| Literature DB >> 22682522 |
Jamela Boder1, Fathi Abdalla, Mohamed Elfagieh, Abdelbaset Buhmeida, Yrjö Collan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the relationship of the apoptotic activity index (AI) and the standardized mitotic-apoptotic ratio (SMI/AI) with clinicopathological features and prognosis in Libyan female breast cancer (BC) patients. We then compared our results with corresponding results in Finnish and Nigerian female BC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22682522 PMCID: PMC3536673 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Average estimates of apoptotic activity, and balance between proliferative and apoptotic activity in BCs, in different subgroups of 130 Libyan female BC patients
| Whole material | 130 | 12.8 (9.6) | | 2.8 (2.0) | |
| Age groups | |||||
| <40 | 49 | 13.3 (9.5) | | 2.9 (2.2) | |
| 40-49 | 32 | 9.9 (9.9) | 0.12 | 2.4 (1.5) | 0.38 |
| ≥50 | 49 | 14.3 (9.4) | | 3.0 (2.0) | |
| Menopausal status | |||||
| Premenopausal | 80 | 12.07 (9.7) | | 2.76 (2.0) | 0.54 |
| (age <50 yrs) | | | 0.26 | | |
| Postmenopausal | 50 | 14.05 (9.5) | | 2.98 (2.0) | |
| (age ≥ 50 yrs) | | | | | |
| Tumor size | |||||
| <3 | 8 | 4.5 (5.7) | 0.011 | 2.8 (1.9) | 0.75 |
| ≥3 | 122 | 13.4 ( 9.6) | 3.2 | (2.2) | |
| Lymph node (LN) status | |||||
| LN- | 27 | 8.3 (7.0) | 0.005 | 2.5 (1.3) | 0.73 |
| LN+ | 103 | 14.0 (9.9) | | 2.9 (2.1) | |
| Clinical stage | |||||
| Stage1 | 6 | 5.0 (5.1) | 3.0 (2.3) | | |
| Stage 2 | 44 | 10.2 (6.7) | 0.009 | 2.4 (1.0) | 0.30 |
| Stage 3 | 64 | 14.5 (10.5) | | 2.9 (1.9) | |
| Stage 4 | 16 | 16.4 (11.4) | | 3.4 (0.8) | |
| Histological grade | |||||
| 1 | 10 | 5.9 (5.7) | 0.035 | 2.0 (1.1) | 0.43 |
| 2 | 70 | 12.7 (7.4) | | 3.0 (2.1) | |
| 3 | 50 | 14.5 (9.0) | | 2.8 (1.8) | |
| Histological type | |||||
| Invasive ductal | 95 | 13.3 (10.6) | 0.61 | 2.9 (2.0) | 0.61 |
| Invasive lobular | 13 | 10.8 (5.8) | | 3.2 (2.5) | |
| Other carcinomas | 22 | 12.0 (6.7) | 2.8 (2.0) | ||
AI apoptotic activity index, BC breast cancer, SMI/AI standardized mitotic-apoptotic ratio, SD standard deviation.
Mean estimates of apoptotic activity in different TNM and clinical stages of 130 Libyan female BC patients, (*T= diameter of tumor, **N = lymph node status, ***M= distant metastasis; present or absent)
| *T Stage | | | 0.007 | | 0.06 |
| T1 | 6 | 4.0 (5.5) | | 3.4 (2.6) | |
| T2 | 45 | 10.4 (6.8) | | 2.5 (1.2) | |
| T3 | 44 | 15.5 (10.7) | | 2.8 (2.0) | |
| T4 | 35 | 14.1 (10.6) | | 3.3 (2.6) | |
| **N Stage | | | 0.007 | | 0.02 |
| N0 | 27 | 8.3 (7.0) | | 2.5 (1.3) | |
| N1 | 69 | 12.3 (8.2) | | 3.0 (2.0) | |
| N2 | 32 | 17.0 (12.2) | | 2.7 (2.2) | |
| N3 | 2 | 26.0 (4.6) | | 2.4 (1.4) | |
| ***M Stage | | | 0.02 | | 0.013 |
| M0 | 114 | 12.3 (9.3) | | 2.7 (1.6) | |
| M1 | 16 | 16.4 (11.4) | | 4.0 (3.4) | |
| Clinical stage | | | | | |
| Stage 1 | 6 | 5.0 (5.1) | | 3.0 (2.3) | |
| Stage 2 | 44 | 10.2 (6.7) | 0.009 | 2.4 (1.0) | 0.30 |
| Stage 3 | 64 | 14.5 (10.5) | | 2.9 (1.9) | |
| Stage 4 | 16 | 16.4 (11.4) | 3.4 (0.8) |
Figure 1Distribution of SMI/AI values in 130 Libyan female BCs.
Figure 2Distributions of AI in 130 cases of Libyan BC.
Figure 3Correlation between SMI and AI in 130 Libyan female BCs. Clearly, there is a correlation (P <0.001), but the correlation coefficient is low (r = 0.193).
Average estimates of apoptotic activity among 130 Libyan female breast cancer patients
| Whole material | 300 | 9.6 (14.8) | | 285 | 5.2 (6.1) | | 130 | 12.8 (9.6) | |
| Menopausal status | |||||||||
| Premenopausal | 223 | 10.1 (16.3) | 0.333 | 93 | 5.6 (6.4) | 0.44 | 80 | 12.07 (9.7) | 0.26 |
| Postmenopausal | 77 | 8.2 (9.3) | | 192 | 5.0 (6.0) | | 50 | 14.05 (9.5) | |
| Lymph node status | |||||||||
| LN- | 65 | 7.6 (10.6) | 0.185 | 188 | 5.3 (6.8) | 0.514 | 27 | 8.3(7.0) | 0.005 |
| LN+ | 235 | 10.2 (15.7) | | 97 | 4.8 (4.8) | | 103 | 14.0 (9.9) | |
| Histological grade | |||||||||
| 1 | 44 | 4.0 (7.1) | | 67 | 2.9 (4.8) | | 10 | 5.9 (5.7) | |
| 2 | 119 | 8.6 (11.5) | 0.012 | 173 | 4.5 (4.9) | <0.001 | 70 | 12.7 (7.4) | 0.035 |
| 3 | 137 | 12.4 (19.8) | | 45 | 11.1 (8.4) | | 50 | 14.5 (9.0) | |
| Invasive ductal | 242 | 10.3 (16.7) | 0.070 | 231 | 5.9 (6.5) | 0.017 | 95 | 13.3 (10.6) | 0.35 |
| Other carcinoma | 58 | 5.3 (8.4) | | 54 | 2.1 (2.3) | | 35 | 11.5 (6.3) | |
| Stage | |||||||||
| 1 | 65 | 7.6 (10.6) | | 95 | 4.5 (5.1) | | 6 | 5.0 (5.1) | |
| 2 | 75 | 10.1 (11.7) | 0.185 | 171 | 5.7 (6.9) | 0.139 | 44 | 10.2 (6.7) | 0.009 |
| 3 | 98 | 10.2 (20.3) | | 19 | 4.1 (2.7) | | 64 | 14.5 (10.5) | |
| 4 | 62 | 10.2 (11.4) | *NA | NA | 16 | 16.4 (11.4) | |||
Results are compared with Finnish and Nigerian patients in different subgroups. P value gives the statistical significance of the relationship between apoptotic counts (AI) and characteristics of the patient groups (t test, X² test, ANOVA). *NA not available. AI apoptotic activity index: SD standard deviation.
Figure 4Disease-specific survival (DSS) for 130 Libyan patients with BC divided according to AI cut point of four. The difference between the curves is highly significant (logrank P = 0.013).
Figure 5Disease-specific survival (DSS) for 130 Libyan patients with BC divided according to AI cut point of 18. The difference between the curves is highly significant (logrank P = 0.001).