Literature DB >> 22684218

Fibrotic focus and hypoxia in male breast cancer.

Robert Kornegoor1, Anoek H J Verschuur-Maes, Horst Buerger, Marieke C H Hogenes, Peter C de Bruin, Joost J Oudejans, Bernd Hinrichs, Paul J van Diest.   

Abstract

Fibrotic focus is a scar-like lesion near the center of a carcinoma and has been associated with high-grade, lymph node metastases and poor survival in female breast cancers. Hypoxia is suggested to be the crucial link between fibrotic focus and aggressive tumor phenotype and is also itself a poor prognostic marker. We here set out to study fibrotic focus and hypoxia in male breast cancer for the first time. In a group of 134 male breast cancer patients, the presence and size of a fibrotic focus and the expression of three hypoxia-related immunohistochemical stainings, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, carbonic anhydrase IX and Glut-1 were studied in correlation with clinicopathological features and prognosis. Fibrotic focus was seen in 25% of the male breast cancer cases and was correlated with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α overexpression (P=0.023), high grade (P=0.005), high mitotic activity (P=0.005) and lymph node metastases (P=0.037). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-positive tumors were more often high grade (P=0.003) and HER2 amplified (P=0.005). Glut-1 expression was also more common in grade 3 tumors (P=0.038), but no association between carbonic anhydrase IX and any clinicopathological feature was found. Fibrotic focus >8 mm and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α overexpression were correlated with decreased patients' outcome (P=0.035 and 0.008, respectively). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α overexpression was an independent and the most powerful predictor of survival in multivariate analysis (P=0.029; hazard ratio 2.5). In conclusion, the presence of a fibrotic focus is associated with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α overexpression, and both are associated with aggressive tumor phenotype and poor survival in male breast cancer. These markers seem to have similar clinical importance as previously reported in female breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22684218     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of the R2* value in invasive ductal carcinoma with respect to hypoxic-related prognostic factors using iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares emission (IDEAL).

Authors:  Mari Miyata; Takatoshi Aoki; Shohei Shimajiri; Atsuji Matsuyama; Shunsuke Kinoshita; Masami Fujii; Takefumi Katsuki; Yuzuru Inoue; Yoshika Nagata; Yuko Tashima; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Expression of connective tissue growth factor in male breast cancer: clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic value.

Authors:  Miangela M Lacle; Paul J van Diest; Roel Goldschmeding; Elsken van der Wall; Tri Q Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The potential of hypoxia markers as target for breast molecular imaging--a systematic review and meta-analysis of human marker expression.

Authors:  Arthur Adams; Aram S A van Brussel; Jeroen F Vermeulen; Willem P Th M Mali; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Sjoerd G Elias
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Association between the degree of fibrosis in fibrotic focus and the unfavorable clinicopathological prognostic features of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yongfu Li; Yuhan Wei; Wenjun Tang; Jingru Luo; Minghua Wang; Haifeng Lin; Hong Guo; Yuling Ma; Jun Zhang; Qin Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Understanding metabolic alterations and heterogeneity in cancer progression through validated immunodetection of key molecular components: a case of carbonic anhydrase IX.

Authors:  Martina Takacova; Ivana Kajanova; Maria Kolarcikova; Jana Lapinova; Miriam Zatovicova; Silvia Pastorekova
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Tumor budding and fibrotic focus-proposed grading system for tumor budding in invasive carcinoma no special type of the breast.

Authors:  Miyuki Hiratsuka; Takahiro Hasebe; Toshiaki Saeki; Yuki Ichinose; Ayaka Sakakibara; Akihiro Fujimoto; Noriko Wakui; Satomi Shibasaki; Masataka Hirasaki; Masanori Yasuda; Akemi Nukui; Hiroko Shimada; Hideki Yokogawa; Kazuo Matsuura; Takashi Hojo; Akihiko Osaki
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.535

7.  Differential expression of growth factor receptors and membrane-bound tumor markers for imaging in male and female breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeroen F Vermeulen; Robert Kornegoor; Elsken van der Wall; Petra van der Groep; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prognostic value of mitotic index and Bcl2 expression in male breast cancer.

Authors:  Miangela M Lacle; Carmen van der Pol; Arjen Witkamp; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Simon J A van Kuijk; Ala Yaromina; Ruud Houben; Raymon Niemans; Philippe Lambin; Ludwig J Dubois
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Lymphangiogenesis in Breast Cancer Correlates with Matrix Stiffness on Shear-Wave Elastography.

Authors:  Yoon Jin Cha; Ji Hyun Youk; Baek Gil Kim; Woo Hee Jung; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.759

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.