I K Warriner1, O Meirik, M Hoffman, C Morroni, J Harries, N T My Huong, N D Vy, A H Seuc. 1. UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva 1211, Switzerland. warrineri@who.int
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We assessed whether the safety of first-trimester manual vacuum aspiration abortion done by health-care providers who are not doctors (mid-level providers) is equivalent to that of procedures done by doctors in South Africa and Vietnam, where mid-level providers are government trained and accredited to do first-trimester abortions. METHODS: We did a randomised, two-sided controlled equivalence trial to compare rates of complication in abortions done by the two groups of providers. An a-priori margin of equivalence of 4.5% with 80% power and 95% CI (alpha=0.05) was used. 1160 women participated in South Africa and 1734 in Vietnam. Women presenting for an induced abortion at up to 12 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned to a doctor or a mid-level provider for manual vacuum aspiration and followed-up 10-14 days later. The primary outcome was complication of abortion. Complications were recorded during the abortion procedure, before discharge from the clinic, and at follow-up. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses were done. This trial is registered at with the identifier . FINDINGS: In both countries, rates of complication satisfied the predetermined statistical criteria for equivalence: rates per 100 patients in South Africa were 1.4 (eight of 576) for mid-level providers and 0 for doctors (difference 1.4, 95% CI 0.4 to 2.7); in Vietnam, rates were 1.2 (ten of 824) for mid-level providers and 1.2 (ten of 812) for doctors (difference 0.0, 95% CI -1.2 to 1.1). There was one immediate complication related to analgesics. Delayed complications were caused by retained products and infection. INTERPRETATION: With appropriate government training, mid-level health-care providers can provide first trimester manual vacuum aspiration abortions as safely as doctors can.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We assessed whether the safety of first-trimester manual vacuum aspiration abortion done by health-care providers who are not doctors (mid-level providers) is equivalent to that of procedures done by doctors in South Africa and Vietnam, where mid-level providers are government trained and accredited to do first-trimester abortions. METHODS: We did a randomised, two-sided controlled equivalence trial to compare rates of complication in abortions done by the two groups of providers. An a-priori margin of equivalence of 4.5% with 80% power and 95% CI (alpha=0.05) was used. 1160 women participated in South Africa and 1734 in Vietnam. Women presenting for an induced abortion at up to 12 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned to a doctor or a mid-level provider for manual vacuum aspiration and followed-up 10-14 days later. The primary outcome was complication of abortion. Complications were recorded during the abortion procedure, before discharge from the clinic, and at follow-up. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses were done. This trial is registered at with the identifier . FINDINGS: In both countries, rates of complication satisfied the predetermined statistical criteria for equivalence: rates per 100 patients in South Africa were 1.4 (eight of 576) for mid-level providers and 0 for doctors (difference 1.4, 95% CI 0.4 to 2.7); in Vietnam, rates were 1.2 (ten of 824) for mid-level providers and 1.2 (ten of 812) for doctors (difference 0.0, 95% CI -1.2 to 1.1). There was one immediate complication related to analgesics. Delayed complications were caused by retained products and infection. INTERPRETATION: With appropriate government training, mid-level health-care providers can provide first trimester manual vacuum aspiration abortions as safely as doctors can.
Authors: Tracy A Weitz; Diana Taylor; Sheila Desai; Ushma D Upadhyay; Jeff Waldman; Molly F Battistelli; Eleanor A Drey Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anna F Tyson; Nelson Msiska; Michelle Kiser; Jonathan C Samuel; Sean Mclean; Carlos Varela; Anthony G Charles Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Kenneth H Sherr; Mark A Micek; Sarah O Gimbel; Stephen S Gloyd; James P Hughes; Grace C John-Stewart; Rosa M Manjate; James Pfeiffer; Noel S Weiss Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Gertrude Voetagbe; Nathaniel Yellu; Joseph Mills; Ellen Mitchell; Amanda Adu-Amankwah; Koma Jehu-Appiah; Felix Nyante Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2010-02-23