Literature DB >> 22677258

Safety, tolerability, and antibody response of active Aβ immunotherapy with CAD106 in patients with Alzheimer's disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human study.

Bengt Winblad1, Niels Andreasen, Lennart Minthon, Annette Floesser, Georges Imbert, Thomas Dumortier, R Paul Maguire, Kaj Blennow, Joens Lundmark, Matthias Staufenbiel, Jean-Marc Orgogozo, Ana Graf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy targeting the amyloid β (Aβ) peptide is a potential strategy to slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease. We aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of CAD106, a novel active Aβ immunotherapy for patients with Alzheimer's disease, designed to induce N-terminal Aβ-specific antibodies without an Aβ-specific T-cell response.
METHODS: We did a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week study in two centres in Sweden. Participants, aged 50-80 years, with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease were entered into one of two cohorts according to time of study entry and then randomly allocated (by use of a computer-generated randomisation sequence) to receive either CAD106 or placebo (4:1; cohort one received CAD106 50 μg or placebo, cohort two received CAD106 150 μg or placebo). Each patient received three subcutaneous injections. All patients, caregivers, and investigators were masked to treatment allocation throughout the study. Primary objectives were to assess the safety and tolerability of CAD106 and to identify the Aβ-specific antibody response. Safety assessment was done by recording of all adverse events, assessment of MRI scans, physical and neurological examinations, vital signs, electrocardiography, electroencephalography, and laboratory analysis of blood and CSF. Patients with Aβ-IgG serum titres higher than 16 units at least once during the study were classified as responders. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411580.
FINDINGS: Between August, 2005, and March, 2007, we randomly allocated 31 patients into cohort one (24 patients to CAD106 treatment and seven to placebo) and 27 patients into cohort two (22 patients to CAD106 treatment and five to placebo). 56 of 58 patients reported adverse events. In cohort one, nasopharyngitis was the most commonly reported adverse event (10 of 24 CAD106-treated patients). In cohort two, injection site erythema was the most commonly reported adverse event (14 of 22 CAD106-treated patients). Overall, nine patients reported serious adverse events--none was thought to be related to the study drug. We recorded no clinical or subclinical cases of meningoencephalitis. 16 of 24 (67%) CAD106-treated patients in cohort one and 18 of 22 (82%) in cohort two developed Aβ antibody response meeting pre-specified responder threshold. One of 12 placebo-treated patients (8%) had Aβ-IgG concentrations that qualified them as a responder.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that CAD106 has a favourable safety profile and acceptable antibody response in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Larger trials with additional dose investigations are needed to confirm the safety and establish the efficacy of CAD106. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22677258     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70140-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  108 in total

1.  Alzheimer disease: Amyloid-β immunotherapy CAD106 passes first safety test in patients with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Katie Kingwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Virus-based nanoparticles as platform technologies for modern vaccines.

Authors:  Karin L Lee; Richard M Twyman; Steven Fiering; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-01-19

Review 3.  Amyloid beta: structure, biology and structure-based therapeutic development.

Authors:  Guo-Fang Chen; Ting-Hai Xu; Yan Yan; Yu-Ren Zhou; Yi Jiang; Karsten Melcher; H Eric Xu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  [Clinically validated molecular biomarkers of neurodegenerative dementia].

Authors:  J Wiltfang
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Immunotherapy for neurodegenerative diseases: focus on α-synucleinopathies.

Authors:  Elvira Valera; Eliezer Masliah
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 6.  Immunogenicity of DNA- and recombinant protein-based Alzheimer disease epitope vaccines.

Authors:  Hayk Davtyan; Andrew Bacon; Irina Petrushina; Karen Zagorski; David H Cribbs; Anahit Ghochikyan; Michael G Agadjanyan
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Primary and Secondary Prevention Trials in Alzheimer Disease: Looking Back, Moving Forward.

Authors:  David Hsu; Gad A Marshall
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Alzheimer disease immunotherapeutics: then and now.

Authors:  Harashish Jindal; Bhumika Bhatt; Shashikantha Sk; Jagbir Singh Malik
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Alzheimer's disease: which type of amyloid-preventing drug agents to employ?

Authors:  Hyunbum Jang; Laura Connelly; Fernando Teran Arce; Srinivasan Ramachandran; Ratnesh Lal; Bruce L Kagan; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 10.  Developing therapeutic vaccines against Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Thomas Wisniewski; Eleanor Drummond
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.