| Literature DB >> 22666565 |
Van Pham1, Hoang Nguyen, Le Huu Tho, Truong Tan Minh, Porntip Lerdboon, Rosemary Riel, Mackenzie S Green, Linda M Kaljee.
Abstract
With an increase in sexual activity among young adults in Vietnam and associated risks, there is a need for evidence-based sexual health interventions. This evaluation of three sexual health programs based on the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) was conducted in 12 communes in Ha Noi, Nha Trang City, and Ninh Hoa District. Inclusion criteria included unmarried youth 15-20 years residing in selected communes. Communes were randomly allocated to an intervention, and participants were randomly selected within each commune. The intervention programs included Vietnamese Focus on Kids (VFOK), the gender-based program Exploring the World of Adolescents (EWA), and EWA plus parental and health provider education (EWA+). Programs were delivered over a ten-week period in the communities by locally trained facilitators. The gender-based EWA program with parental involvement (EWA+) compared to VFOK showed significantly greater increase in knowledge. EWA+ in comparison to VFOK also showed significant decrease at immediate postintervention for intention to have sex. Sustained changes are observed in all three interventions for self-efficacy condom use, self-efficacy abstinence, response efficacy for condoms, extrinsic rewards, and perceived vulnerability for HIV. These findings suggest that theory-based community programs contribute to sustained changes in knowledge and attitudes regarding sexual risk among Vietnamese adolescents.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22666565 PMCID: PMC3362850 DOI: 10.1155/2012/986978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Res Treat ISSN: 2090-1240
Figure 1Protection Motivation Theory model.
Baseline demographic characteristics by intervention groups.
| Variables | VFOK | EWA | EWA+ | Overall |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years median (IQR) | 17 (16–19) | 17 (16–19) | 17 (16–19) | 17 (16–19) | 0.08 |
| Male, | 150 (47.3) | 132 (47.0) | 139 (50.9) | 421 (48.3) | 0.59 |
| In school, | 230 (72.6) | 223 (79.4) | 226 (82.9) | 679 (78.0) | 0.01 |
| Employed, | 85 (26.8) | 56 (19.9) | 47 (17.2) | 188 (21.6) | 0.01 |
| Religion, | |||||
| Buddhist | 144 (45.4) | 116 (41.3) | 125 (45.8) | 385 (44.2) | 0.01 |
| Ancestor | 73 (23.0) | 60 (21.4) | 38 (13.9) | 171 (19.6) | |
| Catholic | 23 (7.3) | 10 (3.6) | 22 (8.1) | 55 (6.3) | |
| Nonreligion | 77 (24.3) | 95 (33.8) | 88 (32.2) | 260 (29.9) | |
| Living w/both parents, | 283 (89.3) | 247 (87.9) | 240 (87.9) | 770 (88.4) | 0.83 |
| Accessible household items, median (IQR) | 5 (3–7) | 5 (2.5–7) | 6 (4–8) | 5 (3–7) | 0.01 |
| Monthly expense in 1000 Vietnamese Dong, median (IQR) | 150 (90–300) | 155 (100–300) | 150 (100–300) | 150 (100–300) | 0.28 |
a Reported P values were from Wilcoxon rank-sum test for comparing continuous variables and chi-squared for categorical variables. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
EWA: Exploring the World of Adolescents (youth intervention only); EWA+: Exploring the World of Adolescents (youth, parent, and healthcare provider interventions); IQR: Interquartile Range; VFOK: Vietnamese Focus on Kids.
Standard mean scores (with standard deviation) (range 0–100) for knowledge and PMT constructions at baseline and followups for VFOKa.
| Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Pregnancy/contraceptives | 51.45 (16.54) | 52.84 (17.18) | 52.58 (15.89) |
|
| STIs | 57.53 (18.55) |
|
| 56.32 (20.90) |
| HIV/AIDS | 56.76 (19.24) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Extrinsic rewards | 35.70 (18.58) |
|
|
|
| Intrinsic rewards | 38.83 (22.28) | 39.43 (21.96) |
| 39.29 (20.18) |
| Perceived severity-pregnancy | 31.90 (21.09) | 31.16 (17.12) | 32.38 (19.32) |
|
| Perceived severity-HIV/AIDS | 48.28 (17.45) | 47.85 (15.42) |
|
|
| Perceived vulnerability-sex | 45.19 (16.15) | 44.50 (14.27) |
|
|
| Perceived vulnerability-HIV/AIDS | 42.41 (16.21) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Self-efficacy condom use | 50.35 (33.45) |
|
|
|
| Self-efficacy abstinence | 80.95 (31.36) |
|
|
|
| Response efficacy | 71.19 (23.34) |
|
|
|
| Response cost | 36.06 (17.32) |
| 38.28 (18.24) | 35.76 (15.76) |
aSignificance calculated on adjusted mean change between baseline and each followup. Multilevel modeling (MLM) analysis adjusted for intervention group, evaluation times, interaction between intervention group and evaluation times, age, gender, religious group (any religion versus nonreligion), and socio-economic status.
*P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.
PMT: Protection Motivation Theory; VFOK: Vietnamese Focus on Kids.
Figure 2Statistically significant change (P < 0.05) for knowledge and PMT constructs by intervention (3, 6, and 12 months after intervention).
Standard mean scores (with standard deviation) (range 0–100) for knowledge and PMT constructions at baseline and follow-ups for EWAa.
| Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Pregnancy/contractive | 50.18 (15.38) |
|
| 48.99 (20.36) |
| STIs | 54.36 (19.16) |
|
| 55.85 (19.40) |
| HIV/AIDS | 54.94 (17.55) |
|
| 60.00 (21.24) |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Extrinsic rewards | 33.72 (18.27) |
|
|
|
| Intrinsic rewards | 35.69 (20.90) |
|
|
|
| Perceived severity-pregnancy | 30.78 (17.15) | 31.94 (16.14) | 31.47 (16.88) | 29.70 (16.85) |
| Perceived severity-HIV/AIDS | 46.76 (16.52) | 46.74 (14.19) | 45.14 (16.03) | 47.65 (15.71) |
| Perceived vulnerability-sex | 42.78 (14.61) |
| 43.32 (17.07) |
|
| Perceived vulnerability-HIV/AIDS | 42.79 (15.31) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Self-efficacy condom use | 51.35 (34.43) |
|
|
|
| Self-efficacy abstinence | 82.57 (31.39) |
|
|
|
| Response efficacy | 70.58 (22.27) |
|
|
|
| Response cost | 35.39 (17.13) | 35.04 (16.76) |
|
|
aSignificance calculated on adjusted mean change between baseline and each followup. Multilevel modeling (MLM) analysis adjusted for intervention group, evaluation times, interaction between intervention group and evaluation times, age, gender, religious group (any religion versus nonreligion), and socio-economic status. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.
EWA: exploring the world of adolescents (youth program); PMT: protection motivation.
Standard mean scores (with standard deviation) (range 0–100) for knowledge and PMT constructions at baseline and follow-ups for EWA+a.
| Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Pregnancy/contractive | 50.35 (15.74) |
|
|
|
| STIs | 57.14 (17.95) |
|
| 59.34 (21.67) |
| HIV/AIDS | 57.31 (18.19) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Extrinsic rewards | 32.02 (16.07) |
|
|
|
| Intrinsic rewards | 38.55 (20.48) | 40.51 (17.46) |
| 39.81 (17.73) |
| Perceived severity-pregnancy | 29.46 (17.04) | 31.02 (14.25) |
| 27.93 (16.62) |
| Perceived severity-HIV/AIDS | 47.72 (17.21) | 46.26 (13.84) |
| 45.81 (13.70) |
| Perceived vulnerability-sex | 45.15 (14.30) | 45.91 (12.53) | 41.23 (15.40) |
|
| Perceived vulnerability-HIV/AIDS | 46.43 (16.82) |
| 48.60 (18.27) |
|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Self-efficacy condom use | 59.71 (30.96) |
|
|
|
| Self-efficacy abstinence | 88.21 (26.90) |
|
|
|
| Response efficacy | 73.55 (19.04) |
|
|
|
| Response cost | 37.05 (17.24) |
| 37.40 (16.71) | 34.69 (13.64) |
aSignificance calculated on adjusted mean change between baseline and each followup. Multilevel modeling (MLM) analysis adjusted for intervention group, evaluation times, interaction between intervention group and evaluation times, age, gender, religious group (any religion versus nonreligion), and socio-economic status. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.
EWA+: Exploring the World of Adolescents (youth, parent, and healthcare provider program); PMT: Protection Motivation Theory.
Figure 3Percent of respondents with intention to have sex in the next 3 months by intervention (VFOK, EWA, and EWA+) and data collection point (3, 6, and 12 months).
Comparison of FOK and EWA/EWA+ intervention effect on knowledge through 12-month followupa.
| Constructs | EWA versus FOK (mean difference (SE)) | EWA+ versus FOK (mean difference (SE)) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Baseline | −1.33 (1.40) | −1.48 (1.42) |
| At 3 months | 2.01 (1.50) |
|
| At 6 months | 1.66 (1.57) |
|
| At 12 months | 0.57 (1.74) |
|
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Baseline |
| −0.76 (1.52) |
| At 3 months | −1.43 (1.60) | 1.70 (1.72) |
| At 6 months | −1.17 (1.67) | 2.79 (1.81) |
| At 12 months | −0.27 (1.84) |
|
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Baseline | −1.94 (1.61) | −0.45 (1.64) |
| At 3 months |
| −0.20 (1.81) |
| At 6 months |
| 0.09 (1.88) |
| At 12 months |
| −0.08 (2.04) |
a The effect was adjusted for age, gender, religious status, and social economic status. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.
EWA: Exploring the World of Adolescents (youth intervention only); EWA+: Exploring the World of Adolescents (youth, parent, and healthcare provider interventions); VFOK,Vietnamese Focus on Kids.