Literature DB >> 16488726

Preoperative 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography standardized uptake values predict survival after esophageal adenocarcinoma resection.

Nabil Rizk1, Robert J Downey, Timothy Akhurst, Mithat Gonen, Manjit S Bains, Steven Larson, Valerie Rusch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical staging modalities for esophageal cancer are inaccurate at determining prognosis, especially in early-stage patients. We performed a retrospective review of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma imaged by positron emission tomography before surgical resection to determine whether 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake predicted overall survival independently of clinical and pathologic stage.
METHODS: The study is a retrospective review of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus treated by surgery. All patients were imaged with computed tomography and positron emission tomography imaging, and most patients had an endoscopic ultrasound. We compared positron emission tomography standardized uptake values (SUVmax) with clinical and pathologic stage and survival. Prognostic variables were assessed by log-rank test, and survival by the method of Kaplan and Meier.
RESULTS: From January 1996 through June 2004, 50 patients meeting study eligibility criteria were analyzed. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 27 months. The median SUVmax was 4.5. Stratification of patients by the median SUVmax predicted survival. The 3-year survival was 57% for patients with an SUVmax greater than 4.5 and 95% for patients with an SUVmax of 4.5 or less (p = 0.02). The survival advantage of the SUVmax 4.5 or less group was also seen in clinically early-stage patients (defined as no adenopathy on computed tomography and positron emission tomography, and by endoscopic ultrasound T1-2 N0), as well as in patients with pathologically early-stage disease (T-2 N0).
CONCLUSIONS: In surgically managed esophageal adenocarcinoma patients, SUVmax predicts overall survival. Moreover, SUVmax identifies patients who have a poor prognosis from a subset of patients that would otherwise be considered to have early-stage disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16488726     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.09.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  41 in total

1.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A case of advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Celina Ang; Yelena Y Janjigian; Ali Shamseddine; Ayman Tawil; Maeve A Lowery; Andrew Intlekofer; Walid Faraj; Ashwaq Al-Olayan; Laura Tang; Eileen M O'Reilly; Fady Geara; Aghiad Al-Kutoubi; David P Kelsen; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03

3.  Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Michael Christensen; Jonathan D Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Kevin Crawford; Oleh Haluszka; Jeffrey Tokar; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Alan Maurer; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Preoperative 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts early recurrence after pancreatic cancer resection.

Authors:  Kojun Okamoto; Isamu Koyama; Mitsuo Miyazawa; Yasuko Toshimitsu; Masayasu Aikawa; Katsuya Okada; Etsuko Imabayashi; Hiroshi Matsuda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  The added value of metabolic imaging with FDG-PET in oesophageal cancer: prognostic role and prediction of response to treatment.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Correlation of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements between dedicated workstations and a PACS-integrated workstation system.

Authors:  Gustavo S P Meirelles; Peter Kijewski; Timothy Akhurst
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Clinical significance of primary lesion FDG uptake for choice between oesophagectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection for resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Masayuki Nakajo; Atsushi Tani; Yoriko Kajiya; Shunji Shimaoka; Akio Matsuda; Tatsuyuki Nioh; Tohru Nihara; Toyokuni Suenaga; Sadao Tanaka; Hiroshi Shirahama; Michiyo Higashi; Chihaya Koriyama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Phase II randomized study of two regimens of sequentially administered mitomycin C and irinotecan in patients with unresectable esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Maryam B Lustberg; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Donn Young; Gregory Otterson; William Burak; Abbas Abbas; Barbara McCracken-Bussa; Mark E Lustberg; Miguel A Villalona-Calero
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Update: modern approaches to the treatment of localized esophageal cancer.

Authors:  James Welsh; Arya Amini; Anna Likhacheva; Jeremy Erasmus J; Daniel Gomez; Marta Davila; Reza J Mehran; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jeffrey Lee H; Manoop S Bhutani; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  State-of-the-art molecular imaging in esophageal cancer management: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Jolinta Lin; Seth Kligerman; Rakhi Goel; Payam Sajedi; Mohan Suntharalingam; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.