Literature DB >> 22658308

Evaluating objective and subjective quantitative parameters at the initial visit to predict future glaucomatous visual field progression.

Allison K Ungar1, Gadi Wollstein, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Lindsey S Folio, Yun Ling, Richard A Bilonick, Robert J Noecker, Juan Xu, Larry Kagemann, Cynthia Mattox, Joel S Schuman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of structural assessment to predict glaucomatous visual field progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 119 healthy eyes with suspected glaucoma and glaucomatous eyes with 5 or more optic nerve stereophotographs, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) all acquired within 6 months of each other were enrolled. Odds ratios to predict progression were determined by generalized estimating equation models.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.0 years (range: 1.5 to 5.7 years). Fifteen eyes progressed by glaucoma progression analysis, 20 by visual field index, and 10 by both. Baseline parameters from stereophotographs (vertical cup-to-disc ratio and Disc Damage Likelihood Scale), OCT (global, superior quadrant, and inferior quadrant retinal nerve fiber layer thickness), and CSLO (cup shape measure and mean cup depth) were significant predictors of progression. Comparing the single best parameter from all models, only the OCT superior quadrant RNFL predicted progression.
CONCLUSION: Baseline stereophotographs, OCT, and CSLO measurements may be clinically useful to predict glaucomatous visual field progression. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22658308      PMCID: PMC3444548          DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20120524-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging        ISSN: 1542-8877


  26 in total

1.  Retinal nerve fiber layer normative classification by optical coherence tomography for prediction of future visual field loss.

Authors:  Kyung Rim Sung; Sophia Kim; Youngrok Lee; Sung-Cheol Yun; Jung Hwa Na
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage.

Authors:  Atilla Bayer; Paul Harasymowycz; Jeffrey D Henderer; William G Steinmann; George L Spaeth
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Mae O Gordon; Julia A Beiser; James D Brandt; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

4.  Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.

Authors:  Bryce A Ford; Paul H Artes; Terry A McCormick; Marcelo T Nicolela; Raymond P LeBlanc; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph.

Authors:  Stefano Miglior; Magda Guareschi; Elena Albe'; Silvia Gomarasca; Mauro Vavassori; Nicola Orzalesi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS): interobserver agreement of a new grading system to assess glaucomatous optic disc damage.

Authors:  F Bochmann; J P Howell; C Meier; C Becht; M A Thiel
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 0.700

7.  A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression.

Authors:  Boel Bengtsson; Anders Heijl
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.

Authors:  George L Spaeth; Jeffrey Henderer; Connie Liu; Muge Kesen; Undraa Altangerel; Atilla Bayer; L Jay Katz; Jonathan Myers; Douglas Rhee; William Steinmann
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2002

9.  Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT).

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Kiavash Nikkhou; Douglas C Hoffman; Simon K Law; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2008 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Henderer; Connie Liu; Muge Kesen; Undraa Altangerel; Atilla Bayer; William C Steinmann; George L Spaeth
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical Prediction Performance of Glaucoma Progression Using a 2-Dimensional Continuous-Time Hidden Markov Model with Structural and Functional Measurements.

Authors:  Youngseok Song; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Mengfei Wu; Yu-Ying Liu; Katie A Lucy; Fabio Lavinsky; Mengling Liu; Gadi Wollstein; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Prediction of Visual Field Progression from OCT Structural Measures in Moderate to Advanced Glaucoma.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Alessandro Rabiolo; Kiumars Edalati; Joseph Caprioli; Siamak Yousefi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.488

3.  Effect of phacoemulsification on measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head parameters using spectral-domain-optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Bhaskar Jha; Reetika Sharma; Murugesan Vanathi; Tushar Agarwal; Talvir Sidhu; Ankit Tomar; Tanuj Dada
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 May-Aug
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.