Literature DB >> 22670056

Cell cycle- and DNA repair pathway-specific effects of apoptosis on tumor suppression.

Steven S Foster1, Saurav De, Linda K Johnson, John H J Petrini, Travis H Stracker.   

Abstract

The DNA damage response comprises DNA repair, cell-cycle checkpoint control, and DNA damage-induced apoptosis that collectively promote genomic integrity and suppress tumorigenesis. Previously, we have shown that the Chk2 kinase functions independently of the Mre11 complex (Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1) and ATM in apoptosis and suppresses tumorigenesis resulting from hypomorphic alleles of Mre11 or Nbs1. Based on this work, we have proposed that Chk2 limits the oncogenic potential of replication-associated DNA damage. Here we further address the role of Chk2 and damage-induced apoptosis in suppressing the oncogenic potential of chromosome breaks. We show that loss of Chk2 or a mutation in p53 (R172P), which selectively impairs its function in apoptosis, rescued the lethality of mice lacking Lig4, a ligase required for nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair of DNA double-strand breaks in G0/G1. In contrast to Lig4(-/-)p53(-/-) mice, Lig4(-/-)Chk2(-/-) and Lig4(-/-)p53(R172P/R172P) mice were not prone to organ-specific, rapid tumorigenesis. Although the severe NHEJ deficiency of Lig4(-/-) was a less potent initiator of tumorigenesis in the p53(R172P/R172P) and Chk2(-/-) backgrounds, where p53 cell-cycle functions are largely intact, even mild defects in the intra-S and G2/M checkpoints caused by mutations in Nbs1 are sufficient to influence malignancy in p53(R172P/R172P) mice. We conclude that the oncogenic potential of double-strand breaks resulting from NHEJ deficiency is highly restricted by nonapoptotic functions of p53, such as the G1/S checkpoint or senescence, suggesting that the particular facets of the DNA damage response required for tumor suppression are dictated by the proliferative status of the tumor-initiating cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22670056      PMCID: PMC3382548          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1120476109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

Review 1.  Origin of chromosomal translocations in lymphoid cancer.

Authors:  André Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Rad50 is dispensable for the maintenance and viability of postmitotic tissues.

Authors:  Carrie A Adelman; Saurav De; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends.

Authors:  Zhu Zhu; Woo-Hyun Chung; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing.

Authors:  Eleni P Mimitou; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity.

Authors:  Karlene A Cimprich; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease.

Authors:  Stephen P Jackson; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  p53-dependent senescence delays Emu-myc-induced B-cell lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  S M Post; A Quintás-Cardama; T Terzian; C Smith; C M Eischen; G Lozano
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work.

Authors:  Eleni P Mimitou; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-26

Review 9.  An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development.

Authors:  Thanos D Halazonetis; Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  DNA damage-induced cellular senescence is sufficient to suppress tumorigenesis: a mouse model.

Authors:  Thang Van Nguyen; Nahum Puebla-Osorio; Hui Pang; Melanie E Dujka; Chengming Zhu
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Association between the NBS1 Glu185Gln polymorphism and lung cancer risk: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lixin Wang; Jinsong Cheng; Jinyu Gao; Jipeng Wang; Xiaoning Liu; Liwen Xiong
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  DNA repair gene patterns as prognostic and predictive factors in molecular breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Libero Santarpia; Takayuki Iwamoto; Angelo Di Leo; Naoki Hayashi; Giulia Bottai; Martha Stampfer; Fabrice André; Nicholas C Turner; W Fraser Symmans; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Lajos Pusztai; Giampaolo Bianchini
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-09-26

Review 3.  The heart: mostly postmitotic or mostly premitotic? Myocyte cell cycle, senescence, and quiescence.

Authors:  Sailay Siddiqi; Mark A Sussman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  PNAS-4, an Early DNA Damage Response Gene, Induces S Phase Arrest and Apoptosis by Activating Checkpoint Kinases in Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Zhu Yuan; Wenhao Guo; Jun Yang; Lei Li; Meiliang Wang; Yi Lei; Yang Wan; Xinyu Zhao; Na Luo; Ping Cheng; Xinyu Liu; Chunlai Nie; Yong Peng; Aiping Tong; Yuquan Wei
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Excision of mutagenic replication-blocking lesions suppresses cancer but promotes cytotoxicity and lethality in nitrosamine-exposed mice.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Joshua J Corrigan; Amanda L Armijo; Ilana S Nazari; Ishwar N Kohale; Dorothea K Torous; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Robert G Croy; Dushan N Wadduwage; Sebastian E Carrasco; Stephen D Dertinger; Forest M White; John M Essigmann; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Bax deficiency extends the survival of Ku70 knockout mice that develop lung and heart diseases.

Authors:  J Ngo; M Matsuyama; C Kim; I Poventud-Fuentes; A Bates; S L Siedlak; H-G Lee; Y Q Doughman; M Watanabe; A Liner; B Hoit; N Voelkel; S Gerson; P Hasty; S Matsuyama
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  Centrosome defects cause microcephaly by activating the 53BP1-USP28-TP53 mitotic surveillance pathway.

Authors:  Thao P Phan; Aubrey L Maryniak; Christina A Boatwright; Junsu Lee; Alisa Atkins; Andrea Tijhuis; Diana Cj Spierings; Hisham Bazzi; Floris Foijer; Philip W Jordan; Travis H Stracker; Andrew J Holland
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  The ATM signaling network in development and disease.

Authors:  Travis H Stracker; Ignasi Roig; Philip A Knobel; Marko Marjanović
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Effect of GINS2 on proliferation and apoptosis in leukemic cell line.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Liang Zhong; Bei-Zhong Liu; Yan-Jun Gao; Yuan-Mei Gao; Xiu-Xiu Hu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  The Rad50 hook domain regulates DNA damage signaling and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Ramon Roset; Akiko Inagaki; Marcel Hohl; Fabienne Brenet; Julien Lafrance-Vanasse; Julian Lange; Joseph M Scandura; John A Tainer; Scott Keeney; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.