| Literature DB >> 22666402 |
Francisco Rodriguez-Frías1, David Tabernero, Josep Quer, Juan I Esteban, Israel Ortega, Esteban Domingo, Maria Cubero, Sílvia Camós, Carles Ferrer-Costa, Alex Sánchez, Rosendo Jardí, Melanie Schaper, Maria Homs, Damir Garcia-Cehic, Jaume Guardia, Rafael Esteban, Maria Buti.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selection of amino acid substitutions associated with resistance to nucleos(t)ide-analog (NA) therapy in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) reverse transcriptase (RT) and their combination in a single viral genome complicates treatment of chronic HBV infection and may affect the overlapping surface coding region. In this study, the variability of an overlapping polymerase-surface region, critical for NA resistance, is investigated before treatment and under antiviral therapy, with assessment of NA-resistant amino acid changes simultaneously occurring in the same genome (linkage analysis) and their influence on the surface coding region. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22666402 PMCID: PMC3364280 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Fragment of HBV genome analyzed by UDPS.
A. Initially a 224-bp fragment of the HBV genome was amplified with the fusion primers, obtaining a 262-bp amplicon. After trimming both primer ends, a 180-nucleotide fragment was analyzed. The fragment contains the B and C domains of the HBV RT in the polymerase ORF, spanning rtY148 to rtV208, and a region of the overlapping surface ORF, from sT140 to sY200, including a part of the main hydrophilic region, which contains a small portion of the C-terminus of the immunodominant epitope “a determinant”, framed in green in the sequence below. B. The sequence framed in black corresponds to that of the 180-nucleotide fragment analyzed and shows its translation into aa in the P (above, depicted in blue) and S (below, depicted in red) ORFs. Most of the main codons related to nucleos(t)ide resistance (framed in blue), and the overlapping codons in the S ORF that may give rise to immune escape or stop codons (framed in red) are located within the analyzed fragment. Codons rt233, rt236, and rt250 were not considered relevant for the aims of this study and were not analyzed.
Enrichment in amino acid changes related to nucleos(t)ide analog resistance in the pre-treatment quasispecies.
| Patient (sample) | Resistance-related aa changes (Mean frequency) | Other aa changes (Mean frequency) |
|
|
| 0.04 | 0.06 |
|
|
| 0.09 | 0.07 |
|
|
| 0.06 | 0.05 |
|
|
| 0.08 | 0.03 |
|
aa, amino acid; N, number of reads obtained by ultra-deep pyrosequencing.
The mean frequency of amino acid changes related to nucleos(t)ide analog resistance (rtI169T, rtV173L, rtL180M, rtA181T/V, rtT184S/A/I/L/G/C/M, rtA194T, rtA202C/G/I, rtM204V/I [7], rtW153Q [18], rtV191I [19] and rtV207I [20]) obtained by ultra-deep pyrosequencing at pre-treatment was compared with the mean frequency of the remaining amino acid changes.
Figure 2Overall frequency of amino acid substitutions at each reverse transcriptase position.
Each bar represents the sum of frequencies of all amino acid changes occurring in each reverse transcriptase position. Each bar with a different color in the same position corresponds to one of the 8 samples studied in the 4 patients. Among these positions rtL155 (framed in red) was the least variable. Samples 1, 2, 3, 4A and 4B were obtained prior to antiviral treatment, whereas samples 4C, 4D and 4E correspond to completion of lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir treatments, respectively.
Relationship between frequencies of lamivudine resistance-related amino acid changes detected at pre-treatment and their selection at lamivudine viral breakthrough in the four patients.
| Patient (sample) | RT aa changes | Pre-treatment relative frequency by UDPS (%) | Selection at LMV VBK |
|
|
| 0 | No |
|
| 0.07 | No | |
|
| 0.07 | No | |
|
| 0.06 | No | |
|
|
| 0 | LiPA & Seq |
|
| 0.18 | No | |
|
| 0.35 | No | |
|
| 0.09 | LiPA & Seq | |
|
|
| 0 | LiPA & Seq |
|
| 0.07 | No | |
|
| 0.09 | No | |
|
| 0.05 | LiPA & Seq | |
|
|
| 0 | LiPA |
|
| 0.09 | LiPA & Seq | |
|
| 0.08 | No | |
|
| 0 | LiPA |
aa, amino acid; LiPA, INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2 assay; LMV, lamivudine, N, number of reads obtained by UDPS; RT, reverse transcriptase; Seq, direct sequencing; UDPS, ultra-deep pyrosequencing; VBK, virologic breakthrough (increase in serum HBV-DNA levels, confirmed by real-time PCR, of at least 1 log10IU/mL compared with the lowest value during NA treatment [6]).
Comparison between the relative frequencies of lamivudine-resistant variants detected by UDPS at pre-treatment and their subsequent detection by reverse hybridization (INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2 assay) and/or direct sequencing at lamivudine viral breakthrough in the four patients.
Frequencies of amino acid substitutions with the highest variability during sequential treatment in each of the five treatment samples.
| Amino acid substitutions | 4A | 4B | 4C | 4D | 4E |
|
|
| 0 | 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.02 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | 0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.01 | 0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.09 | 0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.05 | 0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.02 |
|
|
| 0.08 | 0.03 |
| 0.09 | 0 |
|
|
| 0.01 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
|
|
| A181S | 0.02 | 0.01 |
|
| 0 |
|
| A200V | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
|
|
| I162T | 0.08 | 0.06 |
|
| 0 |
|
| K149N | 0.02 | 0 | 0.06 |
| 0 |
|
| L157M |
|
|
|
| 0.02 |
|
| K154Q | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| 0.06 |
|
| R153W | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| 0.03 |
|
| V163I | 0.10 | 0.04 |
|
| 0.03 |
|
| V173M | 0.07 | 0.04 |
|
| 0 |
|
| K154T | 0.01 | 0.03 |
|
| 0 |
|
| I169L | 0.03 | 0.03 |
|
| 0.08 |
|
| R167H | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
|
|
| V207M |
| 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
|
|
| G152R | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
|
|
| R153Q |
| 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 0.07 |
|
| A194T | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
| 0.06 |
|
|
| 32724 | 35662 | 25289 | 19740 | 23249 |
SD, standard deviation;
n, Frequencies below the mismatch error rate (0.03%).
Frequencies of reverse transcriptase amino acid substitutions with the highest variability during sequential antiviral treatment, according to their standard deviation, in the 5 samples analyzed in patient 4 (4A and 4B correspond to pre-treatment, and 4C, 4D and 4E correspond to completion of lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir, respectively). Substitutions are arranged in descending order, from the most to the least variable. Frequencies of substitutions ≥0.1% in any sample are shown in bold. Substitutions selected for linkage analysis are shown in bold.
Figure 3Differences in variability throughout the fragment of reverse transcriptase and overlapping surface region analyzed.
In the pre-treatment samples (1 to 4A), each bar represents the difference between the average frequency of amino acid substitutions in each reverse transcriptase (RT) position and its overlapped amino acid in the surface (S) region, assuming that any substitution in the first nucleotide of an RT codon affects the third nucleotide of the overlapping S codon. Bars with positive values indicate positions with a higher tolerance for amino acid substitutions in RT than in S, whereas the opposite is indicated by bars with negative values.
Figure 4Longitudinal virologic and biochemical outcome of patient 4.
Thick arrows indicate the sampling time and thin arrows specify mutations detected by reverse hybridization (INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2 assay) and/or direct sequencing, which are shown in bold in samples analyzed by UDPS. * This variant was not consistently observed by Sanger sequencing.
Nucleotide and amino acid divergences in the S and P ORFs in each sample from patient 4.
| 4A | 4B | 4C | 4D | 4E | ||
|
| 9.72 | 8.23 | 82.50 | 70.84 | 99.69 | |
|
|
| 7.60 | 5.57 | 82.03 | 69.70 | 99.69 |
|
| 9.64 | 7.34 | 80.59 | 70.37 | 99.67 | |
|
| 9.72 | 8.23 | 41.63 | 51.33 | 35.53 | |
|
|
| 7.60 | 5.57 | 39.65 | 48.17 | 31.01 |
|
| 9.64 | 7.34 | 41.05 | 50.56 | 33.95 | |
NT Master, nucleotide master sequence; P Master, amino acid master sequence in polymerase (P) ORF; S Master, amino acid master sequence in surface (S) ORF.
Nucleotide and amino acid divergences in samples from patient 4 (4A and 4B correspond to pre-treatment, and 4C, 4D and 4E correspond to completion of lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir, respectively). In each sample, divergences were calculated as the percentage of all sequences different from the master of the first baseline sample processed (sample 4A) (Baseline Master), and the percentage of all sequences different from the master of the sample where they were obtained (Sample Master).
Linkage analysis of the most variable amino acid substitutions during sequential treatment.
| Combined variants | 4A | 4B | 4C | 4D | 4E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.30 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.01 |
|
|
|
| 0.09 | 0.05 |
|
| 0.10 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
|
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.01 |
|
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 0.27 | 0.11 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 0.22 |
|
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 0.18 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.05 |
|
|
|
| 0.59 |
| 0.78 |
| 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
|
|
| 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
|
|
| 32724 | 35662 | 25289 | 19740 | 23249 |
SD, standard deviation;
n,Frequencies below the mismatch error rate (0.03%); BC, Baseline combination (the master combination of positions where substitutions with the highest variation, shown in bold in Table 3, were located).
Frequencies of combinations (linkage) of the 10 amino acid substitutions with the highest standard deviation of frequencies in the 5 sequential treatment samples from patient 4 (4A and 4B correspond to pre-treatment and 4C, 4D and 4E correspond to completion of lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir, respectively). The variant combinations are presented in decreasing order (from most to least variable). Frequencies of combinations ≥1% are shown in bold.
Figure 5Changes in percentages of reverse transcriptase variants during follow-up of patient 4.
Frequencies of the most variable variants in the 5 samples from patient 4 (ie, those detected in frequencies ≥1% by linkage analysis in any of the samples) are shown in a pie chart for each sample. Each variant has been numbered as sorted in Table 5 (by decreasing SD of the frequency), except for the variant with no mutations in any of the positions included in the analysis. This variant, which was the most variable of all, is designated baseline combination.
Baseline characteristics of the patients included and outcome during LMV treatment.
| BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS | LAMIVUDINE TREATMENT | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 70 | F | 6.54 | 112 | 28 | HBeAg seroconversion and virologic response | None |
| 2 | 52 | M | 6.08 | 53 | 51 | Partial virologic response (2.2 log | rtM204V+rtL180M |
| 3 | 54 | M | 7.08 | 73 | 39 | Partial virologic response (4.2 log | rtM204V+rtL180M |
| 4 | 32 | M | 8.44 | 39 | 19 | Partial virologic response (2.6 log | rtM204V+rtL180M+rtA181T |
F, female; M, male; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; log, HBV-DNA (log10IU/mL);
, HBV-DNA decrease 6 months after beginning lamivudine treatment relative to baseline;
, HBV-DNA levels at virologic breakthrough, which determined the end of lamivudine treatment and occurred at the end of the period indicated in the Duration column.
HBV-DNA was quantified using real-time PCR (Cobas Ampliprep-Taqman, Roche; sensitivity 20 IU/mL), and resistant variants were determined in the sample obtained at viral breakthrough by LiPA (INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2 assay) and/or direct sequencing. The response to lamivudine treatment was defined as:
- HBeAg seroconversion: Loss of hepatitis B e antigen with detection of anti-HBe antibodies.
- Virologic response: undetectable HBV-DNA levels by real-time PCR within 48 weeks (12 months) of therapy [6].
- Partial virologic response: decrease in HBV DNA of more than 1 log10IU/mL, but detectable HBV DNA by real-time PCR, assessed at 24 weeks (6 months) of treatment, for lamivudine [6].
- VBK: virologic breakthrough - increase in serum HBV-DNA levels of at least 1 log10IU/mL compared to the lowest value during NA treatment, confirmed by real-time PCR [6].
Poisson model for quantification of artifactual errors.
| Homopolymeric (r = 1) | A | C | T | G |
|
| 1 | 2.34×10−6 | 2.04×10−6 | 3.49×10−6 |
|
| 4.98×10−6 | 1 | 3.56×10−5 | 1.95×10−5 |
|
| 3.99×10−6 | 2.91×10−6 | 1 | 2.04×10−6 |
|
| 1.50×10−4 | 3.92×10−5 | 4.40×10−6 | 1 |
The nucleotide (nt) expected to be found at a given position is expressed as , “s” indicates sequence position (s = 1 to 180) and “i” indicates nt of the master sequence found in “s” position (1 = A, 2 = C, 3 = T, 4 = G). An observed variant “s” is represented as , where “j” indicates the nt substitution (1 = A, 2 = C, 3 = T, 4 = G); represents the number of occurrences of an “i” to “j” substitution ( to ) in the N reads covering an “s”. The distribution of mismatch errors was approximated using Poisson distribution, extended to make the parameters depend on the type of mismatch error (12 possible substitutions [A∶C, A∶T, A∶G, C∶A, C∶T, C∶G, T∶A, T∶C, T∶G, G∶A, G∶C, G∶T]) and the region type (homopolymeric/non-homopolymeric). Thus, assuming as a Poisson-distributed random variable, the P-value associated with this test was calculated as:In which λ is the expected number of errors to at “s” site: with r referring to the type of region (r = 1 for homopolymeric and r = 2 for non-homopolymeric), with μijr values from the array of mismatch frequencies shown in the table. For example, if a T to A change is found (i = 3 and j = 1) at a certain site in a non-homopolymeric region, (r = 2), then and . In a type of filter strategy, after applying the Poisson formula, variants with a low probability of being erroneous (P<0.05) were included in the analysis.