Literature DB >> 22678110

Single umbilical artery: Does side matter?

Mark Santillan1, Donna Santillan, Diedre Fleener, Barbara Stegmann, Gideon Zamba, Stephen Hunter, Jerome Yankowitz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine if laterality of an absent umbilical artery (AUA) is associated with specific sonographic findings, chromosomal defects or postpartum birth defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, ultrasound reports and medical records of patients who received an obstetric ultrasound at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics with an identified laterality of the AUA from 1989 to 2007 (n = 405) were reviewed. Rates of sonographic abnormalities between fetuses with a right versus left AUA were compared using Fisher's exact test. Adjustments for confounding were made using logistic regression modeling. The significance level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: Right AUAs on ultrasound demonstrate higher unadjusted rates of ultrasound abnormalities with a higher percentage of fetuses with >1 additional abnormality (51.1 vs. 37.0%; p = 0.0043). The left AUA group had a significantly higher percentage of isolated AUA (63.0 vs. 48.8%; p = 0.004). In a multivariate analysis, a sonographic right AUA was significantly associated with gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) abnormalities. No other ultrasonographic and umbilical artery Doppler abnormalities, chromosomal defects or postpartum birth defects were significantly associated with a specific laterality of the AUA. DISCUSSION: Our study identified a significant association between a right AUA and concomitant fetal GI and GU abnormalities. Contrary to previous reports, we conclude that laterality of the AUA may prove to be an easily identified early marker of fetal abnormalities.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678110      PMCID: PMC7347210          DOI: 10.1159/000338133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1015-3837            Impact factor:   2.587


  16 in total

1.  Single umbilical artery and its siding in the second trimester of pregnancy: relation to chromosomal defects.

Authors:  Marek Lubusky; Ishraq Dhaifalah; Martin Prochazka; Jiri Hyjanek; Ivana Mickova; Katherine Vomackova; Jiri Santavy
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Perinatal Management and Outcome of Fetuses with Single Umbilical Artery Diagnosed Prenatally.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Investig       Date:  1998-12

3.  Single umbilical artery: correlation of the prognosis and side of the missing artery.

Authors:  Y Fukada; T Yasumizu; K Hoshi
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Single umbilical artery: accurate diagnosis?

Authors:  T B Jones; Y Sorokin; R Bhatia; I E Zador; S F Bottoms
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The clinical significance of a single umbilical artery as an isolated finding on prenatal ultrasound.

Authors:  B V Parilla; R K Tamura; S N MacGregor; L J Geibel; R E Sabbagha
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Single umbilical artery: prenatal findings.

Authors:  U J Herrmann; D Sidiropoulos
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Single umbilical artery--right or left? does it matter?

Authors:  S Blazer; P Sujov; Z Escholi; B H Itai; M Bronshtein
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Antenatal detection of a single umbilical artery: does it matter?

Authors:  A S Gornall; J J Kurinczuk; J C Konje
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Single umbilical artery: does it matter which artery is missing?

Authors:  A Z Abuhamad; W Shaffer; G Mari; J A Copel; J C Hobbins; A T Evans
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The value of single umbilical artery in the prediction of fetal aneuploidy: findings in 12,672 pregnant women.

Authors:  Roberta Granese; Claudio Coco; Philippe Jeanty
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.