| Literature DB >> 22662232 |
Nghia Ho Dang Trung1, Tu Le Thi Phuong, Marcel Wolbers, Hoang Nguyen Van Minh, Vinh Nguyen Thanh, Minh Pham Van, Nga Tran Vu Thieu, Tan Le Van, Diep To Song, Phuong Le Thi, Thao Nguyen Thi Phuong, Cong Bui Van, Vu Tang, Tuan Hoang Ngoc Anh, Dong Nguyen, Tien Phan Trung, Lien Nguyen Thi Nam, Hao Tran Kiem, Tam Nguyen Thi Thanh, James Campbell, Maxine Caws, Jeremy Day, Menno D de Jong, Chau Nguyen Van Vinh, H Rogier Van Doorn, Hien Tran Tinh, Jeremy Farrar, Constance Schultsz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) remain common and life-threatening, especially in developing countries. Knowledge of the aetiological agents responsible for these infections is essential to guide empiric therapy and develop a rational public health policy. To date most data has come from patients admitted to tertiary referral hospitals in Asia and there is limited aetiological data at the provincial hospital level where most patients are seen.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22662232 PMCID: PMC3360608 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Locations of study sites.
Map of southern Vietnam indicating participating hospitals and population density in the catchment area of each site.
Case definitions of clinical syndromes.
| Bacterial meningitis (modified from case definition of BM of WHO | |
|
|
|
| -Positive culture, Gram stain or real-time PCR of CSF sample | -Sudden onset of fever (>38°C) (less than 7 days) |
| -Positive bacterial blood culture and clinical syndrome consistent with BM (see probable criteria) | -AND at least one of the following signs: |
| oMeningeal signs (neck stiffness, Kernig sign and Brudzinski sign) | |
| OAltered consciousness | |
| -AND CSF examination showing at least one of the following: | |
| oLeukocytosis (≥10 cells/µl) AND at least 2 of the following criteria | |
| •an elevated protein (>1 g/l) | |
| •decreased glucose (<2.2 mmol/l or less than 50% of blood glucose) | |
| •lactate ≥4 mmol/l | |
| OTurbid appearance (when WC is missing or WC <10/µl) | |
| -AND no aetiologic agent was identified | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| -Laboratory confirmation by real-time PCR (enterovirus and | -Acute onset of fever (less than 7 days) |
| -A case was classified as probable Japanese encephalitis (JE) if a patient had the following criteria: | -AND at least one of the following: |
| oFulfilled the case definition of probable VE/M | OMeningeal signs (neck stiffness, Kernig sign, and Brudzinski sign) |
| oJEV specific IgM titre in CSF was in the range from 8–12 U | oChange in mental status (confusion, disorientation, coma or inability to talk) |
| oNo other pathogen detected. | oNew onset of seizures (excluding simple febrile seizures) |
| -A case was classified as Dengue encephalitis/meningitis, if Dengue virus specific IgM titre in CSF was higher than 12 U | -AND CSF examination showing at least one of the following: |
| -A case was classified as possible Dengue encephalitis/meningitis if patient had the following criteria: | OLeukocytosis (≥10 cells/µl) AND at least 2 of these criteria |
| oFulfilled case definition of probable VE/M | •protein ≤1 g/l |
| oDengue virus specific IgM titre in CSF was in the range from 8–12 U | •normal glucose (≥2.2 mmol/l or ≥50% of blood glucose) |
| oNo other pathogen detected. | •lactate <4 mmol/l |
| OClear appearance (when WC is missing or WC <10/µl) | |
| -AND no aetiologic agent was identified | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| Positive smear (acid-fast bacilli, AFB) or real-time PCR of CSF | -Total diagnostic score ≥10 (when cerebral imaging is not available) or ≥12 (when cerebral imaging is available) |
| -At least 2 points should either come from CSF or cerebral imaging criteria. | |
|
| |
| -Total diagnostic score of 6–9 points (when cerebral imaging is not available) or 6–11 points (when cerebral imaging is available) | |
| -Possible tuberculosis cannot be diagnosed or excluded without doing a lumbar puncture or cerebral imaging. | |
|
| |
| An India ink stain of CSF positive showing encapsulated yeasts, or | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| Meningitis and a percentage of eosinophils in CSF greater than 10% | -Percentage of eosinophilic cells in blood >10% |
| -AND meningitis manifestations | |
| -AND no pathogen confirmed in CSF by culture, PCR or ELISA method | |
If lactate concentration was not available, a patient was diagnosed as BM when having at least one of the remaining criteria.
If lactate concentration was not available, a patient was diagnosed as VE/M when having the two remaining criteria.
Figure 2Study profile.
(*) Other diagnosis included sinusitis (5 cases), brain tumours (9 cases), cerebral malaria (8 cases), mental disorders (7 cases), headache (7 cases), typhoid fever (5 cases), fever unknown origin (3 cases), autoimmune diseases (12 cases), diarrhoea (6 cases), lumbar disc herniation (2 cases), congenital heart diseases (2 cases), hydrocephalus (1 case), tetanus (1 case), severe anaemia (1 case) and chronic colitis (1 case).
Demographic data, clinical diagnosis and outcome of patients with CNS infection enrolled in the study.
| Characteristics | Adults (n = 617) | Children (n = 624) | p value |
|
| 38 (24; 52) | 4 (1.29; 9) | _ |
|
| 431 (70) | 385 (62) | 0.002 |
|
| 502 (81) | 527 (85) | 0.1 |
|
| <0.001 | ||
| -Mekong river delta | 353 (57) | 309 (49) | |
| -Central Viet Nam | 211 (34) | 204 (33) | |
| -Central highlands | 38 (6) | 104 (17) | |
| -South East | 10 (2) | 6 (1) | |
| -Others | 5 (1) | 1 (0) | |
|
| <0.001 | ||
| -Kinh | 528 (86) | 478 (77) | |
| -Khmer | 64 (10) | 68 (11) | |
| -E de | 10 (1.5) | 27 (4) | |
| -Raglai | 3 (0.5) | 14 (2) | |
| -Others | 12 (2) | 37 (6) | |
|
| |||
| -Positive | 10 (2) | 0 (0) | - |
| -Negative | 488 (79) | 50 (8) | - |
| -Unknown | 119 (19) | 574 (92) | - |
|
| <0.001 | ||
| -Bacterial meningitis | 302 (49) | 150 (24) | |
| oConfirmed cases | 198 (32) | 91 (15) | |
| oProbable cases | 104 (17) | 59 (9) | |
| -Viral encephalitis/meningitis | 209 (34) | 432 (69) | |
| oConfirmed cases | 76 (12) | 206 (33) | |
| oProbable cases | 133 (22) | 226 (36) | |
| -Tuberculous meningitis | 87 (14) | 31 (5) | |
| oConfirmed cases | 34 (5) | 11 (1.7) | |
| oProbable cases | 10 (2) | 2 (0.3) | |
| oPossible cases | 43 (7) | 18 (3) | |
| -Eosinophilic meningitis | 4 (0.6) | 1 (0.1) | |
| -Cryptococcal meningitis | 2 (0.3) | 0 (0) | |
| -Cerebral toxoplasmosis | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | |
| -Dual infection | 12 (2) | 10 (2) | |
|
| <0.001 | ||
| -Alive | 429 (70) | 493 (79) | |
| -Died | 73 (12) | 42 (7) | |
| -Transferred to other hospitals | 88 (14) | 71 (11) | |
| -Unknown outcome | 27 (4) | 18 (3) |
Cambodia, Laos.
Cham, Co Tu, Dao, H’Mong, Jarai, M’Nong, Mong, Nung, Pa Ko, STieng, Ta Oi, Tay, Thai, Xo Dang, Van Kieu, Chinese and Laotian.
Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test (when one or more of the expected count is less than 5).
Figure 3Time distribution of adult CNS infection admissions per study site.
Number of cases: absolute number of adult patients with CNS infection enrolled in the study per month.
Figure 4Time distribution of paediatric CNS infection admission per study site.
Number of cases: absolute number of children with CNS infection enrolled in the study per month.
Figure 5Time distribution of adult CNS infection admissions by all major pathogens at Hue Central hospital.
Number of cases: number of adult patients with CNS infection enrolled in the study at Hue Central hospital per month for 8 pathogens (results of PCR, serology and bacterial culture combined).
Laboratory confirmed aetiology for adults with CNS infection enrolled in the study.
| Pathogen, n (%) | Adults (n = 617) | ||
| PCR or serology results | Bacterial culture results | Combined results of PCR, serology and culture | |
|
| |||
|
| 147 (24) | 99 (16) | 147 (24) |
|
| 35 (6) | 15 (2) | 35 (6) |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
|
| 3 (0.5) | 1 (0.1) | 4 (0.6) |
|
| – | 2 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) |
|
| – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
|
| – | 2 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) |
|
| – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
|
| – | 5 (0.8) | 5 (0.8) |
|
| – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
|
| |||
| Japanese Encephalitis (JE) virus | 11 (2) | – | 11 (2) |
| Dengue virus | 23 (4) | – | 23 (4) |
| Enteroviruses | 20 (3) | – | 20 (3) |
|
| 22 (4) | – | 22 (4) |
|
| |||
|
| 34 (5) | – | 34 (5) |
|
| |||
|
| 2 (0.3) | – | 2 (0.3) |
|
| |||
| Dengue virus + | 2 (0.3) | 1 (0.1) | 2 (0.3) |
| Dengue virus + | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) |
| Dengue virus + | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) |
| Dengue virus + | 2 (0.3) | – | 2 (0.3) |
| Dengue virus + Eosinophilic meningitis | 2 (0.3) | – | 2 (0.3) |
| JE virus + | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) |
| Enteroviruses + | 1 (0.1) | – | 1 (0.1) |
|
| – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
|
| – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
| Unknown aetiology | 310 (50) | 487 (79) | 295 (48) |
Number of eosinophils in CSF sample was 352/880 (40%) in one case and 330/1320 (25%) in another case.
“Unknown aetiology” corresponds to the probable cases.
Laboratory confirmed aetiology for children with CNS infection enrolled in the study.
| Pathogen, n (%) | Children (n = 624) | ||
| PCR or serology results | Bacterial culture results | Combined results of PCR, serology and culture | |
|
| |||
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
|
| 36 (6) | 16 (3) | 37 (6) |
|
| 39 (6) | 9 (1) | 39 (6) |
|
| 6 (1) | 2 (0.3) | 6 (1) |
|
| – | 3 (0.5) | 3 (0.5) |
|
| – | 2 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) |
|
| – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
|
| – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
|
| – | 2 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) |
|
| |||
| Japanese Encephalitis (JE) virus | 142 (23) | – | 142 (23) |
| Dengue virus | 14 (2) | – | 14 (2) |
| Enteroviruses | 36 (6) | – | 36 (6) |
|
| 14 (2) | – | 14 (2) |
|
| |||
|
| 11 (2) | – | 11 (2) |
|
| |||
| Dengue virus + | 3 (0.5) | 1 (0.1) | 3 (0.5) |
| JE virus + | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) |
| JE virus + | 3 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 3 (0.5) |
| JE virus + | – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
| JE virus + | – | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
| Enteroviruses + | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) |
| Unknown aetiology | 318 (51) | 585 (94) | 306 (49) |
“Unknown aetiology” corresponds to the probable cases.
Laboratory confirmed aetiology for adult patients meeting the case definition of bacterial meningitis enrolled in the study (excluding dual infections).
| Pathogen, n (%) | Adults (n = 302) | ||
| PCR results | Culture results | Combined results of PCR and culture | |
|
| 147 (49) | 99 (33) | 147 (49) |
|
| 35 (12) | 15 (5) | 35 (12) |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
|
| 3 (1) | 1 (0.1) | 4 (1) |
|
| – | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.6) |
|
| – | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) |
|
| – | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.6) |
|
| – | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) |
|
| – | 5 (2) | 5 (2) |
|
| – | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) |
| Unknown aetiology | 117 (38) | 175 (58) | 104 (34) |
“Unknown aetiology” corresponds to the probable cases.
Laboratory confirmed aetiology for paediatric patients meeting the case definition of bacterial meningitis enrolled in the study (excluding dual infections).
| Pathogen, n (%) | Children (n = 150) | ||
| PCR results | Culture results | Combined results of PCR and culture | |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
|
| 36 (24) | 16 (11) | 37 (25) |
|
| 39 (26) | 9 (6) | 39 (26) |
|
| 6 (4) | 2 (1) | 6 (4) |
|
| – | 3 (2) | 3 (2) |
|
| – | 2 (1) | 2 (1) |
|
| – | 1 (1) | 1 (1) |
|
| – | 1 (1) | 1 (1) |
|
| – | 2 (1) | 2 (1) |
| Unknown aetiology | 69 (46) | 114 (76) | 59 (39) |
“Unknown aetiology” corresponds to the probable cases.
Figure 6Pathogens of bacterial meningitis by age group (excluding dual infection cases).
Laboratory confirmed aetiology per agegroup (bars) for patients meeting the case definition of bacterial meningitis. “Unknown aetiology” corresponds to patients with a diagnosis of probable bacterial meningitis.
Laboratory confirmed aetiology for patients meeting the case definition of viral encephalitis/meningitis enrolled in the study (excluding dual infections).
| Pathogen, n (%) | Adults (n = 209) | Children (n = 432) | p value |
| JE virus | 11 (5) | 142 (33) | <0.001 |
| Dengue virus | 23 (11) | 14 (3) | <0.001 |
| Enteroviruses | 20 (10) | 36 (8) | 0.603 |
|
| 22 (11) | 14 (3) | <0.001 |
| Unknown aetiology | 133 (64) | 226 (52) | 0.007 |
Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test (when one or more of the expected count is less than 5).
“Unknown aetiology” corresponds to the probable cases.
Figure 7Pathogens of viral encephalitis/meningitis by age group (excluding dual infection cases).
Laboratory confirmed aetiology per agegroup (bars) for patients meeting the case definition of viral meningitis/encephalitis (excluding dual infection cases). “Unknown aetiology” corresponds to patients with a diagnosis of probable viral encephalitis/meningitis.