Literature DB >> 22654348

Shear bond strength of composite veneers and acrylic veneer bonded to ni-cr alloy: a laboratory study.

Manish Katyayan, Preeti Katyayan, K Ravishankar.   

Abstract

A growing number of composite materials are being used as an alternative for veneering cast restorations. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of UDMA based composite, restorative composite, and heat cure acrylic when veneered to Ni-Cr alloy and to evaluate the type of bond failure. Three different veneering materials were used: heat cure acrylic, UDMA based composite and a restorative composite. 10 samples were fabricated, each with heat cure acrylic and restorative composite and 20 samples were fabricated with UDMA based composite; thus, the total number of samples amounted to 40. All the samples were subject to shear bond stress fracture tests and observed for the type of bond failure. The greatest mean shear bond strength was recorded in relation to the UDMA based composite material when thermal conducting paste was used during the curing (10.51 MPa). The mean bond strength values of UDMA based composite without thermal conducting paste (8.92 MPa), heat cured acrylic veneering material (4.24 MPa) and restorative composite material (5.03 MPa) were significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). Samples veneered with heat cure acrylic veneering material and restorative composite material showed adhesive failure. Samples prepared with UDMA based composite veneering composite showed cohesive or predominantly cohesive failure. UDMA based composite veneering material when used with heat protection paste exceeds the shear bond strength requirement as suggested by Matsumura et al. (>10 MPa). A statistically significant association between the test groups and the type of failure was observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bond failure; Shear bond strength; Veneering composite

Year:  2011        PMID: 22654348      PMCID: PMC3120956          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-011-0069-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  14 in total

1.  Shear bond strength of techniques for bonding esthetic veneers to metal.

Authors:  H Petridis; H Hirayama; G Kugel; C Habib; P Garefis
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Shear strength of laboratory-processed composite resins bonded to a silane-coated nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy.

Authors:  H Kolodney; A D Puckett; K Brown
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Composite veneering of metal based fixed partial dentures.

Authors:  M Rosentritt; M Behr; H Brückner; G Handel
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Shear bond strength of three veneering resins to a Ni-Cr alloy using two bonding procedures.

Authors:  I Seimenis; A Sarafianou; H Papadopoulou; Tr Papadopoulos
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Adhesive bonding of composites to a casting alloy.

Authors:  D G Naegeli; E S Duke; R Schwartz; B K Norling
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Shear bond strength evaluation of different veneering systems on Ni-Cr alloys.

Authors:  Yalçin Ciftçi; Senay Canay; Nur Hersek
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Comparative evaluation of secondary heat treatment and a high intensity light source for the improvement of properties of prosthetic composites.

Authors:  N Tanoue; H Matsumura; M Atsuta
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.837

8.  Cytotoxic effects of packable and nonpackable dental composites.

Authors:  Alexander Franz; Franz König; Margit Anglmayer; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Gabriele Gille; Wolf Dieter Rausch; Trevor Lucas; Wolfgang Sperr; Andreas Schedle
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units.

Authors:  N Tanoue; H Matsumura; M Atsuta
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Bond strength of fibre-reinforced composite to the metal surface.

Authors:  P K Vallittu; H Kurunmäki
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.