Literature DB >> 22675588

High quality draft genome sequence of Segniliparus rugosus CDC 945(T)= (ATCC BAA-974(T)).

Ashlee M Earl, Christopher A Desjardins, Michael G Fitzgerald, Harindra M Arachchi, Qiandong Zeng, Teena Mehta, Allison Griggs, Bruce W Birren, Nadege C Toney, Janice Carr, James Posey, W Ray Butler.   

Abstract

Segniliparus rugosus represents one of two species in the genus Segniliparus, the sole genus in the family Segniliparaceae. A unique and interesting feature of this family is the presence of extremely long carbon-chain length mycolic acids bound in the cell wall. S. rugosus is also a medically important species because it is an opportunistic pathogen associated with mammalian lung disease. This report represents the second species in the genus to have its genome sequenced. The 3,567,567 bp long genome with 3,516 protein-coding and 49 RNA genes is part of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Human Microbiome Project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human Microbiome Project; Segniliparaceae,genome sequencing

Year:  2011        PMID: 22675588      PMCID: PMC3368418          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2255041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain CDC 945T (= ATCC BAA-974T = CIP 10838T = DSM 45345 = CCUG 50838T = JCM 13579T) is the type strain of the species Segniliparus rugosus in the Segniliparaceae family [1]. The genus name was created to acknowledge the presence of novel long carbon-chain fatty acids (mycolic acids) detected using the Mycobacterium species identification method with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [2]. The name was formed from the Latin adjective ‘segnis’, meaning ‘slow’ and combined with the Greek adjective ‘liparos’ for ‘fatty’, to indicate the ‘one with slow fats’. The name relates to the late elution of the apolar, alpha-mycolic acids (fatty acids) during HPLC analysis [1]. The specific epithet for the taxon name is from the Latin adjective ‘rugosus’, referring to the formation of wrinkled, rough colony morphology [1]. The type strain of S. rugosus, CDC 945T, was isolated from a human sputum specimen collected in Alabama, USA [1]. S. rugosus has been isolated from multiple patients with cystic fibrosis in the U.S. and Australia and appears to be a respiratory opportunistic pathogen [3,4]. A recent isolation from a ~1 year old sea lion showing third-stage malnutrition with a 30% loss of body weight, moderate bradycardia and severe hypothermia, suggests a possible aquatic or marine niche for the species [5]. The only other validly named species of the genus is Segniliparus rotundus (CDC 1076T), which is the type strain of this species. S. rotundus. CDC 1076 shares 98.9% 16S rRNA sequence identity with S. rugosus CDC 945T, although the DNA-DNA hybridization is less than 28% [1]. The complete genome of S. rotundus was recently reported and has 3,157,527 bp with 3,081 protein-coding and 52 RNA genes [6]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for S. rugosus CDC 945T, together with the description of the high quality draft genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The cells of CDC 945T are irregular rods ranging in length and width from 0.55-0.90 µm by 1.9-4.5 µm (Table 1 and Figure 1). Colonies are wrinkled, rough and form in less than 7 days on 7H10 and 7H11 agar at an optimal temperature of 33oC [1]. CDC 945T is aerobic, non-motile, asporogenous, and stains bright red with acid alcohol stain [1]. It is mesophilic and demonstrates a temperature range for growth between 22 and 42 oC [1]. Colonies grown for < 4 weeks are non-pigmented, nonphotochromogenic and do not produce a diagnostic odor [1]. They do not produce aerial mycelium, spores or demonstrate true branching. Young colonies are creamy and smear easily when disturbed. Cell growth at ~4 weeks on Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium produces a diffusible pink color in the agar at the leading edges of mature growth. Aged colonies on LJ develop a light buff pigment and demonstrate ‘greening’ from uptake of malachite green [1]. CDC 945T is weakly positive for arylsulfatase at 7 days but is strongly positive in 14 days. No growth on MacConkey agar not containing crystal violet. CDC 945T grows in the presence of 5% sodium chloride at 7 days, in lysozyme at 21 days. Positive for iron uptake, nitrate reduction, tellurite reduction and tween opacity. Negative for tween hydrolysis [1].
Table1

Classification and general features of S. rugosus CDC 945T according to the MIGS recommendations [25].

MIGS ID   Property   Term   Evidence code
   Domain Bacteria   TAS [26]
   Phylum Actinobacteria   TAS [27]
   Class Actinobacteria   TAS [28]
   Subclass Actinobacteridae   TAS [28]
   Order Actinomycetales   TAS [28,29]
   Current classification   Suborder Corynebacterineae   TAS [28,29]
   Family Segniliparaceae   TAS [1,29]
   Genus Segniliparus   TAS [1]
   Species Segniliparus rugosus   TAS [1]
   Type strain CDC 945   TAS [1]
   Gram stain   not reported
   Cell shape   rods, irregular   TAS [1]
   Motility   nonmotile   TAS [1]
   Sporulation   non-sporulating   TAS [1]
   Temperature range   mesophile, 22-42 oC   TAS [1]
   Optimum temperature   33oC   TAS [1]
   Salinity   unknown
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement   aerobic   TAS [1]
   Carbon source   D-glucose, glycerol, maltose, mannitol, D-sorbitol and trehalose   TAS [1]
   Energy source   chemoorganotroph   TAS [1]
MIGS-6   Habitat   environmental water suggested   TAS [5]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship   likely free-living   NAS [5]
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity   opportunistic pathogen   TAS [1,3]
   Biosafety level   2   TAS [1,3,30]
   Isolation   sputum, human   TAS [1,3]
MIGS-4   Geographic location   Alabama, USA   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1   Latitude   not reported
MIGS-4.2   Longitude   not reported
MIGS-4.3   Depth   not reported
MIGS-4.4   Altitude   not reported
MIGS-5   Sample collection time   1998   TAS [1]

Evidence codes- TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [31].

Figure1

Scanning electron micrograph of S. rugosus CDC 945T. The scale bar is 667nm.

Evidence codes- TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [31]. Scanning electron micrograph of S. rugosus CDC 945T. The scale bar is 667nm. Results with the API CORYNE test kit shows CDC 945T is positive for β-glucosidase, and pyrazinamidase activities and negative for alkaline phosphatase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and pyrrolidonyl arylamidase activity at 33oC [1]. It is susceptible to imipenem 4ug/ml, moxifloxacin 0.5 μg/ml, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole < 4.8 ug/ml, intermediate to cefoxitan 64 ug/ml and resistant to amikacin >128 ug/ml, clarithromycin 32 ug/ml, ciprofloxacin 16 ug/ml, ethambutol >16 ug/ml and tobramycin >64 ug/ml. [1,3]. Strain CDC 945T uses D-glucose, glycerol, maltose, mannitol, D-sorbitol and trehalose as sole carbon sources with the production of acid. No growth on adonitol, L-arabinose, cellobiose, citrate, dulcitol, i-erythriol, galactose, i-myo-inositol, lactose, mannose, melibiose, raffinose, L-rhamnose, salicin or sodium citrate [1]. The strain hydrolyzes urea but not acetamide adenine, casein, aesculin, hypoxanthine, tyrosine or xanthine [1].

Chemotaxonomy

The cell wall of strain CDC 945T contains mycolic acids and meso-diaminopimelic acid [1]. The mycolic acid pattern developed with HPLC is a double cluster of peaks emerging at 7.24 min and the last peak group is unresolved and elutes slightly before the 110 carbon chain length, high molecular weight internal standard [1,2]. Thin layer chromatography confirms 2 groups of apolar, α- and α'-alpha-mycolic acids lacking oxygen function, other than the hydroxyl group [1]. The HPLC and TLC results indicate that this strain produces a unique homologous subclass of long, alpha-mycolic acids with additional 90 to 110 carbons [1]. The fatty acid profile by gas-liquid chromatography is C10:0 (8.65%), C12:0 (1.33%), C14:0 (8.49%), C16:0 (18.34%), C18:1ω9c (8.93%), C18:0 10-methyl (tuberculostearic acid, 21.62%), and C20 (28.51%) [1]. The phylogenetic association of Segniliparus species is shown in Figure 2 in a 16S rRNA based tree. The genus forms a distinct lineage relative to the other mycolic acid containing Actinobacteria. The positioning of Segniliparus in this phylogenetic analysis is consistent with its positioning in the “All-Species Living Tree Project” LTP release 106, August 2011, which is similarly based on 16S rRNA. [11].
Figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was generated using PHYML v2.2.4 [7] based on 16S rRNA sequences highlighting the position of S. rugosus CDC 945T relative to the other type strains of mycolic acid containing genera in the suborder Corynebacterineae. GenBank accession numbers are listed after the name. The tree was inferred from 1,468 bp positions aligned using Clustal W [8] in MEGA v4 [9]. Numbers at the branch nodes are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if equal to or greater than 70%. The scale bar indicates substitutions per site. The tree was rooted with Streptomyces coelicolor. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was generated using PHYML v2.2.4 [7] based on 16S rRNA sequences highlighting the position of S. rugosus CDC 945T relative to the other type strains of mycolic acid containing genera in the suborder Corynebacterineae. GenBank accession numbers are listed after the name. The tree was inferred from 1,468 bp positions aligned using Clustal W [8] in MEGA v4 [9]. Numbers at the branch nodes are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if equal to or greater than 70%. The scale bar indicates substitutions per site. The tree was rooted with Streptomyces coelicolor. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its association with respiratory lung disease and is part of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Human Microbiome Project (HMP) [12]. The HMP presents reference genomes in Genome Online Database (GOLD) [10], the Human Microbiome Project Data Analysis and Coordination Center Project Catalog [13] and the complete high quality draft genome sequence is deposited in GenBank [14]. The Broad Institute performed the sequencing and annotation of this high quality draft genome [15]. A summary of the project is given in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID    Property   Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality   High Quality Draft
MIGS-28    Libraries used   Two 454 pyrosequence libraries, one standard 0.6kb fragment library and one 2.5kb jump library
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms   454 Titanium
MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage   13×
MIGS-30    Assemblers   Newbler Assembler version 2.3 PostRelease-11/19/2009
MIGS-32    Gene calling method   Glimmer; Metagene; PFAM; BLAST to non-redundant protein database; manual curation
    Genbank ID   ACZI01000000
    Genbank Date of Release   November 10, 2010
    GOLD ID   Gi05259
    NCBI project ID   40685
MIGS-13    Source material identifier   ATCC BAA-974T
    Project relevance   Human Microbiome Project

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Strain CDC 945T was grown statically in Middlebrook 7H9 medium at 33oC until late log. DNA was isolated from whole cells after a chloroform/methanol wash with a disruption solution of guanidine thiocyamate, sarkosyl and mercaptoethanol as described in Mve-Obiang et al. [16]. The purity of DNA was assessed by The Broad Institute using the Quant-iT™ dsDNA Assay High Sensitivity Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of Segniliparus rugosus ATCC BAA-974 was sequenced using 454 pyrosequence fragment and jump libraries [17]. We assembled the 454 data, consisting of 135,510 fragment reads and 112,271 jump reads, using Newbler Assembler version 2.3 PostRelease-11/19/2009. The assembly is considered High-Quality Draft and consists of 262 contigs arranged in 30 scaffolds with a total size of 3,567,567 bases. The error rate of this draft genome sequence is less than 1 in 10,000 (accuracy of ~ Q40). Average sequence coverage is 13×. Assessment of coverage, GC content, contig BLAST and 16S contig classification were consistent with the species Segniliparus

Genome annotation

Protein-coding genes were predicted using four ORF-finding tools: GeneMark [18], Glimmer3 [19], Metagene [20], and findBlastOrfs (unpublished). This latter tool builds genes by extending whole-genome blast alignments, in-frame, to include start and stop codons. The final set of non-overlapping ORFs was selected from the output of these tools using an in-house gene-caller, which uses dynamic programming to score candidate gene models based on strength of similarity to entries in UniRef90, then selects non-overlapping genes that, combined, have the highest overall score. In cases where predictions overlapped non-coding RNA features (see below), the genes were manually inspected and removed when necessary. Finally, the gene set was reviewed using both the NCBI discrepancy report and the internal Broad annotation metrics. Ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) were identified with RNAmmer [21]. The tRNA features were identified using tRNAScan [22]. Other non-coding features were identified with RFAM [23]. The gene product names were assigned based on Hmmer equivalogs from TIGRfam and Pfam, and blast hits to KEGG and SwissProt protein sequence databases. This was done using the naming tool “Pidgin” [24].

Genome properties

This 3,567,567 bp draft genome has high G+C content (Table 3 and Figure 3) and is predicted to encode 3,571 genes, 98% of which are protein coding. Nearly 70% of predicted proteins have a functional prediction and COG functional categories have been assigned to 53% of predicted proteins (Table 4).
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute
    Value
    % of Total
Genome size (bp)    3,647,826    100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)    3,156,492    86.35%
DNA G+C content (bp)    2,484,899    68.12%
Number of replicons    unknown
Extrachromosomal elements    unknown
Total genes    3,571    100.0%
tRNA genes    46    1.28%
rRNA genes    3    0.08%
rRNA operons    1    0.03%
CRISPR repeats    0
Protein-coding genes    3,522    98.62%
Pseudo genes (partial genes)    6 (233)    0.17% (6.52%)
Genes with function prediction    2,486    69.62%
Genes in paralog clusters    194    5.43%
Genes assigned to COGS    1,897    53.12%
Genes assigned Pfam domains    2,451    68.64%
Genes with signal peptides    412    11.54%
Genes with transmembrane helices    590    16.52%
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    Value    %age     Description
J    121    3.4     Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    1    0.0     RNA processing and modification
K    89    2.5     Transcription
L    84    2.4     Replication, recombination and repair
B    0    0.0     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    18    0.5     Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0    0.0     Nuclear structure
V    22    0.6     Defense mechanisms
T    51    1.4     Signal transduction mechanisms
M    85    2.4     Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    3    0.1     Cell motility
Z    0    0.0     Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.0     Extracellular structures
U    11    0.3     Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O    77    2.2     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    140    4.0     Energy production and conversion
G    100    2.8     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    225    6.4     Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    74    2.1     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    102    2.9     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    120    3.4     Lipid transport and metabolism
P    110    3.1     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    92    2.6     Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    246    7.0     General function prediction only
S    126    3.6     Function unknown
-    1625    46.1     Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), GC content, GC skew.
  24 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Stéphane Guindon; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER.

Authors:  A L Delcher; D Harmon; S Kasif; O White; S L Salzberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Joel Dudley; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Mycolic acid analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography for identification of Mycobacterium species.

Authors:  W R Butler; L S Guthertz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Complete genome sequence of Segniliparus rotundus type strain (CDC 1076).

Authors:  Johannes Sikorski; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Monica Misra; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Feng Chen; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Marlen Jando; Susanne Schneider; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Olga Chertkov; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Cliff Han; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-03-30

9.  GenBank.

Authors:  Dennis A Benson; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; David J Lipman; James Ostell; Eric W Sayers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes.

Authors:  Sam Griffiths-Jones; Simon Moxon; Mhairi Marshall; Ajay Khanna; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Variable suites of non-effector genes are co-regulated in the type III secretion virulence regulon across the Pseudomonas syringae phylogeny.

Authors:  Tatiana S Mucyn; Scott Yourstone; Abigail L Lind; Surojit Biswas; Marc T Nishimura; David A Baltrus; Jason S Cumbie; Jeff H Chang; Corbin D Jones; Jeffery L Dangl; Sarah R Grant
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 2.  Role of Williamsia and Segniliparus in human infections with the approach taxonomy, cultivation, and identification methods.

Authors:  Mehdi Fatahi-Bafghi
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Differential immune responses to Segniliparus rotundus and Segniliparus rugosus infection and analysis of their comparative virulence profiles.

Authors:  Jong-Seok Kim; Woo Sik Kim; Keehoon Lee; Choul-Jae Won; Jin Man Kim; Seok-Yong Eum; Won-Jung Koh; Sung Jae Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Draft genome sequences of six enterohepatic helicobacter species isolated from humans and one from rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Zeli Shen; Alexander Sheh; Sarah K Young; Amr Abouelliel; Doyle V Ward; Ashlee M Earl; James G Fox
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-09-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.