Gregory Hansen1, Simerpreet Bal2, Kerri Lynn Schellenberg3, Susan Alcock4, Esseddeeg Ghrooda4. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada. 2. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Section of Neurology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1R9, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Stroke guideline compliance of rural Canadian prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) care in acute stroke is unknown. In this quality assurance study, we sought to compare rural and urban care by prehospital EMS evaluation/management indicators from patients assessed at an urban Canadian stroke center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred adult patients were randomly selected from the stroke registry. Patients were transported through Rural EMS bypass protocols or urban EMS protocols (both bypass and direct) to our stroke center between January and December 2013. Patients were excluded if they were first evaluated at any other health center. Prehospital care was assessed using ten indicators for EMS evaluation/management, as recommended by acute stroke guidelines. RESULTS: Compliance with acute stroke EMS evaluation/management indicators were statistically similar for both groups, except administrating a prehospital diagnostic tool (rural 31.8 vs. urban 70.3%; P = 0.002). Unlike urban EMS, rural EMS did not routinely document scene time. CONCLUSION: Rural EMS responders' compliance to prehospital stroke evaluation/management was similar to urban EMS responders. Growth areas for both groups may be with prehospital stroke diagnostic tool utilization, whereas rural EMS responders may also improve with scene time documentation.
OBJECTIVE:Stroke guideline compliance of rural Canadian prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) care in acute stroke is unknown. In this quality assurance study, we sought to compare rural and urban care by prehospital EMS evaluation/management indicators from patients assessed at an urban Canadian stroke center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred adult patients were randomly selected from the stroke registry. Patients were transported through Rural EMS bypass protocols or urban EMS protocols (both bypass and direct) to our stroke center between January and December 2013. Patients were excluded if they were first evaluated at any other health center. Prehospital care was assessed using ten indicators for EMS evaluation/management, as recommended by acute stroke guidelines. RESULTS: Compliance with acute stroke EMS evaluation/management indicators were statistically similar for both groups, except administrating a prehospital diagnostic tool (rural 31.8 vs. urban 70.3%; P = 0.002). Unlike urban EMS, rural EMS did not routinely document scene time. CONCLUSION: Rural EMS responders' compliance to prehospital stroke evaluation/management was similar to urban EMS responders. Growth areas for both groups may be with prehospital stroke diagnostic tool utilization, whereas rural EMS responders may also improve with scene time documentation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Emergency medical services; rural health; stroke
Authors: R J Riopelle; D C Howse; C Bolton; S Elson; D L Groll; D Holtom; D G Brunet; A C Jackson; M Melanson; D F Weaver Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jacques Joubert; Louise F Prentice; Thierry Moulin; Siaw-Teng Liaw; Lynette B Joubert; Pierre-Marie Preux; Dallas Ware; Elizabeth Medeiros de Bustos; Allan McLean Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Nerses Sanossian; David S Liebeskind; Marc Eckstein; Sidney Starkman; Samuel Stratton; Franklin D Pratt; William Koenig; Scott Hamilton; May Kim-Tenser; Robin Conwit; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Annika Berglund; Mia von Euler; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Maaret Castrén; Katarina Bohm Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Natalie Hanks; Ge Wen; Shuhan He; Sarah Song; Jeffrey L Saver; Steven Cen; May Kim-Tenser; William Mack; Nerses Sanossian Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2014-07