| Literature DB >> 22670230 |
Sachiko N Isobe, Hiroshi Hisano, Shusei Sato, Hideki Hirakawa, Kenji Okumura, Kenta Shirasawa, Shigemi Sasamoto, Akiko Watanabe, Tsuyuko Wada, Yoshie Kishida, Hisano Tsuruoka, Tsunakazu Fujishiro, Manabu Yamada, Mistuyo Kohara, Satoshi Tabata.
Abstract
White clover (Trifolium repens L.) is an allotetraploid species (2n = 4X = 32) that is widely distributed in temperate regions and cultivated as a forage legume. In this study, we developed expressed sequence tag (EST)-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, constructed linkage maps, and performed comparative mapping with other legume species. A total of 7982 ESTs that could be assembled into 5400 contigs and 2582 singletons were generated. Using the EST sequences that were obtained, 1973 primer pairs to amplify EST-derived SSR markers were designed and used for linkage analysis of 188 F(1) progenies, which were generated by a cross between two Japanese plants, '273-7' and 'T17-349,' with previously published SSR markers. An integrated linkage map was constructed by combining parental-specific maps, which consisted of 1743 SSR loci on 16 homeologous linkage groups with a total length of 2511 cM. The primer sequences of the developed EST-SSR markers and their map positions are available on http://clovergarden.jp/. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was observed on 9 of 16 linkage groups of a parental-specific map. The genome structures were compared among white clover, red clover (T. pratense L.), Medicago truncatula, and Lotus japonicus. Macrosynteny was observed across the four legume species. Surprisingly, the comparative genome structure between white clover and M. truncatula had a higher degree of conservation than that of the two clover species.Entities:
Keywords: comparative map; expressed sequence tag–simple sequence repeat; linkage disequilibrium; white clover
Year: 2012 PMID: 22670230 PMCID: PMC3362943 DOI: 10.1534/g3.112.002600
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Sources of SSR markers, numbers of markers screened, polymorphic markers, polymorphic ratio, and numbers of mapped markers and loci used for segregation analysis of the ’273-7’ × ’T17-349’ mapping population
| Marker Name | Source | Number of Markers Screened | Number of Polymorphic Markers | Polymorphic Ratio (%) | Number of Mapped Markers | Number of Mapped Loci | Average Number of Mapped Loci/Marker | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Sequences | Reference | |||||||
| WCS | White clover | EST | 1973 | 874 | 44.3 | 814 | 1200 | 1.5 | |
| RCS | Red clover | EST and genomic | 2518 | 305 | 12.1 | 282 | 412 | 1.5 | |
| prs | White clover | EST | 32 | 18 | 56.3 | 17 | 20 | 1.2 | |
| ats | White clover | Genomic | 30 | 27 | 90.0 | 27 | 41 | 1.5 | |
| TRSSR | White clover | Genomic | Kölliker | 26 | 22 | 84.6 | 20 | 26 | 1.3 |
| MTIC | EST | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 2 | 3 | 1.0 | ||
| AI, AJ, AL, AW, BE, BF, BG, BI, MTBA | EST | 36 | 28 | 77.8 | 25 | 38 | 1.5 | ||
| MT1 | BAC | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | ||
| Subtotal | 128 | 99 | 77.3 | 93 | 131 | 1.4 | |||
| Total | 4619 | 1278 | 27.7 | 1189 | 1743 | 1.5 | |||
On white clover linkage map in Zhang .
On an integrated linkage map.
SSRs in non-redundant white clover ESTs and designed EST-SSR primers
| SSR Pattern | SSR Numbers in Non-redundant White Clover ESTs | Frequency (%) | Designed EST-SSR Primers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mismatch 0 | Mismatch 1 | Mismatch 2 | Total | |||
| AG | 211 | 16.67 | 30 | 19 | 44 | 93 |
| AT | 22 | 1.74 | 7 | 3 | 15 | 25 |
| AC | 8 | 0.63 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 21 |
| GC | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AAC | 182 | 14.38 | 49 | 64 | 139 | 252 |
| AAG | 179 | 14.14 | 35 | 90 | 246 | 371 |
| GGT | 170 | 13.43 | 27 | 63 | 157 | 247 |
| ATC | 113 | 8.93 | 30 | 49 | 151 | 230 |
| AAT | 86 | 6.79 | 17 | 21 | 66 | 104 |
| AGC | 79 | 6.24 | 8 | 33 | 90 | 131 |
| GGA | 36 | 2.84 | 10 | 34 | 89 | 133 |
| GGC | 19 | 1.50 | 2 | 8 | 47 | 57 |
| ACT | 16 | 1.26 | 5 | 12 | 21 | 38 |
| ACG | 4 | 0.32 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 26 |
| AATG | 26 | 2.05 | 3 | 12 | 19 | 34 |
| AAAT | 23 | 1.82 | 4 | 13 | 30 | 47 |
| AAAG | 20 | 1.58 | 3 | 5 | 44 | 52 |
| AGTG | 8 | 0.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATAG | 8 | 0.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AATT | 8 | 0.63 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 22 |
| ATAC | 5 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AACC | 4 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AAAC | 4 | 0.32 | 0 | 9 | 34 | 43 |
| AACT | 3 | 0.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other tetra-nucleotide repeats | 32 | 2.53 | 4 | 8 | 35 | 47 |
| Total | 1266 | 100 | 241 | 456 | 1276 | 1973 |
Description of parental-specific and integrated maps
| LG | ‘273-7’-specific Map | ‘T17-349’-specific Map | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Loci | Length (cM) | Density | Segregation Distortion Ratio (%)b | Number of Loci | Length (cM) | Density | Segregation Distortion Ratio (%) | ||
| 1a | 54 | 153.0 | 2.83 | 50.0 | 63 | 153.8 | 2.44 | 71.4 | |
| 1b | 83 | 186.5 | 2.25 | 53.0 | 37 | 178.5 | 4.82 | 59.5 | |
| 2a | 55 | 122.3 | 2.22 | 34.5 | 62 | 197.6 | 3.20 | 58.1 | |
| 2b | 47 | 159.0 | 3.38 | 66.0 | 58 | 179.7 | 3.10 | 36.2 | |
| 3a | 82 | 150.0 | 1.83 | 19.5 | 51 | 154.5 | 3.03 | 37.3 | |
| 3b | 101 | 147.4 | 1.46 | 28.7 | 63 | 107.5 | 1.71 | 52.4 | |
| 4a | 100 | 158.3 | 1.58 | 26.0 | 62 | 129.4 | 2.09 | 75.8 | |
| 4b | 70 | 139.5 | 1.99 | 28.6 | 76 | 155.5 | 2.05 | 40.8 | |
| 5a | 64 | 138.2 | 2.16 | 29.7 | 64 | 142.4 | 2.22 | 35.9 | |
| 5b | 47 | 149.6 | 3.18 | 34.0 | 64 | 175.0 | 2.73 | 50.0 | |
| 6a | 24 | 97.6 | 4.07 | 41.7 | 22 | 120.5 | 5.48 | 54.6 | |
| 6b | 55 | 140.0 | 2.54 | 36.4 | 16 | 124.3 | 7.77 | 50.0 | |
| 7a | 38 | 129.3 | 3.40 | 57.9 | 56 | 252.3 | 4.51 | 44.6 | |
| 7b | 72 | 174.5 | 2.42 | 27.8 | 44 | 115.4 | 2.62 | 72.7 | |
| 8a | 89 | 126.8 | 1.43 | 31.5 | 85 | 174.5 | 2.05 | 60.0 | |
| 8b | 78 | 150.7 | 1.93 | 39.7 | 40 | 89.6 | 2.24 | 57.5 | |
| Total | 1059 | 2322.9 | 2.19 | 35.7 | 863 | 2450.3 | 2.84 | 53.3 | |
| LG | Integrated Map | ||||||||
| Number of Loci | Length (cM) | Density | Segregation Distortion Ratio (%) | ||||||
| 1a | 106 | 159.1 | 1.50 | 57.6 | |||||
| 1b | 113 | 190.9 | 1.69 | 62.0 | |||||
| 2a | 107 | 122.9 | 1.15 | 45.8 | |||||
| 2b | 98 | 207.8 | 2.12 | 50.0 | |||||
| 3a | 124 | 172.5 | 1.39 | 28.2 | |||||
| 3b | 146 | 142.6 | 0.98 | 41.8 | |||||
| 4a | 141 | 157.0 | 1.11 | 51.8 | |||||
| 4b | 134 | 177.1 | 1.32 | 35.8 | |||||
| 5a | 118 | 164.5 | 1.39 | 35.6 | |||||
| 5b | 108 | 156.2 | 1.45 | 39.8 | |||||
| 6a | (44) | (109.08) | (2.48) | (50.0) | |||||
| 6b | 63 | 132.4 | 2.10 | 39.7 | |||||
| 7a | 86 | 155.7 | 1.81 | 53.5 | |||||
| 7b | 101 | 151.5 | 1.50 | 46.5 | |||||
| 8a | 146 | 166.1 | 1.14 | 52.1 | |||||
| 8b | 108 | 146.0 | 1.35 | 44.4 | |||||
| Total | 1743 | 2511.3 | 1.44 | 45.6 | |||||
Average length between two loci.
A significant level at P < 0.05.
LG 6a was not integrated because of fewer bi-parental markers. Therefore, the number of locus and length were investigated as follows: number of locus = (total number of the parental-specific maps) – (number of commonly mapped markers on the parental-specific maps); length = average length of the parental-specific maps.
Figure 1An integrated linkage map of white clover generated from a mapping population of ‘273-7’ × ‘T17-349’. Positions of bi-parental, ‘273-7’-specific, and ‘T17-349’-specific loci are indicated by colors of linkage bars. Those showing normal segregation of bi-parental, ‘273-7’-specific, and ‘T17-349’-specific loci are green, red, and blue, respectively. Those showing distorted segregation of bi-parental, ‘273-7’-specific, and ‘T17-349’-specific loci are yellow-green, pink, and aqua, respectively. Distorted loci are preferentially represented when multiple loci, including the distorted loci, are closely located. Bars attached to linkage groups show numbers of mapped multiple loci per each 5 cM. The orange and yellow colors indicate when all multiple loci generated from a single marker are mapped onto the same or homeologous linkage groups, respectively, whereas purple represents other cases.
Figure 2Patterns of LD blocks of the parental-specific maps. Upper right and lower left triangles show LD blocks of ‘273-7’-specific and ‘T17-349’-specific maps, respectively. Colors in triangles indicate magnitudes of LD (r2) as listed on the right side.
Figure 3Graphical view of syntenic blocks between white and red clover. Loci generated common or orthologous markers identified by BLASTX searches with a cutoff E-value ≤ 1e−10. (A) Colors of lines represent white clover homeologous linkage groups of orthologous loci. (B) Colors of lines represent red clover linkage groups of orthologous loci.
Figure 4Graphical view of syntenic relationship between white clover, red clover, M. truncatula, and L. japonicus. Homologous regions were identified by BLASTX searches with a cutoff E-value ≤ 1e−10. Synteny blocks were defined as the region where three or more conserved homologs were located within a 10-cM region in the white and red clover linkage maps, and a 500-kb DNA stretch in the reference genomes. Syntenic regions between the two clover species and model legumes are connected by colored lines. Line colors represent white clover homeologous linkage groups and red clover linkage groups of orthologous loci. (A) Syntenic relationships between two clover species and M. truncatula. (B) Syntenic relationships between two clover species and L. japonicus.