OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare lateral thermal damage (LTD) produced by CO(2)-laser, monopolar electrosurgery (MES), and radiosurgery (MRS) and its effects on the reepithelialization of oral mucosa incisional wounds. STUDY DESIGN: Five adult swine were submitted to standardized incisions at the tongue and gingiva by MES, MRS, CO(2)-laser and scalpel. Full-thickness specimens were harvested sequentially on days 1 and 3. All specimens were formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, cut, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin to quantify LTD extent. Sections of day 3 were stained for Ki-67 to assess epithelial proliferation at the incision margins. A multiple linear regression model and an analysis of variance were used to determine the correlation of each instrument with LTD extent and Ki-67 expression respectively. RESULTS: LTD was most extensive in the CO(2)-laser but did not differ between the MES and MRS groups. No statistically significant differences regarding reepithelialization were noted among the investigated instruments. CONCLUSIONS: CO(2)-laser produced more extensive LTD, without evident impact on reepithelialization.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare lateral thermal damage (LTD) produced by CO(2)-laser, monopolar electrosurgery (MES), and radiosurgery (MRS) and its effects on the reepithelialization of oral mucosa incisional wounds. STUDY DESIGN: Five adult swine were submitted to standardized incisions at the tongue and gingiva by MES, MRS, CO(2)-laser and scalpel. Full-thickness specimens were harvested sequentially on days 1 and 3. All specimens were formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, cut, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin to quantify LTD extent. Sections of day 3 were stained for Ki-67 to assess epithelial proliferation at the incision margins. A multiple linear regression model and an analysis of variance were used to determine the correlation of each instrument with LTD extent and Ki-67 expression respectively. RESULTS: LTD was most extensive in the CO(2)-laser but did not differ between the MES and MRS groups. No statistically significant differences regarding reepithelialization were noted among the investigated instruments. CONCLUSIONS:CO(2)-laser produced more extensive LTD, without evident impact on reepithelialization.