Literature DB >> 22669263

Expansion of a globally pervasive grass occurs without substantial trait differences between home and away populations.

A Leifso1, A S MacDougall, B Husband, J L Hierro, M Köchy, M Pärtel, D A Peltzer.   

Abstract

The global expansion of species beyond their ancestral ranges can derive from mechanisms that are trait-based (e.g., post-establishment evolved differences compared to home populations) or circumstantial (e.g., propagule pressure, with no trait-based differences). These mechanisms can be difficult to distinguish following establishment, but each makes unique predictions regarding trait similarity between ancestral ('home') and introduced ('away') populations. Here, we tested for trait-based population differences across four continents for the globally distributed grass Dactylis glomerata, to assess the possible role of trait evolution in its worldwide expansion. We used a common-environment glasshouse experiment to quantify trait differences among home and away populations, and the potential relevance of these differences for competitive interactions. Few significant trait differences were found among continents, suggesting minimal change during global expansion. All populations were polyploids, with similar foliar carbon:nitrogen ratios (a proxy for defense), chlorophyll content, and biomass. Emergence time and growth rate favored home populations, resulting in their competitive superiority over away populations. Small but significant trait differences among away populations suggest different introductory histories or local adaptive responses following establishment. In summary, the worldwide distribution of this species appears to have arisen from its pre-adapted traits promoting growth, and its repeated introduction with cultivation and intense propagule pressure. Global expansion can thus occur without substantial shifts in growth, reproduction, or defense. Rather than focusing strictly on the invader, invasion success may also derive from the traits found (or lacking) in the recipient community and from environmental context including human disturbance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669263     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2370-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species.

Authors:  Eric W Seabloom; W Stanley Harpole; O J Reichman; David Tilman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness.

Authors:  Mark van Kleunen; Wayne Dawson; Daniel Schlaepfer; Jonathan M Jeschke; Markus Fischer
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Reliable DNA ploidy determination in dehydrated tissues of vascular plants by DAPI flow cytometry--new prospects for plant research.

Authors:  Jan Suda; Pavel Trávnícek
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Plant science. An invasive plant paradox.

Authors:  Marnie E Rout; Ragan M Callaway
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges?

Authors:  C Thébaud; D Simberloff
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Species invasions and the limits to restoration: learning from the New Zealand experience.

Authors:  David A Norton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities.

Authors:  Jennifer Firn; Joslin L Moore; Andrew S MacDougall; Elizabeth T Borer; Eric W Seabloom; Janneke HilleRisLambers; W Stanley Harpole; Elsa E Cleland; Cynthia S Brown; Johannes M H Knops; Suzanne M Prober; David A Pyke; Kelly A Farrell; John D Bakker; Lydia R O'Halloran; Peter B Adler; Scott L Collins; Carla M D'Antonio; Michael J Crawley; Elizabeth M Wolkovich; Kimberly J La Pierre; Brett A Melbourne; Yann Hautier; John W Morgan; Andrew D B Leakey; Adam Kay; Rebecca McCulley; Kendi F Davies; Carly J Stevens; Cheng-Jin Chu; Karen D Holl; Julia A Klein; Philip A Fay; Nicole Hagenah; Kevin P Kirkman; Yvonne M Buckley
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Soil biota and exotic plant invasion.

Authors:  Ragan M Callaway; Giles C Thelen; Alex Rodriguez; William E Holben
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  California annual grass invaders: the drivers or passengers of change?

Authors:  Janneke Hillerislambers; Stephanie G Yelenik; Benjamin P Colman; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.256

10.  Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences.

Authors:  Robert I Colautti; John L Maron; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 5.183

View more
  2 in total

1.  Are invasive plants more competitive than native conspecifics? Patterns vary with competitors.

Authors:  Yulong Zheng; Yulong Feng; Alfonso Valiente-Banuet; Yangping Li; Zhiyong Liao; Jiaolin Zhang; Yajun Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The evolution of chemical defenses along invasion routes: Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) as a case study.

Authors:  Alexandra Magro; Felipe Ramon-Portugal; Benoît Facon; Christine Ducamp; Jean-Louis Hemptinne
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.