Literature DB >> 22678177

Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic and single-port hysterectomy: perioperative outcomes.

Francesco Fanfani1, Anna Fagotti, Cristiano Rossitto, Maria Lucia Gagliardi, Alfredo Ercoli, Valerio Gallotta, Salvatore Gueli Alletti, Giorgia Monterossi, Luigi Carlo Turco, Giovanni Scambia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare perioperative outcomes and postoperative pain of standard laparoscopic (S-LPS), minilaparoscopic (M-LPS), and laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) hysterectomy.
METHODS: A single-institutional, matched, retrospective, cohort study was performed. Between May 2010 and March 2011, 85 consecutive women were submitted to a total laparoscopic hysterectomy by S-LPS, M-LPS, and single-port LESS. Perioperative outcomes of these three techniques were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS: Demographics and baseline characteristics of each group were absolutely comparable. The median operative time was longer [105 (range, 75-125) min] in the LESS group compared with the M-LPS group [90 (range, 60-120) min; p < 0.011] and S-LPS [80 (range, 50-110) min; p < 0.001]. No statistically significant differences have been reported for estimated blood loss or intra- and early postoperative complications. Postoperative pain control was better for LESS and M-LPS than S-LPS.
CONCLUSIONS: M-LPS and LESS hysterectomy can be performed safely, and both seem to be associated with a halving of early postoperative pain with a lower request of analgesics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678177     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2377-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Single-Port Laparoscopy, NOTES, and Endoluminal Surgery.

Authors:  Pedro F Escobar; Jihad H Kaouk; Daniel Geisler; Matthew Kroh; Amanda Nickles Fader; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2010-06-24

2.  Learning curve and surgical outcome for single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Sang-Wun Kim; San-Hui Lee; Maria Lee; Ga-Won Yim; Eun-Ji Nam; Young-Tae Kim
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal diseases: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Francesco Fanfani; Francesco Marocco; Cristiano Rossitto; Valerio Gallotta; Elisabetta Marana; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsten B Kluivers; Neil P Johnson; Patrick Chien; Mark E Vierhout; Marliesy Bongers; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Tae-Joong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Hyun Hwa Cha; Chul-Jung Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Je-Ho Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Total laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) hysterectomy in low-risk early endometrial cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Francesco Fanfani; Cristiano Rossitto; Maria Lucia Gagliardi; Valerio Gallotta; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Giovanni Scambia; Anna Fagotti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Carolina Bottoni; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Giovanni Scambia; Elisabetta Marana; Francesco Fanfani
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Fabio Ghezzi; Antonella Cromi; Gabriele Siesto; Stefano Uccella; Luigi Boni; Maurizio Serati; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Fabio Ghezzi; Antonella Cromi; Giacomo Colombo; Stefano Uccella; Valentino Bergamini; Maurizio Serati; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.

Authors:  Amanda Nickles Fader; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  16 in total

1.  The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience.

Authors:  Francesco Fanfani; Giorgia Monterossi; Anna Fagotti; Cristiano Rossitto; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Barbara Costantini; Valerio Gallotta; Luigi Selvaggi; Stefano Restaino; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Senhance™ surgical robotic system ("Senhance") for total hysterectomy in obese patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Salvatore Gueli Alletti; C Rossitto; S Cianci; E Perrone; S Pizzacalla; G Monterossi; G Vizzielli; S Gidaro; G Scambia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-06-17

3.  Reduced port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using a needle scope for lung and mediastinal lesions.

Authors:  Kichizo Kaga; Yasuhiro Hida; Reiko Nakada-Kubota; Kazuto Ohtaka; Jun Muto; Keidai Ishikawa; Tatsuya Kato; Yoshiro Matsui
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-03

4.  Peri-incisional and intraperitoneal ropivacaine administration: a new effective tool in pain control after laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Carlo Saccardi; Salvatore Gizzo; Amerigo Vitagliano; Marco Noventa; Massimo Micaglio; Matteo Parotto; Mauro Fiorese; Pietro Litta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Total microlaparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Fanfani; Valerio Gallotta; Anna Fagotti; Cristiano Rossitto; Elisa Piovano; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 6.  Ultra-minimally invasive surgery in gynecological patients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Marco La Verde; Gaetano Riemma; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-04-02

7.  Single-access laparoscopic approach in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: A single-institution experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Giacomo Corrado; Giuseppe Cutillo; Giulia Pomati; Emanuela Mancini; Ermelinda Baiocco; Lodovico Patrizi; Maria Saltari; Francesco Barletta; Fabiola Patani; Enrico Vizza
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Mini-Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Servet Gencdal; Huseyin Aydogmus; Serpil Aydogmus; Zafer Kolsuz; Sefa Kelekci
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 9.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelien M Sandberg; Claire F la Chapelle; Marjolein M van den Tweel; Jan W Schoones; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Retroperitoneal Approach in Single-Port Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Tae-Hyun Kim; Chul Jung Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.