Literature DB >> 22678812

Medicines and driving: evaluation of training and software support for patient counselling by pharmacists.

Sara-Ann Legrand1, Sofie Boets, Uta Meesmann, Alain G Verstraete.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The consumption of some psychotropic medicines has a negative effect on the fitness to drive. Pharmacists are expected to give useful advice to patients on their participation in traffic. However, almost no information is available on this topic.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of training and implementation of new dispensing guidelines with regard to driving-impairing medicines, in two types of dispensing support tools. User acceptance was measured as well as the effect on pharmacists' attitudes & awareness, self-reported behaviour and knowledge.
SETTING: Pharmacists from East Flanders in Belgium.
METHODS: Two intervention groups and a control group participated. The intervention groups followed a training and were provided with a dispensing support tool containing information on the effect of medicines on driving ability, which was either stand-alone (USB stick) or integrated into the daily used software (ViaNova). The three groups filled out a questionnaire prior to and after the intervention period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Answers to a pre/post-questionnaire on attitudes and awareness, self-reported behaviour, knowledge and user acceptance.
RESULTS: Many pharmacists were already strongly interested in the topic at the beginning of the study. Positive changes in attitude, self-reported behaviour and knowledge were measured mostly in the group of pharmacists for which the information was integrated in their daily used software. These pharmacists asked significantly more about the patients' driving experience, informed them more about driving-related risk and gave more detailed information on impairing effects of medicines. The knowledge of the participating pharmacists on the topic 'medicines and driving' remained generally low. The participants acknowledge the importance of being aware of the topic medicines and driving but they report a lack of information or education. They strongly prefer a tool that integrates the information in their daily used software.
CONCLUSION: Dispensing support tools with information on the potential impairing effect of a medicine on the fitness to drive increases awareness, reported risk communication behaviour as well as knowledge of pharmacists on this topic. Computerised dispensing support tools are most effective when the information is integrated into the daily used dispensing software.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678812     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-012-9658-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  23 in total

1.  Implementation of evidence and guidelines in clinical practice: a new field of research?

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  G Jamtvedt; J M Young; D T Kristoffersen; M A Thomson O'Brien; A D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Neill K J Adhikari; Heather McDonald; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; P J Devereaux; Joseph Beyene; Justina Sam; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: provision does not guarantee uptake.

Authors:  Annette Moxey; Jane Robertson; David Newby; Isla Hains; Margaret Williamson; Sallie-Anne Pearson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Effect of outpatient pharmacists' non-dispensing roles on patient outcomes and prescribing patterns.

Authors:  Nancy Nkansah; Olga Mostovetsky; Christine Yu; Tami Chheng; Johnny Beney; Christine M Bond; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-07-07

Review 7.  A European approach to categorizing medicines for fitness to drive: outcomes of the DRUID project.

Authors:  Silvia Ravera; Susana P Monteiro; Johan Jacob de Gier; Trudy van der Linden; Trinidad Gómez-Talegón; F Javier Alvarez
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Improving doctors' prescribing behaviour through reflection on guidelines and prescription feedback: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  P Lagerløv; M Loeb; M Andrew; P Hjortdahl
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

9.  An electronic prompt in dispensing software to promote clinical interventions by community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James F Reeve; Peter C Tenni; Gregory M Peterson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research.

Authors:  M E Johnston; K B Langton; R B Haynes; A Mathieu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  8 in total

1.  Receipt of Warnings Regarding Potentially Impairing Prescription Medications and Associated Risk Perceptions in a National Sample of U.S. Drivers.

Authors:  Robin A Pollini; Geetha Waehrer; Tara Kelley-Baker
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  A study comparing the effectiveness of three warning labels on the package of driving-impairing medicines.

Authors:  Bas Emich; Liset van Dijk; Susana P Monteiro; Johan J de Gier
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-09-10

Review 3.  Effectiveness of implementation strategies for clinical guidelines to community pharmacy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kim Watkins; Helen Wood; Carl R Schneider; Rhonda Clifford
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Use of driving-impairing medicines by a Spanish population: a population-based registry study.

Authors:  Eduardo Gutierrez-Abejón; Francisco Herrera-Gómez; Paloma Criado-Espegel; F Javier Alvarez
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Community pharmacists' attitudes towards patient leaflets: Exploring perceptions underlying an electronic local production of tailored written information.

Authors:  Catarina Vitor; Afonso Cavaco
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2018-06-25

6.  Population-Based Registry Analysis of Antidiabetics Dispensations: Trend Use in Spain between 2015 and 2018 with Reference to Driving.

Authors:  Eduardo Gutiérrez-Abejón; Paloma Criado-Espegel; Francisco Herrera-Gómez; F Javier Álvarez
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-25

7.  People with insomnia: experiences with sedative hypnotics and risk perception.

Authors:  Janet M Y Cheung; Delwyn J Bartlett; Carol L Armour; Jason G Ellis; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Benzodiazepines in the oral fluid of Spanish drivers.

Authors:  Francisco Herrera-Gómez; Mercedes García-Mingo; F Javier Álvarez
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2020-02-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.