Literature DB >> 22683721

Generation of the VESPA response to rapid contrast fluctuations is dominated by striate cortex: evidence from retinotopic mapping.

E C Lalor1, S P Kelly, J J Foxe.   

Abstract

The VESPA (visual-evoked spread spectrum analysis) method derives an impulse response function of the visual system from scalp electroencephalographic (EEG) data using the controlled modulation of some feature of a visual stimulus. Recent research using VESPA responses to modulations of stimulus contrast has provided new insights into both early visual attention mechanisms and the specificity of visual-processing deficits in schizophrenia. To allow a fuller interpretation of these and future findings, it is necessary to further characterize the VESPA in terms of its underlying cortical generators. To that end, we here examine spatio-temporal variations in the components of the VESPA as a function of stimulus location. We found that the first two VESPA components (C1/P1) each have a posterior dorsal midline focus and reverse in polarity across the horizontal meridian, consistent with retinotopic projections to calcarine cortex (V1) for the stimulus locations tested. Furthermore, the focal scalp topography of the VESPA was strikingly constant across the entire C1-P1 timeframe (50-120 ms) for each stimulus location, with negligible global scalp activity visible at the zero-crossing dividing the two. This indicates a common focal source underpinning both components, which was further supported by a significant correlation between C1 and P1 amplitudes across subjects (r=0.54; p<0.05). These results, along with factors implicit in the method of derivation of the contrast-VESPA, lead us to conclude that these responses are dominated by activity from striate cortex. We discuss the implications of this finding for previous and future research using the VESPA.
Copyright © 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22683721      PMCID: PMC3407841          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.05.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  47 in total

1.  Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Andrew Charles James
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system.

Authors:  M T Schmolesky; Y Wang; D P Hanes; K G Thompson; S Leutgeb; J D Schall; A G Leventhal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque.

Authors:  C E Schroeder; A D Mehta; S J Givre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1998 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G Sclar; J H Maunsell; P Lennie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli.

Authors:  Justin M Ales; Jacob L Yates; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

8.  Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.

Authors:  John J Foxe; E Cathrine Strugstad; Pejman Sehatpour; Sophie Molholm; Wren Pasieka; Charles E Schroeder; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Abnormal timing of visual feedback processing in young adults with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Chantal Kemner; John J Foxe; Judith E Tankink; René S Kahn; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Spatial attention modulates initial afferent activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; John J Foxe
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  5 in total

1.  Isolating early cortical generators of visual-evoked activity: a systems identification approach.

Authors:  Jeremy W Murphy; Simon P Kelly; John J Foxe; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual sensory processing deficits in schizophrenia: is there anything to the magnocellular account?

Authors:  Edmund C Lalor; Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Menahem I Krakowski; John J Foxe
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Understanding individual face discrimination by means of fast periodic visual stimulation.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Atypical cortical representation of peripheral visual space in children with an autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Frey; Sophie Molholm; Edmund C Lalor; Natalie N Russo; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Delayed P100-Like Latencies in Multiple Sclerosis: A Preliminary Investigation Using Visual Evoked Spread Spectrum Analysis.

Authors:  Hanni S M Kiiski; Sinéad Ní Riada; Edmund C Lalor; Nuno R Gonçalves; Hugh Nolan; Robert Whelan; Róisín Lonergan; Siobhán Kelly; Marie Claire O'Brien; Katie Kinsella; Jessica Bramham; Teresa Burke; Seán Ó Donnchadha; Michael Hutchinson; Niall Tubridy; Richard B Reilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.