Literature DB >> 22676315

Nurse-perceived barriers to effective communication regarding prognosis and optimal end-of-life care for surgical ICU patients: a qualitative exploration.

Rebecca A Aslakson1, Rhonda Wyskiel, Imani Thornton, Christina Copley, Dauryne Shaffer, Marylou Zyra, Judith Nelson, Peter J Pronovost.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Integration of palliative care for intensive care unit (ICU) patients is important but often challenging, especially in surgical ICUs (SICUs), in part because many surgeons equate palliative care with terminal care and failure of restorative care. SICU nurses, who are key front-line clinicians, can provide insights into barriers for delivery of optimal palliative care in their setting.
METHODS: We developed a focus group guide to identify barriers to two key components of palliative care-optimal communication regarding prognosis and optimal end-of-life care-and used the tool to conduct focus groups of nurses providing bedside care in three SICUs at a tertiary care, academic, inner city hospital. Using content analysis technique, responses were organized into thematic domains that were validated by independent observers and a subset of participating nurses.
RESULTS: Four focus groups included a total of 32 SICU nurses. They identified 34 barriers to optimal communication regarding prognosis, which were summarized into four domains: logistics, clinician discomfort with discussing prognosis, inadequate skill and training, and fear of conflict. For optimal end-of-life care, the groups identified 24 barriers in four domains: logistics, inability to acknowledge an end-of-life situation, inadequate skill and training, and cultural differences relating to end-of-life care.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses providing bedside care in SICUs identify barriers in several domains that may impede optimal discussions of prognoses and end-of-life care for patients with surgical critical illness. Consideration of these perceived barriers and the underlying SICU culture is relevant for designing interventions to improve palliative care in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22676315      PMCID: PMC3396137          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  30 in total

1.  Who should manage the dying patient?: Rescue, shame, and the surgical ICU dilemma.

Authors:  Timothy G Buchman; Joan Cassell; Shawn E Ray; Murray L Wax
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Palliative care by the surgeon: how to do it.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Dunn; Robert A Milch; Anne C Mosenthal; K Francis Lee; Alexandra M Easson; Joan L Huffman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Improving family communications at the end of life: implications for length of stay in the intensive care unit and resource use.

Authors:  Tom Ahrens; Valerie Yancey; Marin Kollef
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 4.  Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Derek C Angus; Todd Dorman; Karen A Robinson; Tony T Dremsizov; Tammy L Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill.

Authors:  C M Lilly; D L De Meo; L A Sonna; K J Haley; A F Massaro; R F Wallace; S Cody
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Surgeons, intensivists, and the covenant of care: administrative models and values affecting care at the end of life--Updated.

Authors:  Joan Cassell; Timothy G Buchman; Stephen Streat; Ronald M Stewart
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Intensive communication: four-year follow-up from a clinical practice study.

Authors:  Craig M Lilly; L A Sonna; K J Haley; A F Massaro
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Lisa A Weissfeld; R Scott Watson; Tim Rickert; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Impact of a proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical ICU.

Authors:  Margaret L Campbell; Jorge A Guzman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Surgical intensive care unit clinician estimates of the adequacy of communication regarding patient prognosis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Aslakson; Rhonda Wyskiel; Dauryne Shaeffer; Marylou Zyra; Nita Ahuja; Judith E Nelson; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  15 in total

1.  Differences in end-of-life care in the ICU across patients cared for by medicine, surgery, neurology, and neurosurgery physicians.

Authors:  Erin K Kross; Ruth A Engelberg; Lois Downey; Joseph Cuschieri; Matthew R Hallman; W T Longstreth; David L Tirschwell; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  "I Just Felt Like I Was Stuck in the Middle": Physician Assistants' Experiences Communicating With Terminally Ill Patients and Their Families in the Acute Care Setting.

Authors:  Elizabeth Chuang; Richard Lamkin; Aluko A Hope; Gina Kim; Jean Burg; Michelle Ng Gong
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Racial variation in the use of life-sustaining treatments among patients who die after major elective surgery.

Authors:  Roland A Hernandez; Nathanael D Hevelone; Lenny Lopez; Samuel R G Finlayson; Eva Chittenden; Zara Cooper
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  A rapid scoping review of end-of-life conversations with frail older adults in Canada.

Authors:  Celina Carter; Francesco Leanza; Shan Mohammed; Ross E G Upshur; Pia Kontos
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.

Authors:  Rebecca E Ryan; Michael Connolly; Natalie K Bradford; Simon Henderson; Anthony Herbert; Lina Schonfeld; Jeanine Young; Josephine I Bothroyd; Amanda Henderson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-08

6.  Perceptions on the current content and pedagogical approaches used in end-of-life care education among undergraduate nursing students: a qualitative, descriptive study.

Authors:  Wenjing Cao; Chunyan Li; Qianqian Zhang; Huiru Tong
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.263

7.  Interpersonal Conflict between Clinicians in the Delivery of Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Wendy Tong; Komal P Murali; Laura D Fonseca; Craig D Blinderman; Rachel C Shelton; May Hua
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Communication Training: Needs Among Oncology Nurses Across the Cancer Continuum.

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg; Joy Goldsmith; Haley Buller; Sandra L Ragan; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.027

9.  Palliative and End-of-Life Care: Vital Aspects of Holistic Diabetes Care of Older People With Diabetes.

Authors:  Trisha Lynette Dunning
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2020-08

10.  Family and Nurse Prognostication in Chronic Critical Illness.

Authors:  Barbara J Daly; Sara L Douglas; Amy R Lipson
Journal:  Int J Nurs Res       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.