PURPOSE:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a targetable receptor frequently overexpressed in basal-like breast cancer, which comprises most triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), the only subtype without established targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized phase II trial, patients with metastatic TNBC receivedanti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) load then 250 mg/m(2) per week intravenously [IV]) alone, with carboplatin (area under the curve of 2, once per week IV) added after progression or as concomitant therapy from the beginning. Response rate (RR) was the primary end point; others included time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Embedded correlative studies included molecular subtyping on archival tissue. Fresh tumor tissue before and after 7 to 14 days of therapy was used for microarray analyses exploring EGFR pathway activity and inhibition. RESULTS: In 102 patients with TNBC, RRs were 6% (two of 31) to cetuximab and 16% (four of 25) to cetuximab plus carboplatin after progression. RR to those treated from the beginning with cetuximab plus carboplatin was 17% (12 of 71); 31% of patients responded or had prolonged disease stabilization. The cetuximab plus carboplatin regimen was well tolerated, but both TTP and OS were short at 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 5.5 months) and 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.7 to 13.1 months), respectively. Of 73 patients with archival tissue for analysis, 74% had basal-like molecular subtype. Sixteen patients had tumor biopsies before and 1 week after therapy; genomic patterns of the EGFR pathway showed activation in 13 and inhibition by therapy in five. CONCLUSION: Despite strong preclinical data, combination cetuximab plus carboplatin in metastatic TNBC produced responses in fewer than 20% of patients. EGFR pathway analysis showed that most TNBCs involved activation. However, cetuximab blocked expression of the EGFR pathway in only a minority, suggesting that most had alternate mechanisms for pathway activation.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a targetable receptor frequently overexpressed in basal-like breast cancer, which comprises most triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), the only subtype without established targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized phase II trial, patients with metastatic TNBC received anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) load then 250 mg/m(2) per week intravenously [IV]) alone, with carboplatin (area under the curve of 2, once per week IV) added after progression or as concomitant therapy from the beginning. Response rate (RR) was the primary end point; others included time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Embedded correlative studies included molecular subtyping on archival tissue. Fresh tumor tissue before and after 7 to 14 days of therapy was used for microarray analyses exploring EGFR pathway activity and inhibition. RESULTS: In 102 patients with TNBC, RRs were 6% (two of 31) to cetuximab and 16% (four of 25) to cetuximab plus carboplatin after progression. RR to those treated from the beginning with cetuximab plus carboplatin was 17% (12 of 71); 31% of patients responded or had prolonged disease stabilization. The cetuximab plus carboplatin regimen was well tolerated, but both TTP and OS were short at 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 5.5 months) and 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.7 to 13.1 months), respectively. Of 73 patients with archival tissue for analysis, 74% had basal-like molecular subtype. Sixteen patients had tumor biopsies before and 1 week after therapy; genomic patterns of the EGFR pathway showed activation in 13 and inhibition by therapy in five. CONCLUSION: Despite strong preclinical data, combination cetuximab plus carboplatin in metastatic TNBC produced responses in fewer than 20% of patients. EGFR pathway analysis showed that most TNBCs involved activation. However, cetuximab blocked expression of the EGFR pathway in only a minority, suggesting that most had alternate mechanisms for pathway activation.
Authors: Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tomasz Byrski; Jacek Gronwald; Tomasz Huzarski; Ewa Grzybowska; Magdalena Budryk; Malgorzata Stawicka; Tomasz Mierzwa; Marek Szwiec; Rafal Wisniowski; Monika Siolek; Rebecca Dent; Jan Lubinski; Steven Narod Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Fabrice Andre; Bastien Job; Philippe Dessen; Attila Tordai; Stefan Michiels; Cornelia Liedtke; Catherine Richon; Kai Yan; Bailang Wang; Gilles Vassal; Suzette Delaloge; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Vladimir Lazar; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bert H O'Neil; Robert Allen; David R Spigel; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Dominic T Moore; Jordan D Berlin; Richard M Goldberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jason I Herschkowitz; Karl Simin; Victor J Weigman; Igor Mikaelian; Jerry Usary; Zhiyuan Hu; Karen E Rasmussen; Laundette P Jones; Shahin Assefnia; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Michael G Backlund; Yuzhi Yin; Andrey I Khramtsov; Roy Bastein; John Quackenbush; Robert I Glazer; Powel H Brown; Jeffrey E Green; Levy Kopelovich; Priscilla A Furth; Juan P Palazzo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Philip S Bernard; Gary A Churchill; Terry Van Dyke; Charles M Perou Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Nikolas Balanis; Michael K Wendt; Barbara J Schiemann; Zhenghe Wang; William P Schiemann; Cathleen R Carlin Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jennifer A Crozier; Pooja P Advani; Betsy LaPlant; Timothy Hobday; Anthony J Jaslowski; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Edith A Perez Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Ronald A Lubet; Eva Szabo; Kenneth K Iwata; Stanley C Gill; Chris Tucker; Ann Bode; Vernon E Steele; M Margaret Juliana; Holly L Nicastro; Clinton J Grubbs Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2013-03-26
Authors: Peter Cruz-Gordillo; Megan E Honeywell; Nicholas W Harper; Thomas Leete; Michael J Lee Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Eva Tonsing-Carter; Barbara J Bailey; M Reza Saadatzadeh; Jixin Ding; Haiyan Wang; Anthony L Sinn; Kacie M Peterman; Tiaishia K Spragins; Jayne M Silver; Alyssa A Sprouse; Taxiarchis M Georgiadis; T Zachary Gunter; Eric C Long; Robert E Minto; Christophe C Marchal; Christopher N Batuello; Ahmad R Safa; Helmut Hanenberg; Paul R Territo; George E Sandusky; Lindsey D Mayo; Christine M Eischen; Harlan E Shannon; Karen E Pollok Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 6.261