Literature DB >> 22661766

Competitive Outcomes of Aquatic Container Diptera Depend on Predation and Resource Levels.

Marcus W Griswold1, L Philip Lounibos.   

Abstract

Resources and predation are both known to be important in structuring communities; however the strength of one factor may be affected by the intensity of the other. This study used a fully crossed factorial experiment in laboratory microcosms to examine the ability of a predator, Corethrella appendiculata (Grabham), and basal resources (leaf litter) to differentially affect two competing species of mosquito prey. Increased resources resulted in shorter developmental time and increased survivorship, mass, and population performance for both prey species, except when predation levels were high. Increased levels of predation and resources reduced the negative competitive effects of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) on Ochlerotatus triseriatus (Say). At low levels of resources and predation, the superior competitor, A. albopictus had the higher survivorship, and at high levels of resources and predation, the inferior competitor's survival was greater. Predators in high-resource treatments emerged larger than those in low resources, suggesting the occurrence of a bottom-up cascade or alternative feeding method. This study suggests that survival and coexistence of the two prey species may depend on the interaction of resources and predation, in that high levels of predation are important for the coexistence of both species.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 22661766      PMCID: PMC3363010          DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2005)098[0673:COOACD]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am        ISSN: 0013-8746            Impact factor:   2.099


  17 in total

Review 1.  Food webs in phytotelmata: "bottom-up" and "top-down" explanations for community structure.

Authors:  R L Kitching
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Does differential predation permit invasive and native mosquito larvae to coexist in Florida?

Authors:  Marcus W Griswold; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 2.465

3.  Benthic-pelagic links and rocky intertidal communities: bottom-up effects on top-down control?

Authors:  B A Menge; B A Daley; P A Wheeler; E Dahlhoff; E Sanford; P T Strub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effects of developmental asynchrony between Aedes triseriatus (Diptera:Culicidae) and its predator Toxorhynchites rutilus (Diptera:Culicidae).

Authors:  M A Nannini; S A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Differential Behavioral Responses to Water-Borne Cues to Predation in Two Container-Dwelling Mosquitoes.

Authors:  B Kesavaraju; S A Juliano
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Leaf litter decay process and the growth performance of Aedes albopictus larvae (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Hamady Dieng; Charles Mwandawiro; Michael Boots; Ronald Morales; Tomomitsu Satho; Nobuko Tuno; Yoshio Tsuda; Masahiro Takagi
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Pupal mass and wing length as indicators of fecundity in Aedes albopictus and Aedes geniculatus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Peter Armbruster; Robert A Hutchinson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Prospects for an invasion: competition between Aedes albopictus and native Aedes triseriatus.

Authors:  T P Livdahl; M S Willey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Food ingestion and digestive enzymes in larval Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  B C Ho; H G Khoo; L M Chew; K P Wong; A Ewert
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.278

10.  Development and survival of immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory: effects of density, food, and competition on response to temperature.

Authors:  H J Teng; C S Apperson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.278

View more
  17 in total

1.  Habitat complexity and sex-dependent predation of mosquito larvae in containers.

Authors:  Barry W Alto; Marcus W Griswold; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Evaluating the long-term metacommunity dynamics of tree hole mosquitoes.

Authors:  Alicia M Ellis; L Philip Lounibos; Marcel Holyoak
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Influence of resource levels, organic compounds and laboratory colonization on interspecific competition between the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) and the southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  D W Allgood; D A Yee
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.739

4.  COEXISTENCE, EXCLUSION, OR NEUTRALITY? A META-ANALYSIS OF COMPETITION BETWEEN AEDES ALBOPICTUS AND RESIDENT MOSQUITOES.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Isr J Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 0.559

5.  Surplus Killing by Predatory Larvae of Corethrella appendiculata: Prepupal Timing and Site-Specific Attack on Mosquito Prey.

Authors:  L P Lounibos; S Makhni; B W Alto; B Kesavaraju
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.309

6.  Do natural container habitats impede invader dominance? Predator-mediated coexistence of invasive and native container-dwelling mosquitoes.

Authors:  Banugopan Kesavaraju; Kavitha Damal; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Stage-dependent predation on competitors: consequences for the outcome of a mosquito invasion.

Authors:  Barry W Alto; Banugopan Kesavaraju; Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Your worst enemy could be your best friend: predator contributions to invasion resistance and persistence of natives.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos; Naoya Nishimura; Krystle Greene
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  No evolutionary response to four generations of laboratory selection on antipredator behavior of Aedes albopictus: potential implications for biotic resistance to invasion.

Authors:  Banugopan Kesavaraju; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.278

10.  Behavioral Responses of Aedes albopictus to a Predator Are Correlated with Size-Dependent Risk of Predation.

Authors:  Banugopan Kesavaraju; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.