Literature DB >> 16337574

Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial.

Fabio Ghezzi1, Antonella Cromi, Giacomo Colombo, Stefano Uccella, Valentino Bergamini, Maurizio Serati, Pierfrancesco Bolis.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effect on postoperative pain of laparoscopy for the management of adnexal masses by downsizing ancillary trocars from 5- to 3-mm.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
SETTING: Gynecologic department of a university hospital PATIENTS: A total of 102 women with an adnexal mass scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic procedures were randomized to undergo laparoscopy using either conventional 5-mm ancillary trocars (n=52) or 3-mm instruments (n=50). Preoperative suspicion of malignancy, deep infiltrating endometriosis, and indications for hysterectomy or myomectomy were considered as exclusion criteria.
INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic procedures for the treatment of benign adnexal masses.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Both groups were similar in patient age, body mass index, history of abdominal surgery, and type of procedures. Intraoperative complications occurred in no patient (0%) in the 3-mm group and in two patients (3.8%) in the 5-mm group (p=.49). Conversion from 3- to 5-mm instrumentation was necessary in one procedure. No difference was found in the operative time between the 3-mm and the 5-mm groups (54 min [range 15-175 min] vs 50 min [range 20-150 min], p=.89). The severity of incisional pain was evaluated with a 100-mm visual analog scale at 1, 3, and 24 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was significantly lower in the 3-mm than in the 5-mm group 1 hour after laparoscopy (20 [range 0-60] vs 32.5 [range 0-80], p=.04). The proportion of women requiring analgesia before discharge, the timing of analgesic requirement, and the total amount of medication in the first 24 hours after surgery were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Three-millimeter ancillary trocars can safely replace traditional-size equipment for the management of adnexal masses without a negative impact on the surgeon's ability to perform gynecologic laparoscopy and are associated with less immediate postoperative pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16337574     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  15 in total

1.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery is applicable to most gynecologic surgery: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Maria Lee; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Ga Won Yim; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Tae-Joong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Hyun Hwa Cha; Chul-Jung Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Je-Ho Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-port gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Tiffany Jackson; Jon Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

4.  Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic and single-port hysterectomy: perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Fanfani; Anna Fagotti; Cristiano Rossitto; Maria Lucia Gagliardi; Alfredo Ercoli; Valerio Gallotta; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Giorgia Monterossi; Luigi Carlo Turco; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Tissue injuries after single-port and multiport laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries: A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Kyeong A So; Jae Kwan Lee; Jae Yun Song; Jae Won Kim; Nak Woo Lee; Kyung-Do Ki; Jong-Min Lee; Yong Jung Song; Yong Jin Na; Chun Hoe Ku; Jin Woo Shin; Chul Jung Kim; Un Suk Jung
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Needlescopic hysterectomy: incorporation of 3-mm instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fabio Ghezzi; Antonella Cromi; Gabriele Siesto; Luigi Boni; Stefano Uccella; Valentino Bergamini; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Feasibility and efficacy of modern minilaparoscopy with 2.9 mm laparoscope for diagnostic and level II gynaecological procedure.

Authors:  Rakhi Rai; Kallol Kumar Roy; Vinod Nair; Garima Kachhawa; Rinchen Zangmo; Deepali Garg; Perumal Vanamail
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2021-04-27

8.  Laparoscopic entry techniques.

Authors:  Gaity Ahmad; Jade Baker; John Finnerty; Kevin Phillips; Andrew Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

9.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: LESS is actually how much less?

Authors:  Priya Bhave Chittawar; Navneet Magon; Shilpa Bhandari
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2013-01

10.  Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Questionnaire and Surgical Outcome in Single-Port Surgery for Benign Adnexal Disease: Observational Comparison with Traditional Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Alessandro Buda; Marco Cuzzocrea; Luca Montanelli; Paolo Passoni; Lorena Bargossi; Romina Baldo; Luca Locatelli; Rodolfo Milani
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2013-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.