Literature DB >> 26378121

A frequency-based hypothesis for mechanically targeting and selectively attacking cancer cells.

M Fraldi1, A Cugno2, L Deseri3, K Dayal4, N M Pugno5.   

Abstract

Experimental studies recently performed on single cancer and healthy cells have demonstrated that the former are about 70% softer than the latter, regardless of the cell lines and the measurement technique used for determining the mechanical properties. At least in principle, the difference in cell stiffness might thus be exploited to create mechanical-based targeting strategies for discriminating neoplastic transformations within human cell populations and for designing innovative complementary tools to cell-specific molecular tumour markers, leading to possible applications in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer diseases. With the aim of characterizing and gaining insight into the overall frequency response of single-cell systems to mechanical stimuli (typically low-intensity therapeutic ultrasound), a generalized viscoelastic paradigm, combining classical and spring-pot-based models, is introduced for modelling this problem by neglecting the cascade of mechanobiological events involving the cell nucleus, cytoskeleton, elastic membrane and cytosol. Theoretical results show that differences in stiffness, experimentally observed ex vivo and in vitro, allow healthy and cancer cells to be discriminated, by highlighting frequencies (from tens to hundreds of kilohertz) associated with resonance-like phenomena—prevailing on thermal fluctuations—that could be helpful in targeting and selectively attacking tumour cells.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; cell mechanics; ultrasound; viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26378121      PMCID: PMC4614503          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  39 in total

1.  Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy.

Authors:  M Lekka; P Laidler; D Gil; J Lekki; Z Stachura; A Z Hrynkiewicz
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells.

Authors:  Nathalie Caille; Olivier Thoumine; Yanik Tardy; Jean-Jacques Meister
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Functional architecture in the cell nucleus.

Authors:  M Dundr; T Misteli
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials.

Authors:  G Bao; S Suresh
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Gas bubble and solid sphere motion in elastic media in response to acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  Yurii A Ilinskii; G Douglas Meegan; Evgenia A Zabolotskaya; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Nonthermal effects of therapeutic ultrasound: the frequency resonance hypothesis.

Authors:  Lennart D Johns
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Single cell measurement of micro-viscosity by ratio imaging of fluorescence of styrylpyridinium probe.

Authors:  Barbara Wandelt; Piotr Cywinski; Graham D Darling; Brent R Stranix
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 10.618

8.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype.

Authors:  Matthew J Paszek; Nastaran Zahir; Kandice R Johnson; Johnathon N Lakins; Gabriela I Rozenberg; Amit Gefen; Cynthia A Reinhart-King; Susan S Margulies; Micah Dembo; David Boettiger; Daniel A Hammer; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Effect of 5-fluorouracil, Optison and ultrasound on MCF-7 cell viability.

Authors:  Olga V Chumakova; Anton V Liopo; B Mark Evers; Rinat O Esenaliev
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Role of intracellular calcium ions and reactive oxygen species in apoptosis induced by ultrasound.

Authors:  Hidemi Honda; Takashi Kondo; Qing-Li Zhao; Loreto B Feril; Hiroshi Kitagawa
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  7 in total

1.  Tumor ablation using low-intensity ultrasound and sound excitable drug.

Authors:  Ching-Hsuan Tung; Myung Shin Han; Young Kim; Jianjun Qi; Brian E O'Neill
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Promoter hypermethylation as a mechanism for Lamin A/C silencing in a subset of neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  Ines Rauschert; Fabian Aldunate; Jens Preussner; Miguel Arocena-Sutz; Vanina Peraza; Mario Looso; Juan C Benech; Ruben Agrelo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of acoustic standing waves on cellular viability and metabolic activity.

Authors:  Victoria Levario-Diaz; Pradeep Bhaskar; M Carmen Galan; Adrian C Barnes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Ultrasound waves in tumors via needle irradiation for precise medicine.

Authors:  Antonello Cutolo; Angelo Rosario Carotenuto; Maria Alessandra Cutolo; Arsenio Cutolo; Martino Giaquinto; Stefania Palumbo; Andrea Cusano; Massimiliano Fraldi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Actomyosin contractility and buckling of microtubules in nucleation, growth and disassembling of focal adhesions.

Authors:  S Palumbo; E Benvenuti; M Fraldi
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2022-05-25

6.  Imaging non-classical mechanical responses of lipid membranes using molecular rotors.

Authors:  Miguel Páez-Pérez; Ismael López-Duarte; Aurimas Vyšniauskas; Nicholas J Brooks; Marina K Kuimova
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 7.  Biomechanics of Neutrophil Tethers.

Authors:  Andrea Cugno; Alex Marki; Klaus Ley
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.