Literature DB >> 22683001

Cell specific ultrasound effects are dose and frequency dependent.

A Schuster1, T Schwab, M Bischof, M Klotz, R Lemor, C Degel, K-H Schäfer.   

Abstract

Ultrasound is widely used in clinical practice, mostly in diagnostic studies, but increasingly in therapeutic applications as well. This may be the case in acceleration of wound healing or treatment of cancer. Still, little is known about the direct effect of frequency or energy density of the ultrasound upon the cells themselves. We therefore investigated the impact of three different protocols using high, medium and low energy densities at three different frequencies on normal endothelial and epithelial as well as carcinoma cell lines (neuroblastoma and adenocarcinoma cell lines). Proliferation of endothelial and epithelial cell lines was significantly increased depending on the frequency and energy density applied. No influence on actin cytoskeleton formation was seen in these cells after treatment, while a significant decrease in the density of microvilli and the length of filopodia in the epithelial cell line could be noted. The proliferation rate of the carcinoma cell lines was reduced and cells destroyed. Apoptosis was induced in the adenocarcinoma cells after ultrasound exposure. Additionally, the expression of neurofilament was increased in neuroblastoma cells as evidence of beginning differentiation. So, different settings of frequency and energy density in an ultrasonic treatment protocol lead to different impacts on proliferation, morphology and differentiation and might be used to stimulate or inhibit the growth of individual cell types.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22683001     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2012.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  7 in total

1.  Frequency-induced morphology alterations in microconfined biological cells.

Authors:  Hritwick Banerjee; Bibhas Roy; Kaustav Chaudhury; Babji Srinivasan; Suman Chakraborty; Hongliang Ren
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A frequency-based hypothesis for mechanically targeting and selectively attacking cancer cells.

Authors:  M Fraldi; A Cugno; L Deseri; K Dayal; N M Pugno
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Biological Effects and Applications of Bulk and Surface Acoustic Waves on In Vitro Cultured Mammal Cells: New Insights.

Authors:  Agathe Figarol; Lucile Olive; Olivier Joubert; Luc Ferrari; Bertrand H Rihn; Frédéric Sarry; Denis Beyssen
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Low intensity ultrasound promotes the sensitivity of rat brain glioma to Doxorubicin by down-regulating the expressions of p-glucoprotein and multidrug resistance protein 1 in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Ke Xu; Yonghua Bi; Guibo Yu; Siwei Wang; Xun Qi; Hongshan Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of acoustic standing waves on cellular viability and metabolic activity.

Authors:  Victoria Levario-Diaz; Pradeep Bhaskar; M Carmen Galan; Adrian C Barnes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Dual-Mode Chemo-Sonodynamic Therapy by Low-Energy Ultrasound.

Authors:  Jingjing Wang; Yajing Jiao; Yiran Shao
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Effect of 1-MHz ultrasound on the proinflammatory interleukin-6 secretion in human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Sabrina Giantulli; Elisabetta Tortorella; Francesco Brasili; Susanna Scarpa; Barbara Cerroni; Gaio Paradossi; Angelico Bedini; Stefania Morrone; Ida Silvestri; Fabio Domenici
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.