns-Wright; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.