Literature DB >> 22676881

Shared care for chronic eye diseases: perspectives of ophthalmologists, optometrists and patients.

Patricia M O'Connor1, C Alex Harper, Cathy L Brunton, Sandra J Clews, Sharon A Haymes, Jill E Keeffe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the perspectives of optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients on a model of shared care for patients with chronic eye diseases. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative study of a model of shared care between optometrists and ophthalmologists for patients with stable age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma, trialled by the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne during 2007–2009. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients at completion of the project to obtain their perspectives on this model.
RESULTS: Seventeen optometrists submitted expressions of interest to participate, and 12 completed web-based training modules and clinical observerships and adhered to specified examination and reporting protocols. All five participating ophthalmologists and 11 of the optometrists were interviewed. Ninety-eight patients participated and 37 were interviewed. Optometrists not only met ophthalmologists’ expectations but exceeded them, appropriately detecting and referring patients with additional, previously undetected conditions. Patients reported savings in travel time and were satisfied with the quality of care they received. Optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients indicated a general acceptance of shared care arrangements, although there were some issues relating to interprofessional trust.
CONCLUSIONS: Shared care between local optometrists and hospital-based ophthalmologists can help to reduce patient waiting time for review and offers an opportunity for these two groups of eye care professionals to collaborate in providing localised care for the benefit of patients. However, trust and relationship building need to be further developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22676881     DOI: 10.5694/mja11.10856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  13 in total

1.  Why don't general dental practitioners test for diabetes in periodontitis patients? How infrastructure, role identity and self-efficacy can prevent effective shared care.

Authors:  Varkha Rattu; Dominic Hurst
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.727

2.  Health professionals' and service users' perspectives of shared care for monitoring wet age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study alongside the ECHoES trial.

Authors:  D Townsend; B C Reeves; J Taylor; U Chakravarthy; D O'Reilly; R E Hogg; N Mills
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evaluation of a hospital-based integrated model of eye care for diabetic retinopathy assessment: a multimethod study.

Authors:  Janet C Long; Brette Blakely; Zeyad Mahmoud; Angelica Ly; Barbara Zangerl; Michael Kalloniatis; Nagi Assaad; Michael Yapp; Robyn Clay-Williams; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Impact of optical coherence tomography on diagnostic decision-making by UK community optometrists: a clinical vignette study.

Authors:  Anish Jindal; Irene Ctori; Bruno Fidalgo; Priya Dabasia; Konstantinos Balaskas; John G Lawrenson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Shared Care for Patients with Diabetes at Risk of Retinopathy: A Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Ranjana Mathur; Dirk F de Korne; Tien Yin Wong; Donald Tan Tiang Hwee; Peggy P Chiang; Edmund Wong; Bibhas Chakraborty; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  Improving Patient Access and Reducing Costs for Glaucoma with Integrated Hospital and Community Care: A Case Study from Australia.

Authors:  Belinda K Ford; Blake Angell; Gerald Liew; Andrew J R White; Lisa J Keay
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  A qualitative study of stakeholder views regarding participation in locally commissioned enhanced optometric services.

Authors:  E Konstantakopoulou; R A Harper; D F Edgar; J G Lawrenson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The design and implementation of a study to investigate the effectiveness of community vs hospital eye service follow-up for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with quiescent disease.

Authors:  J Taylor; L J Scott; C A Rogers; A Muldrew; D O'Reilly; S Wordsworth; N Mills; R Hogg; M Violato; S P Harding; T Peto; D Townsend; U Chakravarthy; B C Reeves
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Future requirements for and supply of ophthalmologists for an aging population in Singapore.

Authors:  John P Ansah; Dirk De Korne; Steffen Bayer; Chong Pan; Thiyagarajan Jayabaskar; David B Matchar; Nicola Lew; Andrew Phua; Victoria Koh; Ecosse Lamoureux; Desmond Quek
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2015-11-17

10.  A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care.

Authors:  Isabelle Jalbert; Dian Rahardjo; Aryati Yashadhana; Gerald Liew; Bamini Gopinath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.