Literature DB >> 22689976

Dynamic epistasis for different alleles of the same gene.

Lin Xu1, Brandon Barker, Zhenglong Gu.   

Abstract

Epistasis refers to the phenomenon in which phenotypic consequences caused by mutation of one gene depend on one or more mutations at another gene. Epistasis is critical for understanding many genetic and evolutionary processes, including pathway organization, evolution of sexual reproduction, mutational load, ploidy, genomic complexity, speciation, and the origin of life. Nevertheless, current understandings for the genome-wide distribution of epistasis are mostly inferred from interactions among one mutant type per gene, whereas how epistatic interaction partners change dynamically for different mutant alleles of the same gene is largely unknown. Here we address this issue by combining predictions from flux balance analysis and data from a recently published high-throughput experiment. Our results show that different alleles can epistatically interact with very different gene sets. Furthermore, between two random mutant alleles of the same gene, the chance for the allele with more severe mutational consequence to develop a higher percentage of negative epistasis than the other allele is 50~70% in eukaryotic organisms, but only 20~30% in bacteria and archaea. We developed a population genetics model that predicts that the observed distribution for the sign of epistasis can speed up the process of purging deleterious mutations in eukaryotic organisms. Our results indicate that epistasis among genes can be dynamically rewired at the genome level, and call on future efforts to revisit theories that can integrate epistatic dynamics among genes in biological systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22689976      PMCID: PMC3387062          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121507109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  51 in total

1.  Regulation of gene expression in flux balance models of metabolism.

Authors:  M W Covert; C H Schilling; B Palsson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Quantifying antagonistic epistasis in a multifunctional RNA secondary structure of the Rous sarcoma virus.

Authors:  Rafael Sanjuán
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 3.  The growing scope of applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions using Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Adam M Feist; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Unravelling the evolutionary advantage of sex: a commentary on 'Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination' by Brian Charlesworth.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism.

Authors:  Daniel Segrè; Alexander Deluna; George M Church; Roy Kishony
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-12-12       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome.

Authors:  Xuewen Pan; Daniel S Yuan; Dong Xiang; Xiaoling Wang; Sharon Sookhai-Mahadeo; Joel S Bader; Philip Hieter; Forrest Spencer; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data.

Authors:  J S Edwards; R U Ibarra; B O Palsson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  Epistasis--the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Prevalent positive epistasis in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic networks.

Authors:  Xionglei He; Wenfeng Qian; Zhi Wang; Ying Li; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network.

Authors:  Dorothea Fiedler; Hannes Braberg; Monika Mehta; Gal Chechik; Gerard Cagney; Paromita Mukherjee; Andrea C Silva; Michael Shales; Sean R Collins; Sake van Wageningen; Patrick Kemmeren; Frank C P Holstege; Jonathan S Weissman; Michael-Christopher Keogh; Daphne Koller; Kevan M Shokat; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  12 in total

1.  The impact of ALDH7A1 variants in oral cancer development and prognosis.

Authors:  Hsueh-Ju Lu; Chun-Yi Chuang; Mu-Kuan Chen; Chun-Wen Su; Wei-En Yang; Chia-Ming Yeh; Kuan-Ming Lai; Chih-Hsin Tang; Chiao-Wen Lin; Shun-Fa Yang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.955

Review 2.  Computational approaches for understanding energy metabolism.

Authors:  Alexander A Shestov; Brandon Barker; Zhenglong Gu; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2013-07-29

Review 3.  Molecular network analysis enhances understanding of the biology of mental disorders.

Authors:  Kay S Grennan; Chao Chen; Elliot S Gershon; Chunyu Liu
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Yeast 5 - an expanded reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network.

Authors:  Benjamin D Heavner; Kieran Smallbone; Brandon Barker; Pedro Mendes; Larry P Walker
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2012-06-04

5.  Dynamic epistasis under varying environmental perturbations.

Authors:  Brandon Barker; Lin Xu; Zhenglong Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The strength of genetic interactions scales weakly with mutational effects.

Authors:  Andrea Velenich; Jeff Gore
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Alleles of a gene differ in pleiotropy, often mediated through currency metabolite production, in E. coli and yeast metabolic simulations.

Authors:  Deya Alzoubi; Abdelmoneim Amer Desouki; Martin J Lercher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Improved discovery of genetic interactions using CRISPRiSeq across multiple environments.

Authors:  Mia Jaffe; Adam Dziulko; Justin D Smith; Robert P St Onge; Sasha F Levy; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Abundant local interactions in the 4p16.1 region suggest functional mechanisms underlying SLC2A9 associations with human serum uric acid.

Authors:  Wen-Hua Wei; Yunfei Guo; Alida S D Kindt; Tony R Merriman; Colin A Semple; Kai Wang; Chris S Haley
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Flux, toxicity, and expression costs generate complex genetic interactions in a metabolic pathway.

Authors:  Harry Kemble; Catherine Eisenhauer; Alejandro Couce; Audrey Chapron; Mélanie Magnan; Gregory Gautier; Hervé Le Nagard; Philippe Nghe; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.