OBJECTIVE: Hemorrhage within a hepatic cyst (hemorrhagic hepatic cyst, HHC) is a complication of liver cysts that is difficult to differentiate from other neoplastic entities on imaging. Even when accurately diagnosed, there has been a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment strategy. After presenting our experience with a patient treated via laparoscopy, we aimed to conduct a review of the literature on HHCs. METHODS: A computerized search in Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, and The Cochrane Collaboration was carried out for journal articles or abstracts published from 1950 to 2011. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with HHCs were identified from 1983 to 2011. The cohort had an even gender distribution with a mean age of 62.7 years. Most patients presented with abdominal pain (80 %), while three (14 %) patients were asymptomatic at the time of presentation. CT imaging and ultrasound were unable to accurately diagnose HHC, whereas hyperintensity on MRI was a reliable diagnostic tool. Three (13 %) patients were managed conservatively with observation. Seven (30 %) patients had percutaneous transhepatic drainage. Among these, two patients experienced recurrence that required repeat treatment. Two (9 %) patients underwent open unroofing of their HHC and one (4 %) laparoscopically, without recurrences. Seven (30 %) patients underwent hepatic resection, whereas six (26 %) patients had a cyst enucleation for their HHCs. All patients had uneventful recoveries, with a mean follow-up of 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a reliable diagnostic tool in the setting of an HHC. Laparoscopic unroofing of HHCs may represent a less morbid and safe treatment modality with low recurrence rates. Given the low level of clinical evidence available so far, these results should be interpreted with caution.
OBJECTIVE:Hemorrhage within a hepatic cyst (hemorrhagic hepatic cyst, HHC) is a complication of liver cysts that is difficult to differentiate from other neoplastic entities on imaging. Even when accurately diagnosed, there has been a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment strategy. After presenting our experience with a patient treated via laparoscopy, we aimed to conduct a review of the literature on HHCs. METHODS: A computerized search in Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, and The Cochrane Collaboration was carried out for journal articles or abstracts published from 1950 to 2011. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with HHCs were identified from 1983 to 2011. The cohort had an even gender distribution with a mean age of 62.7 years. Most patients presented with abdominal pain (80 %), while three (14 %) patients were asymptomatic at the time of presentation. CT imaging and ultrasound were unable to accurately diagnose HHC, whereas hyperintensity on MRI was a reliable diagnostic tool. Three (13 %) patients were managed conservatively with observation. Seven (30 %) patients had percutaneous transhepatic drainage. Among these, two patients experienced recurrence that required repeat treatment. Two (9 %) patients underwent open unroofing of their HHC and one (4 %) laparoscopically, without recurrences. Seven (30 %) patients underwent hepatic resection, whereas six (26 %) patients had a cyst enucleation for their HHCs. All patients had uneventful recoveries, with a mean follow-up of 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a reliable diagnostic tool in the setting of an HHC. Laparoscopic unroofing of HHCs may represent a less morbid and safe treatment modality with low recurrence rates. Given the low level of clinical evidence available so far, these results should be interpreted with caution.