BACKGROUND: Loss of the tumor suppressor PTEN is common in prostate cancer and may have prognostic significance. The authors examined PTEN and additional protein markers in primary tumors from patients with high-risk, localized prostate cancer who received adjuvant docetaxel in a prospective multicenter trial (TAX2501). METHODS: Fifty-six of 77 patients enrolled in TAX2501 had primary prostatectomy specimens available for immunohistochemical analysis of PTEN, MYC, ERG, tumor protein p53 (p53), antigen KI-67 (Ki67), and phosphorylated forms of Akt, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and S6 ribosomal protein. Protocol-defined progression included a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≥ 0.4 ng/mL, radiologic/clinical recurrence, or death. Univariate and multivariable proportional hazards regression analyses were used to investigate the influence of PTEN status (and other protein markers) on progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In this exploratory, post hoc analysis, PTEN protein loss (vs presence) was observed in 61% of patients and was associated with lower preoperative PSA levels, higher clinical stage, lower Ki67 expression, the presence of p53, and the presence of ERG. In univariate analysis, the factors associated with PFS included Gleason sum, seminal vesicle invasion, PTEN status, MYC expression, and Ki67 expression. In multivariable analysis, only 3 variables emerged as independent prognostic factors for PFS: PTEN status (P = .035), MYC expression (P = .001), and Ki67 expression (P < .001). A prognostic model was constructed that incorporated clinical covariates as well as information on PTEN, MYC, and Ki67. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that PTEN status, MYC expression, and Ki67 expression in primary tumor samples may predict PFS more accurately than clinical factors alone in men with high-risk prostate cancer who receive adjuvant docetaxel after prostatectomy. If validated, these hypothesis-generating findings may have prognostic and therapeutic implications and may aid clinical trial design.
BACKGROUND: Loss of the tumor suppressor PTEN is common in prostate cancer and may have prognostic significance. The authors examined PTEN and additional protein markers in primary tumors from patients with high-risk, localized prostate cancer who received adjuvant docetaxel in a prospective multicenter trial (TAX2501). METHODS: Fifty-six of 77 patients enrolled in TAX2501 had primary prostatectomy specimens available for immunohistochemical analysis of PTEN, MYC, ERG, tumor protein p53 (p53), antigen KI-67 (Ki67), and phosphorylated forms of Akt, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and S6 ribosomal protein. Protocol-defined progression included a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≥ 0.4 ng/mL, radiologic/clinical recurrence, or death. Univariate and multivariable proportional hazards regression analyses were used to investigate the influence of PTEN status (and other protein markers) on progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In this exploratory, post hoc analysis, PTEN protein loss (vs presence) was observed in 61% of patients and was associated with lower preoperative PSA levels, higher clinical stage, lower Ki67 expression, the presence of p53, and the presence of ERG. In univariate analysis, the factors associated with PFS included Gleason sum, seminal vesicle invasion, PTEN status, MYC expression, and Ki67 expression. In multivariable analysis, only 3 variables emerged as independent prognostic factors for PFS: PTEN status (P = .035), MYC expression (P = .001), and Ki67 expression (P < .001). A prognostic model was constructed that incorporated clinical covariates as well as information on PTEN, MYC, and Ki67. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that PTEN status, MYC expression, and Ki67 expression in primary tumor samples may predict PFS more accurately than clinical factors alone in men with high-risk prostate cancer who receive adjuvant docetaxel after prostatectomy. If validated, these hypothesis-generating findings may have prognostic and therapeutic implications and may aid clinical trial design.
Authors: Bruce Montgomery; Philip Lavori; Mark Garzotto; Kelvin Lee; Mary Brophy; Surai Thaneemit-Chen; William Kelly; Joseph Basler; Robert Ringer; Wei Yu; Alice Whittemore; Daniel W Lin Journal: Urology Date: 2008-04-14 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Luciana Schultz; Alcides Chaux; Roula Albadine; Jessica Hicks; Jenny J Kim; Angelo M De Marzo; Mohamad E Allaf; Michael A Carducci; Ronald Rodriguez; Hans-Joerg Hammers; Pedram Argani; Victor E Reuter; George J Netto Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Hao Geng; Brooks L Rademacher; Janet Pittsenbarger; Chung-Ying Huang; Christopher T Harvey; Marie C Lafortune; Anne Myrthue; Mark Garzotto; Peter S Nelson; Tomasz M Beer; David Z Qian Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David J Mulholland; Linh M Tran; Yunfeng Li; Houjian Cai; Ashkan Morim; Shunyou Wang; Seema Plaisier; Isla P Garraway; Jiaoti Huang; Thomas G Graeber; Hong Wu Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Tamara L Lotan; Bora Gurel; Siobhan Sutcliffe; David Esopi; Wennuan Liu; Jianfeng Xu; Jessica L Hicks; Ben H Park; Elizabeth Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; George J Netto; William B Isaacs; Angelo M De Marzo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Cheryl M Koh; Bora Gurel; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Martin J Aryee; Denise Schultz; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Motohide Uemura; Karen I Zeller; Uzoma Anele; Qizhi Zheng; Jessica L Hicks; William G Nelson; Chi V Dang; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Isabel F Pinhel; Fiona A Macneill; Margaret J Hills; Janine Salter; Simone Detre; Roger A'hern; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Peter Osin; Ian E Smith; Mitch Dowsett Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Carlos L Morais; Mehsati Herawi; Antoun Toubaji; Roula Albadine; Jessica Hicks; George J Netto; Angelo M De Marzo; Jonathan I Epstein; Tamara L Lotan Journal: Prostate Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Romain Mathieu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Christian Seitz; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Harun Fajkovic; Maxine Sun; Yair Lotan; Douglas S Scherr; Ashutosh Tewari; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Morgan Rouprêt; Ilaria Lucca; Vitaly Margulis; Michael Rink; Luis A Kluth; Malte Rieken; Alexander Bachman; Evanguelos Xylinas; Brian D Robinson; Karim Bensalah; Markus Margreiter Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-10-26 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Andreas Pettersson; Travis Gerke; Kathryn L Penney; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Nelma Pértega-Gomes; Giorgia Zadra; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci; Massimo Loda Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Hsueh-Li Tan; Akshay Sood; Hameed A Rahimi; Wenle Wang; Nilesh Gupta; Jessica Hicks; Stacy Mosier; Christopher D Gocke; Jonathan I Epstein; George J Netto; Wennuan Liu; William B Isaacs; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas U Ahearn; Andreas Pettersson; Ericka M Ebot; Travis Gerke; Rebecca E Graff; Carlos L Morais; Jessica L Hicks; Kathryn M Wilson; Jennifer R Rider; Howard D Sesso; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Richard Flavin; Stephen Finn; Edward L Giovannucci; Massimo Loda; Meir J Stampfer; Angelo M De Marzo; Lorelei A Mucci; Tamara L Lotan Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 13.506