Literature DB >> 22673797

Slow progress in changing the school food environment: nationally representative results from public and private elementary schools.

Lindsey Turner, Frank J Chaloupka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children spend much of their day in school, and authorities have called for improvements in the school food environment. However, it is not known whether changes have occurred since the federal wellness policy mandate took effect in 2006-2007.
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether the school food environment in public and private elementary schools changed over time and examined variations by school type and geographic division. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey data were gathered from respondents at nationally representative samples of elementary schools during the 2006-2007 and 2009-2010 school years (respectively, 578 and 680 public schools, and 259 and 313 private schools). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Topics assessed included competitive foods, school meals, and other food-related practices (eg, school gardens and nutrition education). A 16-item food environment summary score was computed, with possible scores ranging from 0 (least healthy) to 100 (healthiest). ANALYSES: Multivariate regression models were used to examine changes over time in the total school food environment score and component items, and variations by US census division.
RESULTS: Many practices improved, such as participation in school gardens or farm-to-school programs, and availability of whole grains and only lower-fat milks in lunches. Although the school food environment score increased significantly, the magnitude of change was small; as of 2009-2010 the average score was 53.5 for public schools (vs 50.1 in 2006-2007) and 42.2 for private schools (vs 37.2 in 2006-2007). Scores were higher in public schools than in private schools (P<0.001), but did not differ by race/ethnicity or school size. For public schools, scores were higher in the Pacific and West South Central divisions compared with the national average.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the school food environment have been minimal, with much room remaining for improvement. Additional policy changes may be needed to speed the pace of improvement.
Copyright © 2012 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22673797     DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  15 in total

1.  Where are kids getting their empty calories? Stores, schools, and fast-food restaurants each played an important role in empty calorie intake among US children during 2009-2010.

Authors:  Jennifer M Poti; Meghan M Slining; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 2.  Adoption and Design of Emerging Dietary Policies to Improve Cardiometabolic Health in the US.

Authors:  Yue Huang; Jennifer Pomeranz; Parke Wilde; Simon Capewell; Tom Gaziano; Martin O'Flaherty; Rogan Kersh; Laurie Whitsel; Dariush Mozaffarian; Renata Micha
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Socioeconomic Differences in the Association Between Competitive Food Laws and the School Food Environment.

Authors:  Daniel R Taber; Jamie F Chriqui; Lisa M Powell; Frank M Perna; Whitney R Robinson; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.118

4.  Solid fat and added sugar intake among U.S. children: The role of stores, schools, and fast food, 1994-2010.

Authors:  Jennifer M Poti; Meghan M Slining; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act Increases Phytochemicals in Menus and Curriculum Furthers Identification of Phytochemical-Rich Foods.

Authors:  D Brewer; S Hershberger; L Gaetke
Journal:  J Nutrit Health Food Sci       Date:  2016-03-09

6.  Energy intakes of US children and adults by food purchase location and by specific food source.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; Colin D Rehm
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative: School nutrition environment and body mass index in primary schools.

Authors:  Trudy M A Wijnhoven; Joop M A van Raaij; Agneta Sjöberg; Nazih Eldin; Agneta Yngve; Marie Kunešová; Gregor Starc; Ana I Rito; Vesselka Duleva; Maria Hassapidou; Eva Martos; Iveta Pudule; Ausra Petrauskiene; Victoria Farrugia Sant'Angelo; Ragnhild Hovengen; João Breda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Analytical Assessment and Nutritional Adequacy of School Lunches in Sintra's Public Primary Schools.

Authors:  Telma Nogueira; Raquel J Ferreira; Vitória Dias da Silva; Mariana Liñan Pinto; Carlos Damas; Joana Sousa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Comparison of students' foodservice satisfaction between Korea and US.

Authors:  Eunkyung Jeong; Youngah Chun; Nami Joo; Ji-Young Yoon
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 1.926

10.  Local Wellness Policy 5 years later: is it making a difference for students in low-income, rural Colorado elementary schools?

Authors:  Elaine S Belansky; Nick Cutforth; Lynn Gilbert; Jill Litt; Hannah Reed; Sharon Scarbro; Julie A Marshall
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.