Literature DB >> 22690054

Postprandial lipemia in pre- and postmenopausal women.

Gaffar S Zaman1, Sajida Rahman, Jalelur Rahman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The increased risk for coronary artery disease observed in postmenopausal (PoW) women is partly explained by a more atherogenic lipoprotein profile. Moreover, natural menopause has been associated with an altered postprandial lipid profile. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that young premenopausal (PrW) and PoW may be independently associated with postprandial lipemia and indirectly associated with atherosclerosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 46 healthy PrW and 44 healthy PoW participated in a 5-h intervention study. Blood samples were taken at the baseline and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after eating. Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, fasting, and postprandial triglycerides (PPTG) were determined sequentially in blood samples.
RESULTS: PPTG presented significant higher values in PoW compared to PrW (P < 0.05), but other lipids did not significantly differ between groups. PPTG concentrations in PoW were significantly higher than in PrW (P < 0.05). There was a significant time influence (P < 0.05) in TG in PrW and PoW, while time to peak and peak concentration were significantly higher in PoW than PrW. Other lipids were also decreased more in PrW than PoW, but not significantly so. Cholesterol concentrations showed a significant reduction after 2 h, to reach values similar to the baseline after 4 h in PrW but not in PoW. HDL-cholesterol concentration was decreased more in PoW compared to PrW but it was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Lipid postprandial response indicates a higher cardiovascular risk pattern in PoW compared to PrW.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerosis; lipid profile; postmenopause; postprandial lipemia; premenopause

Year:  2012        PMID: 22690054      PMCID: PMC3361781          DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.95961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med        ISSN: 0976-9668


INTRODUCTION

Recent research shows close association of postprandial lipemia (PPL) with atherosclerosis. Triglycerides (TGs) are better predictors,[1] although their predictive power has been underestimated in many epidemiological studies.[2] Exaggerated PPL has invariably been observed in normolipidemic men[3-5] and in one study of normolipidemic women with coronary artery disease (CAD).[6] PPL is closely correlated with carotid intima-media thickness in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic individuals independent of other risk factors.[7-9] Higher daytime triglyceridemia with similar fasting triglyceride (FTG) levels was observed in subjects with premature CAD as compared to their first-degree relatives without CAD.[10] Indeed some evidence suggests that postprandial plasma triglyceride (PPTG) levels predict future myocardial infarction better than FTG levels.[11] Many studies have consistently shown that, in the hours following a meal, TG concentration is higher in patients with CAD than in subjects without,[12] and this is an independent risk factor for CAD.[13] Postprandial lipoprotein metabolism is affected by dietary habits, meal composition (amount and type of fat, carbohydrates, proteins, fiber, and alcohol), lifestyle practices, (physical activity and tobacco use), physiological factors (age, gender, and menopausal status), and pathological conditions (obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus (DM), etc).[14-16] Abnormalities during the postprandial state contribute to the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk.[17] The TG-rich lipoproteins are involved in many pathways leading to atherosclerosis. They are carriers of cholesteryl esters to the vessel wall[18] and they are toxic to the endothelial cells (ECs) and induce endothelial dysfunction.[19-22] More and more research suggest that increased PPTG, not increased FTG, is an independent atherosclerotic disease risk factor.[23] EC damage or dysfunction is associated with the onset and progression of atherosclerosis.[2425] A myriad of seemingly unrelated risk factors may cause EC damage, leading to atherosclerosis. Dyslipidemia has been accorded a crucial role, but our understanding of the contribution of different lipids and lipoproteins continues to evolve.[2627] Recent studies have shown that postprandial handling of TG-rich lipoprotein is important for the propensity of endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis.[28-30] There are very few studies comparing postprandial lipid metabolism before and after menopause.[31-33] Very few data exist regarding the response of PPTG in premenopausal (PrW) and postmenopausal women (PoW). Therefore, this study was undertaken with the following objectives: To find out the magnitude of PPL among the PrW and PoW. To find the association of FTG levels with PPTG levels in PrW and PoW. Estimate the relationship between the other lipids, i.e. total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) in PrW and PoW.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical rules of the Helsinki Declaration. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital, and all women gave written informed consent. Prior to the study, participants were informed that their confidentiality would be maintained and consent was obtained. For the group of young women, individuals selected had to be healthy, between 18 and 45 years old, premenopausal, non-hypertensive, non-diabetic, not pregnant, not obese [body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2], and could not be taking medication known to affect bone and lipid metabolism or be taking vitamin, mineral, or phytoestrogen supplements. Women for the postmenopausal group had to be amenorrheic for at least 1 year, non-hypertensive, non-diabetic, could not be obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2), could not be receiving estrogen replacement therapy or any other medication known to affect bone and lipid metabolism or be taking vitamin, mineral, or phytoestrogen supplements. None of the women smoked. In order to unify food intake the evening before the study, all patients followed written instructions with regard to a standardized dinner composition (known amount of vegetables and chicken curry with given quantity of rice). They were instructed to eat it before 21:00 h (in the previous evening) to avoid the effects of previous food intake and then refrained from all food and beverages (except water) until 08:30 h on the following morning. On the next day morning, all participants had to be at the laboratory around 08:30 AM and remain at rest without ingesting any type of food, except the standard meal and water. The meal was ingested in up to 15 min and comprised sandwich loaf (two slices equivalent to 140 g) and butter (about 20 g). On the morning of the visit, blood pressure, weight, and height were measured and compliance with dinner instructions was verified with a questionnaire. After that, each participant underwent a structured examination, which included an interview. Height, weight, waist circumference (WC) and hip measurements, a fasting venipuncture, and sequential determination of serum lipids were done. Height and weight were measured to the nearest 0.5 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively. BMI was calculated as weight (kilogram) divided by height (in meter) squared. WC was determined to the nearest 0.1 cm using a measuring tape positioned at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest and hips were measured at the largest gluteal circumference. These measurements were used to calculate the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Then, blood pressure was measured using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer. Postprandial blood samples were taken 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after the end of the study meal. To maintain hydration throughout the postprandial time, women drank 100 ml of demineralized water after 1, 2, and 3 h after eating. Samples were centrifuged; serum was collected and stored at 20 °C until analyzed. Lipid profiles comprising TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG concentrations were measured at fasting and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post-load. Sample serum concentrations of TC, HDL-C, and TG were measured by enzymatic colorimetric methods using a Star Plus 21 semi-autoanalyser of Rapid Diagnostic Company. Calculation of LDL-C concentrations was based on the Friedewald equation.[34] The diagnosis of DM was based on WHO criteria,[35] i.e. a fasting plasma glucose level > 7.0 mmol/L or > 126 mg/dL, or a 2-h postprandial plasma glucose level > 11.1 mmol/L or > 200 mg/dL on more than one occasion, with symptoms of diabetes. All data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet, and were analyzed using standard statistical software such as SPSS. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables. All numerical data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Subjects of the premenopausal group were between the ages of 18 and 37, and those from the postmenopausal group were between 52 and 58 years of age. The anthropometric measurements and clinical characteristics of the groups of patients and the control subjects are summarized in Table 1. PrW (n = 46) and PoW (n = 44) were matched for BMI (mean ± SD = 26.1 ± 2.8 vs. 27.3 ± 2.4 kg/m2, respectively), WC (mean ± SD = 92.1 ± 7.1 vs. 92.4 ± 8.7 cm, respectively), and WHR (mean ± SD = 0.92 ± 0.08 vs. 0.93 ± 0.01).
Table 1

Anthropometric measurements of the premenopausal and postmenopausal women

Anthropometric measurements of the premenopausal and postmenopausal women The result of the study on the relationship between the serum lipids in PrW and PoW are represented in Figures 1–4. The mean TC in mg/dL was 157, 168, 188, 170, and 156 at fasting, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h in the PrW vs. 162, 175, 196, 180, and 173 in the PoW during the same duration. Cholesterol concentrations showed a significant reduction after 2 h, to reach values similar to the baseline after 4 h in PrW but not in PoW. The mean HDL-C in mg/dL was 47.34, 43.63, 42.1, 42.28 and 41.2 at fasting, first, second, third and fourth hours after the test meal in the PrW vs. 44.3, 42.8, 42.2, 43.11, and 39.14 in the PoW during the same time interval. This shows that HDL-C concentration was decreased more in PoW compared to PrW but it was not significant. The mean LDL-C in mg/dL was 121.39, 127.27, 106.3, 101, and 92.8 at fasting, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h in the PrW vs. 134.54, 139.3, 126, 128.3, and 114.1 in the PoW during the same amount of time.
Figure 1

Fasting and postprandial serum triacylglycerol in mg/dL in premenopausal (♦) and postmenopausal (■) women

Figure 4

Fasting and postprandial serum LDL-cholesterol in mg/dL in premenopausal (♦) and postmenopausal (■) women

Fasting and postprandial serum triacylglycerol in mg/dL in premenopausal (♦) and postmenopausal (■) women Fasting and postprandial total cholesterol in mg/dL in premenopausal (♦) and postmenopausal (■) women Fasting and postprandial serum HDL-cholesterol in mg/dL in premenopausal (♦) and postmenopausal (■) women Fasting and postprandial serum LDL-cholesterol in mg/dL in premenopausal (♦) and postmenopausal (■) women FTG was significantly related to PPTG in PrW and PoW. As FTG increased, PPTG also increased in the study group. The PPTG was increased significantly more in PoW (148 mg/dL, 178 mg/dL, 189 mg/dL and 206 mg/dL in the first, second, third and fourth hours after the test meal) compared to PrW (94 mg/dL, 136 mg/dL, 168 mg/dL and 153 mg/dL in the first, second, third and fourth hours after the test meal), P < 0.05. There was a significant time influence (P < 0.05) in TG in PrW and PoW, while time to peak and peak concentration were significantly higher in PoW than PrW. In this study postprandially, 43% of PoW had TG levels more than the highest TG level in PrW.

DISCUSSION

This study clearly shows the differences in PPTG response between PoW and PrW with similar age, BMI, daily intake, even after careful matching. PoW displays higher PPL than PrW, and the TG concentration in PoW does not return to baseline levels within 4 h. Even when adjusting for TG baseline values, these differences were still observed. We studied nonsmoking women of similar age and BMI, because smoking, obesity, and age influence both lipid metabolism and the occurrence of menopause.[36] In theory, the selection of age-matched groups might be a problem, because the fact that menopause was reached at a different chronological age could be an indication of under menopausal changes in fasting plasma lipids in our study were highly comparable to those found by others in longitudinal[3738] or cross-sectional[3940] studies. Several clinical studies have shown that the magnitude and duration of PPL are positively related to the pathogenesis and progression of coronary heart disease (CHD). Postprandial lipid metabolism refers to the series of metabolic events that occur following the ingestion of a meal containing fat. Dietary fat is principally composed of TG; PPL therefore being characterized by an increase in plasma TG concentration.[41] PPL is influenced by various parameters such as gastric emptying time, intestinal absorption, and lipoprotein lipase activity. Some studies have shown that the gastric emptying of liquids and solids decreases with age,[42] but intestinal motility is not altered with age.[43] Pancreatic secretion slightly decreases with age.[44] However, Arora et al.[4546] studying healthy individuals have reported that fecal excretion, and, consequently, fat absorption changes slightly with age, suggesting that the decrease in pancreatic secretion is not enough to hinder the normal digestive process. One could imagine that because older individuals have a longer gastric emptying time, the absorption of fat would be slowed, justifying a late elevation in triglyceridemia. With age, gastric emptying rate and lipoprotein lipase activity are known to decrease, and a reduction of pancreatic lipase secretion and a delay in the clearance of TG-rich lipoproteins have also been observed.[31] Bibliographical data on postprandial metabolism in PrW and PoW women are scarce and the studies that have been undertaken involve very small numbers of subjects. It is also difficult to compare data due to of the variety of food employed in the different studies. The lower PPL displayed by the PrW in this study was also found in other studies, with levels of TG for PrW and PoW similar to our data.[47] Nabeno et al.[31] reported similar results, but differ in the baseline characteristics of the women studied and in the food consumed, which was given as a fat-rich cream. Hyperinsulinemia usually induces an overproduction of TG-rich lipoproteins in the liver by increasing the availability of free fatty acids, which are the most important precursors of de novo TG synthesis. However, it has been seen that the postprandial response is complex, and both lipoprotein concentrations and composition are affected.[48] In the study by Pirro et al., it has been seen that PoW women with mixed hyperlipemia show a greater PPTG increase and a more pronounced reduction in the HDL-C level and LDL-C size than hypercholesterolemic and normolipemic subjects. The presence of the features of insulin resistance syndrome could contribute to the deterioration of postprandial lipemic response in those subjects.[49] Data collected over 25 years ago from the Framingham Heart Study demonstrated that TG levels could influence the CAD risk only in patients with a low HDL-C concentration.[50] After numerous reports, the association of high TG concentration with low HDL-C levels is now well established among patients with CAD.[51] Other factors besides TG that have a further influence on HDL-C levels are BMI, adipose tissue distribution, serum glucose and insulin levels, smoking, and alcohol intake.[5253] A positive correlation between BMI and PPL has been reported in some studies where an elevated BMI seemed to aggravate the postprandial response.[54] Prolonged exposure of the endothelium to TG-rich atherogenic remnant particles might be the reason why postprandial increases in TG account for greater CAD risk.[55] Furthermore, the clearance of chylomicrons and their remnants is impaired in coronary atherosclerosis.[56] Also, for those individuals at risk for CHD, chylomicrons can be poorly hydrolyzed and their clearance via hepatic receptor-mediated pathways delayed.[5758] Therefore, we can say that natural menopause is associated with aggravated PPL in women matched for age and BMI. Higher PPL potentially explains the relation of TGs and CHD mortality risk in PoW.[59]
  59 in total

1.  Acute hypertriglyceridemia is associated with peripheral vasodilation and increased basal flow in healthy young adults.

Authors:  N Gokce; S J Duffy; L M Hunter; J F Keaney; J A Vita
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Postprandial lipemia and associated metabolic disturbances in healthy and hyperlipemic postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Pirro; G Lupattelli; D Siepi; B Palumbo; A R Roscini; S Marchesi; G Schillaci; E Mannarino
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.694

3.  Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia impairs endothelial function by enhanced oxidant stress.

Authors:  J H Bae; E Bassenge; K B Kim; Y N Kim; K S Kim; H J Lee; K C Moon; M S Lee; K Y Park; M Schwemmer
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Moderate alcohol consumption and changes in postprandial lipoproteins of premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a diet-controlled, randomized intervention study.

Authors:  M S van der Gaag; A Sierksma; G Schaafsma; A van Tol; T Geelhoed-Mieras; M Bakker; H F Hendriks
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  Postprandial triglycerides and endothelial function.

Authors:  A Jagla; J Schrezenmeir
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.949

Review 6.  The impact of postprandial lipemia in accelerating atherothrombosis.

Authors:  H M Roche; M J Gibney
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Risk       Date:  2000-10

Review 7.  High-energy diets, fatty acids and endothelial cell function: implications for atherosclerosis.

Authors:  B Hennig; M Toborek; C J McClain
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Inflammation and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Peter Libby; Paul M Ridker; Attilio Maseri
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Vascular biology of atherosclerosis: overview and state of the art.

Authors:  Peter Libby
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  High triglycerides/low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischemic electrocardiogram changes, and risk of ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Jørgen Jeppesen; Hans Ole Hein; Poul Suadicani; Finn Gyntelberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  3 in total

1.  Resistance exercise at variable volume does not reduce postprandial lipemia in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Cleiton Silva Correa; Bruno Costa Teixeira; Rodrigo Cauduro Oliveira Macedo; Aline Bittencourt; Renata Lopes Kruger; Julia Silveira Gross; Ronei Silveira Pinto; Alvaro Reischak-Oliveira
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-01-12

2.  Assessment of postprandial triglycerides in clinical practice: Validation in a general population and coronary heart disease patients.

Authors:  Pablo Perez-Martinez; Juan F Alcala-Diaz; Edmon K Kabagambe; Antonio Garcia-Rios; Michael Y Tsai; Javier Delgado-Lista; Genovefa Kolovou; Robert J Straka; Francisco Gomez-Delgado; Paul N Hopkins; Carmen Marin; Ingrid Borecki; Elena M Yubero-Serrano; James E Hixson; Antonio Camargo; Michael A Province; Javier Lopez-Moreno; Fernando Rodriguez-Cantalejo; Francisco J Tinahones; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Francisco Perez-Jimenez; Donna K Arnett; Jose M Ordovas; Jose Lopez-Miranda
Journal:  J Clin Lipidol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.766

Review 3.  Postprandial lipemia: factoring in lipemic response for ranking foods for their healthiness.

Authors:  Cintia Botelho Dias; Paul J Moughan; Lisa G Wood; Harjinder Singh; Manohar L Garg
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.876

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.