Literature DB >> 22685117

Coronary computed tomographic angiography and risk of all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction in subjects without chest pain syndrome from the CONFIRM Registry (coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry).

Iksung Cho1, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Ji Min Sung, Michael J Pencina, Fay Y Lin, Allison M Dunning, Stephan Achenbach, Mouaz Al-Mallah, Daniel S Berman, Matthew J Budoff, Tracy Q Callister, Benjamin J W Chow, Augustin Delago, Martin Hadamitzky, Joerg Hausleiter, Erica Maffei, Filippo Cademartiri, Philipp Kaufmann, Leslee J Shaw, Gil L Raff, Kavitha M Chinnaiyan, Todd C Villines, Victor Cheng, Khurram Nasir, Millie Gomez, James K Min.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of coronary computed tomographic angiography (cCTA) in subjects without chest pain syndrome (CPS) has not been established. We investigated the prognostic value of coronary artery disease detection by cCTA and determined the incremental risk stratification benefit of cCTA findings compared with clinical risk factor scoring and coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) for individuals without CPS. METHODS AND
RESULTS: An open-label, 12-center, 6-country observational registry of 27 125 consecutive patients undergoing cCTA and CACS was queried, and 7590 individuals without CPS or history of coronary artery disease met the inclusion criteria. All-cause mortality and the composite of all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction were measured. During a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range, 18-35 months), all-cause mortality occurred in 136 individuals. After risk adjustment, compared with individuals without evidence of coronary artery disease by cCTA, individuals with obstructive 2- and 3-vessel disease or left main coronary artery disease experienced higher rates of death and composite outcome (P<0.05 for both). Both CACS and cCTA significantly improved the performance of standard risk factor prediction models for all-cause mortality and the composite outcome (likelihood ratio P<0.05 for all), but the incremental discriminatory value associated with their inclusion was more pronounced for the composite outcome and for CACS (C statistic for model with risk factors only was 0.71; for risk factors plus CACS, 0.75; for risk factors plus CACS plus cCTA, 0.77). The net reclassification improvement resulting from the addition of cCTA to a model based on standard risk factors and CACS was negligible.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the prognosis for individuals without CPS is stratified by cCTA, the additional risk-predictive advantage by cCTA is not clinically meaningful compared with a risk model based on CACS. Therefore, at present, the application of cCTA for risk assessment of individuals without CPS should not be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22685117     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.081380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  62 in total

1.  Significance of a positive family history for coronary heart disease in patients with a zero coronary artery calcium score (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

Authors:  Randy Cohen; Matthew Budoff; Robyn L McClelland; Stefan Sillau; Gregory Burke; Michael Blaha; Moyses Szklo; Seth Uretsky; Alan Rozanski; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  New insights from major prospective cohort studies with cardiac CT.

Authors:  Sumbal A Janjua; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Christopher B Fordyce; Pamela S Douglas; Rhonda S Roberts; Udo Hoffmann; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Manesh R Patel; Christopher B Granger; John Kostis; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; James E Udelson
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  The United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline on chest pain of recent onset: A United States perspective.

Authors:  James E Udelson; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Screening coronary CT angiography: possibilities and pitfalls.

Authors:  Seung Min Yoo; Hwa Yeon Lee; Charles S White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Coronary plaque imaging by coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Akira Sato
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28

9.  Incremental prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography over coronary artery calcium score for risk prediction of major adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic diabetic individuals.

Authors:  James K Min; Troy M Labounty; Millie J Gomez; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Benjamin Chow; Ricardo Cury; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Jorg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 10.  What is the role of calcium scoring in the age of coronary computed tomographic angiography?

Authors:  Parag H Joshi; Michael J Blaha; Roger S Blumenthal; Ron Blankstein; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.