PURPOSE: Despite recent advances in the management of high-grade and recurrent gliomas, survival remains poor. Antiangiogenic therapy has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of high-grade gliomas both in preclinical models and in clinical trials. We sought to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of sorafenib when combined with both radiation and temozolomide in the primary setting or radiation alone in the recurrent setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a preclinical study and an open-label phase I dose escalation trial. Multiple glioma cell lines were analyzed for viability after treatment with radiation, temozolomide, or sorafenib or combinations of them. For patients with primary disease, sorafenib was given concurrently with temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) and 60 Gy radiation, for 30 days after completion of radiation. For patients with recurrent disease, sorafenib was combined with a hypofractionated course of radiation (35 Gy in 10 fractions). RESULTS: Cell viability was significantly reduced with the combination of radiation, temozolomide, and sorafenib or radiation and sorafenib. Eighteen patients (11 in the primary cohort, 7 in the recurrent cohort) were enrolled onto this trial approved by the institutional review board. All patients completed the planned course of radiation therapy. The most common toxicities were hematologic, fatigue, and rash. There were 18 grade 3 or higher toxicities. The median overall survival was 18 months for the entire population. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib can be safely combined with radiation and temozolomide in patients with high-grade glioma and with radiation alone in patients with recurrent glioma. The recommended phase II dose of sorafenib is 200 mg twice daily when combined with temozolomide and radiation and 400 mg with radiation alone. To our knowledge, this is the first publication of concurrent sorafenib with radiation monotherapy or combined with radiation and temozolomide.
PURPOSE: Despite recent advances in the management of high-grade and recurrent gliomas, survival remains poor. Antiangiogenic therapy has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of high-grade gliomas both in preclinical models and in clinical trials. We sought to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of sorafenib when combined with both radiation and temozolomide in the primary setting or radiation alone in the recurrent setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a preclinical study and an open-label phase I dose escalation trial. Multiple glioma cell lines were analyzed for viability after treatment with radiation, temozolomide, or sorafenib or combinations of them. For patients with primary disease, sorafenib was given concurrently with temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) and 60 Gy radiation, for 30 days after completion of radiation. For patients with recurrent disease, sorafenib was combined with a hypofractionated course of radiation (35 Gy in 10 fractions). RESULTS: Cell viability was significantly reduced with the combination of radiation, temozolomide, and sorafenib or radiation and sorafenib. Eighteen patients (11 in the primary cohort, 7 in the recurrent cohort) were enrolled onto this trial approved by the institutional review board. All patients completed the planned course of radiation therapy. The most common toxicities were hematologic, fatigue, and rash. There were 18 grade 3 or higher toxicities. The median overall survival was 18 months for the entire population. CONCLUSIONS:Sorafenib can be safely combined with radiation and temozolomide in patients with high-grade glioma and with radiation alone in patients with recurrent glioma. The recommended phase II dose of sorafenib is 200 mg twice daily when combined with temozolomide and radiation and 400 mg with radiation alone. To our knowledge, this is the first publication of concurrent sorafenib with radiation monotherapy or combined with radiation and temozolomide.
Authors: Shannon E Fogh; David W Andrews; Jon Glass; Walter Curran; Charles Glass; Colin Champ; James J Evans; Terry Hyslop; Edward Pequignot; Beverly Downes; Eileen Comber; Mitchell Maltenfort; Adam P Dicker; Maria Werner-Wasik Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David A Reardon; James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; Katherine Peters; Sridharan Gururangan; John H Sampson; Jennifer Marcello; James E Herndon; Roger E McLendon; Dorothea Janney; Allan H Friedman; Darell D Bigner; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: John D Hainsworth; Thomas Ervin; Elke Friedman; Victor Priego; Patrick B Murphy; Bobby L Clark; Ruth E Lamar Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andrew W Suen; Sandra Galoforo; Brian Marples; Michele McGonagle; Laura Downing; Alvaro A Martinez; John M Robertson; George D Wilson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Xiao-Hong Ma; Shengfu Piao; Dan Wang; Quentin W McAfee; Katherine L Nathanson; Julian J Lum; Lin Z Li; Ravi K Amaravadi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: June L Chan; Susan W Lee; Benedick A Fraass; Daniel P Normolle; Harry S Greenberg; Larry R Junck; Stephen S Gebarski; Howard M Sandler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Zhi Sheng; Li Li; Lihua J Zhu; Thomas W Smith; Andrea Demers; Alonzo H Ross; Richard P Moser; Michael R Green Journal: Nat Med Date: 2010-05-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Henry S Friedman; Michael D Prados; Patrick Y Wen; Tom Mikkelsen; David Schiff; Lauren E Abrey; W K Alfred Yung; Nina Paleologos; Martin K Nicholas; Randy Jensen; James Vredenburgh; Jane Huang; Maoxia Zheng; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan Drappatz; Andrew D Norden; Eric T Wong; Lisa M Doherty; Debra C Lafrankie; Abigail Ciampa; Santosh Kesari; Christine Sceppa; Mary Gerard; Phuong Phan; David Schiff; Tracy T Batchelor; Keith L Ligon; Geoffrey Young; Alona Muzikansky; Stephanie E Weiss; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Zygogianni; M Protopapa; A Kougioumtzopoulou; F Simopoulou; S Nikoloudi; V Kouloulias Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Jennifer Clarke; Elizabeth Neil; Robert Terziev; Philip Gutin; Igor Barani; Thomas Kaley; Andrew B Lassman; Timothy A Chan; Josh Yamada; Lisa DeAngelis; Ase Ballangrud; Robert Young; Katherine S Panageas; Kathryn Beal; Antonio Omuro Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A F Hottinger; A Ben Aissa; V Espeli; D Squiban; N Dunkel; M I Vargas; T Hundsberger; N Mach; K Schaller; D C Weber; A Bodmer; P-Y Dietrich Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 7.640