Literature DB >> 22682363

Volatile organic compounds at swine facilities: a critical review.

Ji-Qin Ni1, Wayne P Robarge, Changhe Xiao, Albert J Heber.   

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are regulated aerial pollutants that have environmental and health concerns. Swine operations produce and emit a complex mixture of VOCs with a wide range of molecular weights and a variety of physicochemical properties. Significant progress has been made in this area since the first experiment on VOCs at a swine facility in the early 1960s. A total of 47 research institutions in 15 North American, European, and Asian countries contributed to an increasing number of scientific publications. Nearly half of the research papers were published by U.S. institutions. Investigated major VOC sources included air inside swine barns, in headspaces of manure storages and composts, in open atmosphere above swine wastewater, and surrounding swine farms. They also included liquid swine manure and wastewater, and dusts inside and outside swine barns. Most of the sample analyses have been focusing on identification of VOC compounds and their relationship with odors. More than 500 VOCs have been identified. About 60% and 10% of the studies contributed to the quantification of VOC concentrations and emissions, respectively. The largest numbers of VOC compounds with reported concentrations in a single experimental study were 82 in air, 36 in manure, and 34 in dust samples. The relatively abundant VOC compounds that were quantified in at least two independent studies included acetic acid, butanoic acid (butyric acid), dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl sulfide, iso-valeric, p-cresol, propionic acid, skatole, trimethyl amine, and valeric acid in air. They included acetic acid, p-cresol, iso-butyric acid, butyric acid, indole, phenol, propionic acid, iso-valeric acid, and skatole in manure. In dust samples, they were acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, p-cresol, hexanal, and decanal. Swine facility VOCs were preferentially bound to smaller-size dusts. Identification and quantification of VOCs were restricted by using instruments based on gas Chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) with different detectors most of which require time-consuming procedures to obtain results. Various methodologies and technologies in sampling, sample preparation, and sample analysis have been used. Only four publications reported using GC based analyzers and PTR-MS (proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry) that allowed continuous VOC measurement. Because of this, the majority of experimental studies were only performed on limited numbers of air, manure, or dust samples. Many aerial VOCs had concentrations that were too low to be identified by the GC peaks. Although VOCs emitted from swine facilities have environmental concerns, only a few studies investigated VOC emission rates, which ranged from 3.0 to 176.5mgd(-1)kg(-1) pig at swine finishing barns and from 2.3 to 45.2gd(-1)m(-2) at manure storages. Similar to the other pollutants, spatial and temporal variations of aerial VOC concentrations and emissions existed and were significantly affected by manure management systems, barn structural designs, and ventilation rates. Scientific research in this area has been mainly driven by odor nuisance, instead of environment or health concerns. Compared with other aerial pollutants in animal agriculture, the current scientific knowledge about VOCs at swine facilities is still very limited and far from sufficient to develop reliable emission factors.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22682363     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  11 in total

1.  Pragmatic evaluation of odour emissions from a rendering plant in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Magnun M Vieira; Waldir N Schirmer; Henrique de Melo Lisboa; Paulo Belli Filho; Jean-Michel Guillot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Evidence for early intracellular accumulation of volatile compounds during spadix development in Arum italicum L. and preliminary data on some tropical Aroids.

Authors:  Aurélia Leguet; Marc Gibernau; Laetitia Shintu; Stefano Caldarelli; Sandrine Moja; Sylvie Baudino; Jean-Claude Caissard
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-06-13

3.  Attitude toward livestock farming does not influence the earlier observed association between proximity to goat farms and self-reported pneumonia.

Authors:  Floor Borlée; C Joris Yzermans; Floor S M Oostwegel; François Schellevis; Dick Heederik; Lidwien A M Smit
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-12

4.  Measures of odor and lateralization thresholds of acrolein, crotonaldehyde, and hexanal using a novel vapor delivery technique.

Authors:  Lena Ernstgård; Aishwarya M Dwivedi; Johan N Lundström; Gunnar Johanson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Indoor exposure to particulate matter and volatile organic compounds in dwellings and workplaces and respiratory health in French farmers.

Authors:  Cara Nichole Maesano; Denis Caillaud; Hassani Youssouf; Soutrik Banerjee; Julie Prud'Homme; Christelle Audi; Kigninlman Horo; Yacouba Toloba; Ollivier Ramousse; Isabella Annesi-Maesano
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2019-10-02

6.  Production of Plant-Associated Volatiles by Select Model and Industrially Important Streptomyces spp.

Authors:  Zhenlong Cheng; Sean McCann; Nicoletta Faraone; Jody-Ann Clarke; E Abbie Hudson; Kevin Cloonan; N Kirk Hillier; Kapil Tahlan
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-11-11

Review 7.  P-Type Metal Oxide Semiconductor Thin Films: Synthesis and Chemical Sensor Applications.

Authors:  Abderrahim Moumen; Gayan C W Kumarage; Elisabetta Comini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Nrf2 Activation Protects Against Organic Dust and Hydrogen Sulfide Exposure Induced Epithelial Barrier Loss and K. pneumoniae Invasion.

Authors:  Denusha Shrestha; Nyzil Massey; Sanjana Mahadev Bhat; Tomislav Jelesijević; Orhan Sahin; Qijing Zhang; Kristina L Bailey; Jill A Poole; Chandrashekhar Charavaryamath
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.073

9.  Different creep compound feed formulations for new born piglets: influence on growth performance and health parameters.

Authors:  Sarunas Badaras; Modestas Ruzauskas; Romas Gruzauskas; Egle Zokaityte; Vytaute Starkute; Dovile Klupsaite; Ernestas Mockus; Jolita Klementaviciute; Laurynas Vadopalas; Gintare Zokaityte; Agila Dauksiene; Vadims Bartkevics; Elena Bartkiene
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-29

10.  Identification of Faecal Maternal Semiochemicals in Swine (Sus scrofa) and their Effects on Weaned Piglets.

Authors:  Edgar O Aviles-Rosa; Kaz Surowiec; John McGlone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.