Literature DB >> 22677490

The in vivo dynamic interplay of MDC1 and 53BP1 at DNA damage-induced nuclear foci.

Myth T S Mok1, Beric R Henderson.   

Abstract

MDC1 (NFBD1) and 53BP1 are critical mediators of the mammalian DNA damage response (DDR) at nuclear foci. Here we show by quantitative imaging assays that MDC1 and 53BP1 are similar in total copy number (~1200 copies per focus), but differ substantially in dynamics at both replication-associated nuclear bodies in normal cells and DNA repair foci in ionizing radiation (IR)-damaged cells. The majority of MDC1 (~80%) is extremely mobile and under continuous exchange, with only a small fraction (~20%) remaining immobile at foci irrespective of IR treatment. By contrast, 53BP1 has a smaller mobile fraction (~35%) and a larger immobile fraction (~65%) at nuclear bodies, and becomes more dynamic (~20% increase in mobile pool) upon IR-induced DNA damage. More specifically, the dynamics of 53BP1 is dependent on a minimal foci-targeting region (1231-1709), and differentially regulated by its N-terminus (1-1231) and C-terminal tBRCT domain (1709-1972). Furthermore, MDC1 knockdown, or disruption of 53BP1-MDC1 interaction, reduced the number of 53BP1 molecules at foci by ~60%, but only modestly affected 53BP1 retention. This novel in vivo evidence reveals distinct dynamics of MDC1 and 53BP1 at different types of nuclear structures, and shows that MDC1 directly recruits and retains a subset of 53BP1 for DNA repair.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22677490     DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 1357-2725            Impact factor:   5.085


  5 in total

1.  Mutations in the TP53 gene affected recruitment of 53BP1 protein to DNA lesions, but level of 53BP1 was stable after γ-irradiation that depleted MDC1 protein in specific TP53 mutants.

Authors:  Jana Suchánková; Soňa Legartová; Eva Ručková; Bořivoj Vojtěšek; Stanislav Kozubek; Eva Bártová
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 2.  Reading chromatin signatures after DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Marcus D Wilson; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Realistic dosimetry for studies on biological responses to X-rays and γ-rays.

Authors:  Mehrdad Shahmohammadi Beni; Dragana Krstic; Dragoslav Nikezic; Kwan Ngok Yu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Msl2 is a novel component of the vertebrate DNA damage response.

Authors:  Zheng Lai; Simona Moravcová; Yvan Canitrot; Lukasz P Andrzejewski; Dervla M Walshe; Stephen Rea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Biphasic and triphasic dose responses in zebrafish embryos to low-dose 150 kV X-rays with different levels of hardness.

Authors:  Eva Yi Kong; Shuk Han Cheng; Kwan Ngok Yu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 2.724

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.