Sarah Song1, Jeffrey Saver. 1. Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, 710 Westwood Plaza, C109 RNRC, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1769, USA. sarahsong@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: States and counties in the US began implementing regional systems of acute stroke care in the first decade of the 21st century, whereby emergency medical services systems preferentially route acute stroke patients directly to primary stroke centers. The pace, geographic range, and population reach of regional stroke system implementation has not been previously delineated. METHODS: We performed a review of legislative archives, internet and media reports, consultation with American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and Centers for Disease Control staff, and phone interviews with state public health and emergency medical service officials from each of the 50 states. RESULTS: The first counties to adopt regional regulations supporting routing of acute stroke patients to primary stroke centers were in Alabama and Texas in 2000; the first states were Florida and Massachusetts in 2004. By 2010, 16 states had state-level legislation or regulations to enable emergency medical service routing to primary stroke centers, as did counties in 3 additional states. The US population covered by routing protocols increased substantially in the latter half of the decade, from 1.5% in 2000 to 53% of the US population by the end of 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The first decade of the 21st century witnessed a remarkable structural transformation in acute stroke care: by the end of 2010, over half of all Americans were living in states/counties with emergency medical service routing protocols supporting the direct transport of acute stroke patients to primary stroke centers. Additional efforts are needed to extend regional stroke systems of care to the rest of the US.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: States and counties in the US began implementing regional systems of acute stroke care in the first decade of the 21st century, whereby emergency medical services systems preferentially route acute strokepatients directly to primary stroke centers. The pace, geographic range, and population reach of regional stroke system implementation has not been previously delineated. METHODS: We performed a review of legislative archives, internet and media reports, consultation with American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and Centers for Disease Control staff, and phone interviews with state public health and emergency medical service officials from each of the 50 states. RESULTS: The first counties to adopt regional regulations supporting routing of acute strokepatients to primary stroke centers were in Alabama and Texas in 2000; the first states were Florida and Massachusetts in 2004. By 2010, 16 states had state-level legislation or regulations to enable emergency medical service routing to primary stroke centers, as did counties in 3 additional states. The US population covered by routing protocols increased substantially in the latter half of the decade, from 1.5% in 2000 to 53% of the US population by the end of 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The first decade of the 21st century witnessed a remarkable structural transformation in acute stroke care: by the end of 2010, over half of all Americans were living in states/counties with emergency medical service routing protocols supporting the direct transport of acute strokepatients to primary stroke centers. Additional efforts are needed to extend regional stroke systems of care to the rest of the US.
Authors: Mark J Alberts; Richard E Latchaw; Warren R Selman; Timothy Shephard; Mark N Hadley; Lawrence M Brass; Walter Koroshetz; John R Marler; John Booss; Richard D Zorowitz; Janet B Croft; Ellen Magnis; Diane Mulligan; Andrew Jagoda; Robert O'Connor; C Michael Cawley; J J Connors; Jean A Rose-DeRenzy; Marian Emr; Margo Warren; Michael D Walker Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-06-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: T J Crocco; J C Grotta; E C Jauch; S E Kasner; R U Kothari; B R Larmon; J L Saver; M R Sayre; S M Davis Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2007 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Heinrich J Audebert; Johannes Schenkel; Peter U Heuschmann; Ulrich Bogdahn; Roman L Haberl Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Paul A Heidenreich; Justin G Trogdon; Olga A Khavjou; Javed Butler; Kathleen Dracup; Michael D Ezekowitz; Eric Andrew Finkelstein; Yuling Hong; S Claiborne Johnston; Amit Khera; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Sue A Nelson; Graham Nichol; Diane Orenstein; Peter W F Wilson; Y Joseph Woo Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lee H Schwamm; Arthur Pancioli; Joe E Acker; Larry B Goldstein; Richard D Zorowitz; Timothy J Shephard; Peter Moyer; Mark Gorman; S Claiborne Johnston; Pamela W Duncan; Phil Gorelick; Jeffery Frank; Steven K Stranne; Renee Smith; William Federspiel; Katie B Horton; Ellen Magnis; Robert J Adams Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-02-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Harold P Adams; Gregory del Zoppo; Mark J Alberts; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence Brass; Anthony Furlan; Robert L Grubb; Randall T Higashida; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea Kidwell; Patrick D Lyden; Lewis B Morgenstern; Adnan I Qureshi; Robert H Rosenwasser; Phillip A Scott; Eelco F M Wijdicks Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-04-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Robert Adams; Joe Acker; Mark Alberts; Liz Andrews; Richard Atkinson; Kathy Fenelon; Anthony Furlan; Meighan Girgus; Katie Horton; Richard Hughes; Walter Koroshetz; Richard Latchaw; Ellen Magnis; Marc Mayberg; Arthur Pancioli; Rose Marie Robertson; Tim Shephard; Rene Smith; Sidney C Smith; Suzanne Smith; Steven K Stranne; Edgar J Kenton; Gil Bashe; Altagracia Chavez; Larry Goldstein; Richard Hodosh; Cindy Keitel; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Anne Leonard; Lewis Morgenstern; Jack Owen Wood Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M J Alberts; G Hademenos; R E Latchaw; A Jagoda; J R Marler; M R Mayberg; R D Starke; H W Todd; K M Viste; M Girgus; T Shephard; M Emr; P Shwayder; M D Walker Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-06-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Werner Hacke; Geoffrey Donnan; Cesare Fieschi; Markku Kaste; Rüdiger von Kummer; Joseph P Broderick; Thomas Brott; Michael Frankel; James C Grotta; E Clarke Haley; Thomas Kwiatkowski; Steven R Levine; Chris Lewandowski; Mei Lu; Patrick Lyden; John R Marler; Suresh Patel; Barbara C Tilley; Gregory Albers; Erich Bluhmki; Manfred Wilhelm; Scott Hamilton Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-03-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Joe E Acker; Arthur M Pancioli; Todd J Crocco; Marc K Eckstein; Edward C Jauch; Hollynn Larrabee; Neil M Meltzer; William C Mergendahl; John W Munn; Susanne M Prentiss; Charles Sand; Jeffrey L Saver; Brian Eigel; Brian R Gilpin; Mark Schoeberl; Penelope Solis; JoAnne R Bailey; Katie B Horton; Steven K Stranne Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Andrew D Wilcock; Kori S Zachrison; Lee H Schwamm; Lori Uscher-Pines; Jose R Zubizarreta; Ateev Mehrotra Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Lesli E Skolarus; William J Meurer; Krithika Shanmugasundaram; Eric E Adelman; Phillip A Scott; James F Burke Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michael T Mullen; Charles C Branas; Scott E Kasner; Catherine Wolff; Justin C Williams; Karen C Albright; Brendan G Carr Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael T Mullen; Douglas J Wiebe; Ariel Bowman; Catherine S Wolff; Karen C Albright; Jason Roy; Laura J Balcer; Charles C Branas; Brendan G Carr Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Eméfah C Loccoh; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Yun Wang; Dhruv S Kazi; Robert W Yeh; Rishi K Wadhera Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 24.094