Literature DB >> 20564147

Concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide followed by temozolomide and sorafenib in the first-line treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

John D Hainsworth1, Thomas Ervin, Elke Friedman, Victor Priego, Patrick B Murphy, Bobby L Clark, Ruth E Lamar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, when added to standard radiotherapy and temozolomide in the first-line treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
METHODS: After initial surgical resection or biopsy, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme received concurrent radiotherapy (2.0 grays [Gy]/day; total dose, 60 Gy) and temozolomide (at a dose of 75 mg/m2 orally daily), followed by 6 months of maintenance therapy with temozolomide (at a dose of 150 mg/m2 orally on Days 1-5 every 28 days) and sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily). Patients were re-evaluated every 2 months; the primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were treated; 34 had undergone previous debulking surgery. Nineteen patients withdrew from treatment before the initiation of maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib (12 because of early tumor progression). Twenty-eight patients (60% of enrolled patients) received 4 months of maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib, and 9 patients (19%) completed the planned 6 months of maintenance therapy. The median PFS for the entire group was 6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.7-7 months), with a 1-year PFS rate of 16%. The median overall survival was 12 months (95%CI, 7.2-16 months). Maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib was found to be well tolerated by most patients, with no grade 3/4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]) reported to occur in >10% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of sorafenib did not appear to improve the efficacy of treatment when compared with the results expected with standard therapy. A substantial percentage of patients (40%) did not receive any maintenance sorafenib, most often because of early disease progression. The administration of angiogenesis inhibitors concurrently with radiotherapy and temozolomide may optimize the opportunity to improve therapy. Copyright (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20564147     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  50 in total

Review 1.  Antiangiogenic therapies for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Isabel Arrillaga-Romany; Andrew D Norden
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Tracy T Batchelor; David A Reardon; John F de Groot; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Pathway inhibition: emerging molecular targets for treating glioblastoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Markus Weiler; Tracy Batchelor; Alfred W K Yung; Michael Platten
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Cediranib enhances control of wild type EGFR and EGFRvIII-expressing gliomas through potentiating temozolomide, but not through radiosensitization: implications for the clinic.

Authors:  Phyllis R Wachsberger; Richard Yaacov Lawrence; Yi Liu; Xu Xia; Barbara Andersen; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  A phase I study of the combination of sorafenib with temozolomide and radiation therapy for the treatment of primary and recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Robert B Den; Mitchell Kamrava; Zhi Sheng; Maria Werner-Wasik; Erin Dougherty; Michelle Marinucchi; Yaacov R Lawrence; Sarah Hegarty; Terry Hyslop; David W Andrews; Jon Glass; David P Friedman; Michael R Green; Kevin Camphausen; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Overcoming therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma: the way forward.

Authors:  Satoru Osuka; Erwin G Van Meir
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Glioblastoma in Adults.

Authors:  Ding Fang Chuang; Xuling Lin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Glioblastoma targeted therapy: updated approaches from recent biological insights.

Authors:  M Touat; A Idbaih; M Sanson; K L Ligon
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Phase I/II study of sorafenib in combination with temsirolimus for recurrent glioblastoma or gliosarcoma: North American Brain Tumor Consortium study 05-02.

Authors:  Eudocia Q Lee; John Kuhn; Kathleen R Lamborn; Lauren Abrey; Lisa M DeAngelis; Frank Lieberman; H Ian Robins; Susan M Chang; W K Alfred Yung; Jan Drappatz; Minesh P Mehta; Victor A Levin; Kenneth Aldape; Janet E Dancey; John J Wright; Michael D Prados; Timothy F Cloughesy; Mark R Gilbert; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 10.  Radiation-agent combinations for glioblastoma: challenges in drug development and future considerations.

Authors:  Charles A Kunos; Evanthia Galanis; Jeffrey Buchsbaum; Qian Shi; Lewis C Strauss; C Norman Coleman; Mansoor M Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.