Literature DB >> 22688356

Preferences among diseases on a genetic susceptibility test for common health conditions: an ancillary study of the multiplex initiative.

C H Wade1, S Shiloh, J S Roberts, S Hensley Alford, T M Marteau, B B Biesecker.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22688356      PMCID： PMC3514560          DOI： 10.1159/000338114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN： 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


× No keyword cloud information.
  17 in total

1.  Challenges in the clinical application of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Matthew T Wheeler; Louanne Hudgins; Teri E Klein; Atul J Butte; Russ B Altman; Euan A Ashley; Henry T Greely
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Consent for newborn screening: the attitudes of health care providers.

Authors:  F A Miller; R Z Hayeems; J C Carroll; B Wilson; J Little; J Allanson; J P Bytautas; M Paynter; R Christensen; P Chaktraborty
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.

Authors:  Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; David Kaufman; Gail Geller; Lisa LeRoy; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Modelling decisions to undergo genetic testing for susceptibility to common health conditions: an ancillary study of the Multiplex Initiative.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Shoshana Shiloh; Samuel W Woolford; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Theresa M Marteau; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-06-09

5.  Putting science over supposition in the arena of personalized genomics.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.

Authors:  Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; David Kaufman; Gail Geller; Lisa LeRoy; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 8.  Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?

Authors:  L J Melton; E A Chrischilles; C Cooper; A W Lane; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Considerations for designing a prototype genetic test for use in translational research.

Authors:  C H Wade; C M McBride; S L R Kardia; L C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822
View more
  6 in total

1.  Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Michael J Bamshad; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.

Authors:  D L Boeldt; N J Schork; E J Topol; C S Bloss
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Beth A Tarini; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  On averages and peaks: how do people integrate attitudes about multiple diseases to reach a decision about multiplex genetic testing?

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Christopher H Wade; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Preferences for the provision of whole genome sequencing services among young adults.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Kailyn R Elliott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers.

Authors:  Deanna Alexis Carere; Mick P Couper; Scott D Crawford; Sarah S Kalia; Jake R Duggan; Tanya A Moreno; Joanna L Mountain; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 11.117
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.