BACKGROUND: The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) is a new grading system to estimate the amount of optic disc damage in glaucoma patients. The objective of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement of the DDLS and the cup/disc ratio. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The reproducibility of the DDLS and the cup/disc ratio was measured by two masked observers (one glaucoma specialist and one of two resident physicians in their first 6 months of training) staging 42 eyes of 25 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Disc size, cup/disc ratio and DDLS were documented and the Cohen's kappa was calculated as a measure for interobserver agreement. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement for the cup/disc ratio was good (Cohen's kappa 0.803). For the DDLS, the interobserver agreement was even better (Cohen's kappa 0.902). DISCUSSION: Unlike the cup/disc ratio, which focuses on the excavation, the DDLS is based directly on the thickness of the neuroretinal rim and takes into account the optic disc size. Therefore, the DDLS estimates the glaucomatous damage of the optic disc more precisely than the currently used method. Although this new grading system is more complicated to use in clinical practice, the interobserver agreement for the DDLS in our study setting was very good.
BACKGROUND: The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) is a new grading system to estimate the amount of optic disc damage in glaucomapatients. The objective of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement of the DDLS and the cup/disc ratio. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The reproducibility of the DDLS and the cup/disc ratio was measured by two masked observers (one glaucoma specialist and one of two resident physicians in their first 6 months of training) staging 42 eyes of 25 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Disc size, cup/disc ratio and DDLS were documented and the Cohen's kappa was calculated as a measure for interobserver agreement. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement for the cup/disc ratio was good (Cohen's kappa 0.803). For the DDLS, the interobserver agreement was even better (Cohen's kappa 0.902). DISCUSSION: Unlike the cup/disc ratio, which focuses on the excavation, the DDLS is based directly on the thickness of the neuroretinal rim and takes into account the optic disc size. Therefore, the DDLS estimates the glaucomatous damage of the optic disc more precisely than the currently used method. Although this new grading system is more complicated to use in clinical practice, the interobserver agreement for the DDLS in our study setting was very good.
Authors: Allison K Ungar; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Lindsey S Folio; Yun Ling; Richard A Bilonick; Robert J Noecker; Juan Xu; Larry Kagemann; Cynthia Mattox; Joel S Schuman Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Date: 2012-05-31
Authors: Andrea C Kara-José; Luiz Alberto S Melo; Bruno L B Esporcatte; Angelica T N H Endo; Mauro Toledo Leite; Ivan Maynart Tavares Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 3.240