Literature DB >> 22677157

Feasibility and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valves.

Dominique Himbert1, Florence Pontnau, David Messika-Zeitoun, Fleur Descoutures, Delphine Détaint, Caroline Cueff, Martina Sordi, Jean-Pierre Laissy, Soleiman Alkhoder, Eric Brochet, Bernard Iung, Jean-Pol Depoix, Patrick Nataf, Alec Vahanian.   

Abstract

Little is known about transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, which usually represents a contraindication. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and the results of TAVI in this patient subset. Of 316 high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI from January 2009 to January 2012, 15 (5%) had documented bicuspid aortic valves. They were treated using a transarterial approach, using the Medtronic CoreValve system. Patients were aged 80 ± 10 years, in New York Heart Association functional classes III and IV. The mean aortic valve area was 0.8 ± 0.3 cm(2), and the mean gradient was 60 ± 19 mm Hg. The mean calcium score, calculated using multislice computed tomography, was 4,553 ± 1,872 arbitrary units. The procedure was successful in all but 1 patient. Major adverse events, according to Valvular Academic Research Consortium definitions, were encountered in 1 patient (death). The mean postimplantation prosthetic gradient was 11 ± 4 mm Hg, and ≤1+ periprosthetic leaks were observed in all but 2 patients. The mean prosthetic ellipticity index was 0.7 ± 0.2 at the level of the native annulus and 0.8 ± 0.2 at the level of the prosthetic leaflets. After a mean follow-up period of 8 ± 7 months, 1 patient had died from aortic dissection; there were no additional adverse events. All but 2 hospital survivors were in New York Heart Association class I or II. In conclusion, the present series suggests that transarterial Medtronic CoreValve implantation is feasible in selected patients with bicuspid aortic valve and may lead to short-term hemodynamic and clinical improvement.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22677157     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  35 in total

1.  Update of transcatheter valve treatment.

Authors:  Xian-bao Liu; Jian-an Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Intervention and management of congenital left heart obstructive lesions.

Authors:  Amy Schimke; Arjun Majithia; Robert Baumgartner; Amy French; David Goldberg; Jeffrey Kuvin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  Imaging to select and guide transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  José Luis Zamorano; Alexandra Gonçalves; Roberto Lang
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid anatomy.

Authors:  Zhen-Gang Zhao; Hasan Jilaihawi; Yuan Feng; Mao Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Current topics on bicuspid aortic valve: clinical aspects and surgical management.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 1.520

6.  Transcatheter Valve Underexpansion Limits Leaflet Durability: Implications for Valve-in-Valve Procedures.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Wei Sun
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Aortic annulus sizing in stenotic bicommissural non-raphe-type bicuspid aortic valves: reconstructing a three-dimensional structure using only two hinge points.

Authors:  Antonio H Frangieh; Jonathan Michel; Oliver Deutsch; Michael Joner; Costanza Pellegrini; Tobias Rheude; Sabine Bleiziffer; Albert Markus Kasel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Xie; Xiaohan Shi; Xiaoshuang Xun; Li Rao
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.520

9.  Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a severe stenotic bicuspid aortic valve in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Xian-bao Liu; Ju-bo Jiang; Qi-jing Zhou; Zhao-xia Pu; Wei He; Ai-qiang Dong; Yan Feng; Jun Jiang; Yong Sun; Mei-xiang Xiang; Yu-xin He; You-qi Fan; Liang Dong; Jian-an Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 10.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current application and future directions.

Authors:  Amir-Ali Fassa; Dominique Himbert; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.