Literature DB >> 22686181

Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Samer S Bessa1, Khaled M Katri, Wael N Abdel-Salam, El-Saed A El-Kayal, Tarek A Tawfik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia with that performed with the patients under general anesthesia in the management of symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty patients were prospectively randomized to either the spinal anesthesia DCLC group (SA-DCLC group) or the general anesthesia DCLC group (GA-DCLC group). Intraoperative events related to spinal anesthesia, postoperative complications, and pain scores were recorded. The incidences of both overnight stay and readmissions were also recorded. Patient satisfaction values as to the anesthetic technique and same-day discharge were assessed by direct questionnaire at the end of the first postoperative week.
RESULTS: In both groups, all procedures were completed laparoscopically. In the SA-DCLC group, there were 4 (4.4%) anesthetic conversions due to intolerable right shoulder pain, and those 4 patients were excluded from further analysis. In the SA-DCLC group, all patients were discharged on the same day. Overnight stay was required in 8 patients (8.9%) in the GA-DCLC group (P<.001). The cause of overnight stay was nausea and vomiting in 4 patients (4.4%), inadequate pain control in 3 patients (3.3%), and unexplained hypotension in 1 patient (1.1%). Readmission was required in 1 patient (1.1%) in the GA-DCLC group. The difference in patient satisfaction scores with regard to both anesthetic technique and same-day discharge was not statistically significant between the two groups studied.
CONCLUSIONS: DCLC performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia is feasible and safe and is associated with less postoperative pain and lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and therefore a lower incidence of overnight stay compared with that performed with the patient under general anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22686181     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  13 in total

1.  Small-incision cholecystectomy (through a cylinder retractor) under local anaesthesia and sedation: a prospective observational study of five hundred consecutive cases.

Authors:  Enrique J Grau-Talens; José Jacob Motos-Micó; Rafael Giraldo-Rubio; José M Aparicio-Gallego; José F Salgado; Carlos D Ibáñez; Pablo G Mangione-Castro; Martina Arribas-Jurado; Carlos Jordán-Chaves; Javier Arias-Díaz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia: Retrospective Analysis of 96 Patients.

Authors:  Murat Bilgi; Esin Erkan Alshair; Hüseyin Göksu; Osman Sevim
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-09-09

3.  Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Spinal Anaesthesia vs. General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomised Study.

Authors:  Kalaivani V; Vinayak S Pujari; Sreevathsa M R; Bharati V Hiremath; Yatish Bevinaguddaiah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-08-20

4.  Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Hung; Wei-Hung Chen; Yu-Hsuan Shih; Kuo-Chuan Hung
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-07-17

5.  Comparison between general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in attenuation of stress response in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Writuparna Das; Susmita Bhattacharya; Sarmila Ghosh; Swarnamukul Saha; Suchismita Mallik; Saswati Pal
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Thoracic combined spinal epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Nandita Mehta; Mohd Reidwan Dar; Shikha Sharma; Kuldeep Singh Mehta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Turgut Donmez; Vuslat Muslu Erdem; Sinan Uzman; Dogan Yildirim; Huseyin Avaroglu; Sina Ferahman; Oguzhan Sunamak
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 1.859

8.  Comparison of Postoperative Events between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xian-Xue Wang; Quan Zhou; Dao-Bo Pan; Hui-Wei Deng; Ai-Guo Zhou; Hua-Jing Guo; Fu-Rong Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Gan Yu; Qin Wen; Li Qiu; Li Bo; Jiang Yu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Is segmental epidural anaesthesia an optimal technique for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Devangi A Parikh; Geeta A Patkar; Mayur S Ganvir; Ajit Sawant; Bharati A Tendolkar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.