Literature DB >> 22663169

All-cause and potentially disease-related health care costs associated with venous thromboembolism in commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid beneficiaries.

Patrick Lefebvre1, François Laliberté, Edith A Nutescu, Mei Sheng Duh, Joyce LaMori, Brahim K Bookhart, William H Olson, Katherine Dea, Jeff Schein, Scott Kaatz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk of developing recurrent VTE and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), a complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) characterized by venous reflux and residual venous obstruction that may manifest as chronic pain and swelling. Therefore, formulary/policy decision makers should understand the clinical and economic consequences associated with VTE.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the real-world clinical complications, such as recurrent VTE and PTS, associated with VTE and quantify the incremental direct all-cause and potentially disease-related health care costs associated with VTE.
METHODS: Health insurance claims between January 2004 and December 2008 from the Ingenix Impact database were used. Adult patients with an initial VTE diagnosis (index DVT, pulmonary embolism [PE], or both) with at least 12 months of enrollment prior to the index VTE were matched 1:1 with comparison patients without VTE. Matching criteria included demographic factors, baseline health care costs, and diagnoses of VTE risk factors such as multiple traumas, malignant cancer, or major surgery. Each patient's observation period began on the date of the index VTE, or corresponding study index date for comparison cases, and ended on the earliest of 1 year after the study index date, the health plan disenrollment date, or December 31, 2008. The proportions of patients with (a) recurrent hospital-documented VTE, defined as an inpatient episode with a diagnosis of VTE in any claim field; (b) PTS; and (c) other potentially disease-related diagnoses (thrombocytopenia, superficial venous thrombosis, venous ulcer, pulmonary hypertension, stasis dermatitis, and venous insufficiency) were calculated. Health care costs were defined as standardized net provider payments after subtraction of member cost-sharing amounts. All-cause incremental health care costs and disease-related costs, defined as provider payments for hospitalization or outpatient claims with a primary or secondary diagnosis of VTE, PTS, or any of the potentially disease-related diagnoses, were computed. Costs were calculated per patient per year (PPPY) by weighting each patient's total cost for up to 1 year post-index by the length of follow-up.
RESULTS: The matched VTE and no-VTE cohorts included 16,969 subjects in each group. The index VTE event was DVT, PE, or both in 12,711, 2,473, and 1,785 patients, respectively. In the VTE cohort, the risks of recurrent VTE and PTS during the follow-up period (mean [SD] observation of 271.7 [121.6] days) were 3.6% and 7.1%, respectively. Patients with VTE had significantly higher average PPPY all-cause costs compared with the no-VTE patients (mean [SD] $33,531 [$70,393] vs. $17,590 [$42,011]; cost difference = $15,941, 95% CI = $14,819-$17,012). Corresponding potentially disease-related health care costs PPPY were also significantly higher for the VTE group (mean [SD] $3,141 [$17,055] vs. $228 [$3,221]; cost difference = $2,913, 95% CI = $2,693-$3,157) and represented 18.3% (i.e., $2,913 of $15,941) of the all-cause cost difference between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large matched-cohort study, VTE was associated with a 3.6% risk of hospital-documented recurrence and a 7.1% risk of PTS up to 1 year after index VTE. Potentially disease-related costs represented approximately one-fifth of the incremental all-cause costs associated with VTE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22663169     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.5.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  10 in total

1.  Therapeutic Enoxaparin in the Morbidly Obese Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Claudia M Hanni; Sheila M Wilhelm; Bianca Korkis; Elizabeth A Petrovitch; Kanella V Tsilimingras; Sean M McConachie
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-09-22

Review 2.  The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard E Nelson; Kwame A Nyarko; Lisa C Richardson; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 3.  Review of the cost of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Maria M Fernandez; Susan Hogue; Ronald Preblick; Winghan Jacqueline Kwong
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-08-28

4.  Management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: the economic burden of hospitalizations.

Authors:  Isabelle Mahé; Didier Mayeur; Ivan Krakowski
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Rationale and design of three observational, prospective cohort studies including biobanking to evaluate and improve diagnostics, management strategies and risk stratification in venous thromboembolism: the VTEval Project.

Authors:  Bernd Frank; Liana Ariza; Heidrun Lamparter; Vera Grossmann; Jürgen H Prochaska; Alexander Ullmann; Florentina Kindler; Gerhard Weisser; Ulrich Walter; Karl J Lackner; Christine Espinola-Klein; Thomas Münzel; Stavros V Konstantinides; Philipp S Wild
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Impact of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among patients with venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  François Laliberté; Brahim K Bookhart; Winnie W Nelson; Patrick Lefebvre; Jeff R Schein; Jonathan Rondeau-Leclaire; Mei Sheng Duh
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  The use of qualitative methods in venous thromboembolism research.

Authors:  Jackeline Hernandez-Nino; Mary Thomas; Andreia B Alexander; Mary A Ott; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-09-12

8.  The risk of deep vein thrombosis in total joint patients compared to orthopaedic trauma patients: Need for new prevention guidelines.

Authors:  Michelle Shen; Norele J Cutrera; Ashley C Dodd; Christopher Wallace; Frank R Avilucea; Craig Melbourne; Alex A Jahangir; Hassan H Mir; William T Obremskey; Manish K Sethi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-01-10

9.  What Are the Risk Factors for an Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis After Orthopaedic Irrigation and Debridement and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement?

Authors:  Mark J Lambrechts; Bradley S Spence; Shelby M Harris; Andrea Gilmore; Jasraj Marjara; Zhengye Si; Blaine T Manning; James L Cook; Emily V Leary; Matthew J Smith
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug

10.  Recurrent hospitalization and healthcare resource use among patients with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: findings from a multi-payer analysis.

Authors:  Kathleen Lang; Aarti A Patel; Michael Munsell; Brahim K Bookhart; Samir H Mody; Jeff R Schein; Joseph Menzin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.300

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.