Literature DB >> 19457021

Stage-dependent predation on competitors: consequences for the outcome of a mosquito invasion.

Barry W Alto1, Banugopan Kesavaraju, Steven A Juliano, L Philip Lounibos.   

Abstract

1. Predator-mediated coexistence occurs when predation allows competitors to coexist, due to preferential consumption of a superior competitor relative to an inferior competitor. Differences between the native treehole mosquito (Aedes triseriatus) and the co-occurring Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) in anti-predatory larval behaviours account, in part, for the greater vulnerability of this invasive species to native predatory midge (Corethrella appendiculata). We test the hypothesis that stage-dependent differences in the sizes of A. albopictus and A. triseriatus larvae, relative to the size-limited C. appendiculata, contribute to differential consumption and the likelihood of predator-mediated coexistence of these competitors. 2. In all instars, larvae of A. triseriatus were larger than A. albopictus of the same stage. Third and fourth instar C. appendiculata selectively consumed late-stage A. albopictus in preference to same-stage A. triseriatus. Small, early-stage prey larvae did not differ in vulnerability to predation, but large, late-stage larvae differed significantly in vulnerability to predation, probably owing to size-limited predation by fourth instar C. appendiculata. This effect was less pronounced for third instar C. appendiculata. 3. Prey size, in conjunction with anti-predatory behavioural responses, alters the probability of predator-mediated coexistence. A stage-structured predation model showed that equally vulnerable early stages reduce the range of environmental conditions (productivities) in which predator-mediated coexistence is possible, increasing the likelihood of both competitive exclusion of the resident species or failure of the invasive to establish. These results underscore the importance of stage-dependent interspecific differences in predator-prey interactions for determining how predators may affect community composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457021      PMCID: PMC2757155          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01558.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  17 in total

1.  Size structure and substitutability in an odonate intraguild predation system.

Authors:  Patrick W Crumrine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Does differential predation permit invasive and native mosquito larvae to coexist in Florida?

Authors:  Marcus W Griswold; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 2.465

3.  Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Predator identity and additive effects in a treehole community.

Authors:  Marcus W Griswold; L Philip Lounibos
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Differential Behavioral Responses to Water-Borne Cues to Predation in Two Container-Dwelling Mosquitoes.

Authors:  B Kesavaraju; S A Juliano
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Escape from gregarine parasites affects the competitive interactions of an invasive mosquito.

Authors:  Brianna W Aliabadi; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Complex interactions between native and invasive fish: the simultaneous effects of multiple negative interactions.

Authors:  Michael D Mills; Russell B Rader; Mark C Belk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Prospects for an invasion: competition between Aedes albopictus and native Aedes triseriatus.

Authors:  T P Livdahl; M S Willey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Development and survival of immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the laboratory: effects of density, food, and competition on response to temperature.

Authors:  H J Teng; C S Apperson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.278

10.  Natural and manipulated populations of the treehole mosquito, Ochlerotatus triseriatus, at its northernmost range limit in southern Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  D Dudley Williams; Sarah E MacKay; Ralf C M Verdonschot; Pierre J P Tacchino
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.671

View more
  7 in total

1.  Your worst enemy could be your best friend: predator contributions to invasion resistance and persistence of natives.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos; Naoya Nishimura; Krystle Greene
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Can Horton hear the whos? The importance of scale in mosquito-borne disease.

Authors:  C C Lord; B W Alto; S L Anderson; C R Connelly; J F Day; S L Richards; C T Smartt; W J Tabachnick
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  Predation resistance does not trade off with competitive ability in early-colonizing mosquitoes.

Authors:  Ebony G Murrell; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predation yields greater population performance: What are the contributions of density- and trait-mediated effects?

Authors:  Joseph T Neale; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.465

5.  Demographic consequences of predators on prey: trait and density mediated effects on mosquito larvae in containers.

Authors:  Barry W Alto; Jolene Malicoate; Scott M Elliott; Jacqueline Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Interspecific Competition between Aedes albopictus and A. sierrensis: potential for Competitive Displacement in the Western United States.

Authors:  Banugopan Kesavaraju; Paul T Leisnham; Samantha Keane; Nicholas Delisi; Rachel Pozatti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Species-specific non-physical interference competition among mosquito larvae.

Authors:  Alon Silberbush; Ido Tsurim; Ran Rosen; Yoel Margalith; Ofer Ovadia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.